Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W163905913> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W163905913 abstract "The principle of epistemic closure is the claim that what is known to follow from knowledge is known to be true. This intuitively plausible idea is endorsed by a vast majority of knowledge theorists. There are significant problems, however, that have to be addressed if epistemic closure – closed knowledge – is endorsed. The present essay locates the problem for closed knowledge in the separation it imposes between knowledge and evidence. Although it might appear that all that stands between knowing the truth of the premises of a valid inference and knowledge of its conclusion is inferring it from the premises, the evidence for each of the premises may jointly count against the conclusion. The intuitive view regarding inferred knowledge says one thing, the evidence says another. One epistemological framework that seems to have the resources to resolve this tension endorses the view that knowledge always requires conclusive evidence. A second framework resolves the tension by limiting the scope of the closure principle. Only inferences drawn directly from propositions contained in the scope of a single knowledge operator are considered closed. The aim of the present essay is to revive the unpopular third option, the idea that knowledge is open. The essay proceeds by arguing that in different ways the two former frameworks only succeed in relocating the problem, not in resolving it. The first framework, the infallibilist view, relocates the problem to a sharp separation between knowledge of the occurrences of events from knowledge of their chance of occurring, a separation leading to several significant additional problems. The fallibilist view, the second framework, in endorsing closure neglects to take into full account the ways in which evidence fails to be transitive. For instance, evidence can count in favor of a conjunction while counting against each of its conjuncts. This fact, which is argued for in the essay on probabilistic as well as non-probabilistic grounds, is used as the foundation of an argument against closed knowledge that can be used as a way to understand several of the most fundamental challenges of epistemology. Not only can an open knowledge view that is based on open evidence resolve all these problems in a simple and natural way, it can also respond to formidable challenges that significantly hinder other open knowledge views. There are good reasons, then, to view both knowledge and evidence as open." @default.
- W163905913 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W163905913 creator A5005892077 @default.
- W163905913 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W163905913 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W163905913 title "Knowledge Closure and Knowledge Openness : A Study of Epistemic Closure Principles" @default.
- W163905913 cites W1512028330 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1556096785 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1570100281 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1571008965 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1600348701 @default.
- W163905913 cites W168227014 @default.
- W163905913 cites W180582013 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1980353160 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1987998790 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1989450197 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1999028743 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1999221187 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1999643582 @default.
- W163905913 cites W1999845764 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2007230448 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2017862619 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2025174338 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2032206951 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2033370584 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2035921609 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2036095457 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2039431552 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2049957691 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2050283732 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2054477822 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2056519246 @default.
- W163905913 cites W205727057 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2078324608 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2083828611 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2092338482 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2100405054 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2106091051 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2133752818 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2141027875 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2312358567 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2312532838 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2323384468 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2326544310 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2489840832 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2735435455 @default.
- W163905913 cites W2799014876 @default.
- W163905913 cites W3135212331 @default.
- W163905913 cites W3175308615 @default.
- W163905913 cites W45292014 @default.
- W163905913 cites W583407148 @default.
- W163905913 cites W592962467 @default.
- W163905913 cites W628102658 @default.
- W163905913 cites W653411598 @default.
- W163905913 cites W657142726 @default.
- W163905913 cites W88601605 @default.
- W163905913 cites W173485 @default.
- W163905913 cites W22045699 @default.
- W163905913 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W163905913 type Work @default.
- W163905913 sameAs 163905913 @default.
- W163905913 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W163905913 countsByYear W1639059132012 @default.
- W163905913 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W163905913 hasAuthorship W163905913A5005892077 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C146834321 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C2776214188 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W163905913 hasConcept C84976871 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C111472728 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C138885662 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C144024400 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C146834321 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C15744967 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C17744445 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C199360897 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C199539241 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C2776214188 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C2778012447 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C41008148 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C77805123 @default.
- W163905913 hasConceptScore W163905913C84976871 @default.
- W163905913 hasLocation W1639059131 @default.
- W163905913 hasOpenAccess W163905913 @default.
- W163905913 hasPrimaryLocation W1639059131 @default.
- W163905913 hasRelatedWork W1854935416 @default.
- W163905913 hasRelatedWork W1940013500 @default.
- W163905913 hasRelatedWork W1971577336 @default.
- W163905913 hasRelatedWork W1992626145 @default.
- W163905913 hasRelatedWork W1997453613 @default.
- W163905913 hasRelatedWork W2034086527 @default.