FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W163915488> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W163915488 abstract "A major problem in characterising rarity traits is that rare species are less studied than common species. Consequently, little is known about their distribution, ecology, demography, or behaviour, and their categorisation as rare may simply be a result of scarcity of data. In particular, there is a lack of comparative studies of closely-related rare and common species, an issue addressed by this thesis. My research investigated niche differentiation, rarity, and commonness in two sympatric species of rainforest rodents in the genus Uromys, one of which is common while the other is extremely rare, and endeavoured to provide insights into why this is so. This is an increasingly important question as continuing habitat destruction, fragmentation, and over-exploitation threaten the existence of many rare species and significantly decrease populations of what were once common species. The primary aim of the thesis is to clarify the ecological characteristics that make a species more prone to rareness and thus vulnerable to extinction. Prior to this study little was known of the ecology of the rare Pygmy White-tailed Rat Uromys hadrourus and, surprisingly, only basic distribution and population data was available for its sister species the common Giant White-tailed Rat Uromys caudimaculatus. To obtain the data necessary to facilitate an ecological comparison of the two species, a capture-mark-recapture program was conducted. Using the results from this study, niche differentiation analyses were used to compare the ecological and behavioural traits of the two Uromys species. The characteristics recognised in the literature as potentially predisposing a species to rarity were examined in light of the niche analyses.Niche differentiation. There is significant niche differentiation between Uromys caudimaculatus and U. hadrourus but the two species do not appear to occupy completely independent ecological niches. There is overlap in diet with U. hadrourus exploiting some of the softer large-fruited seeds also utilised by U. caudimaculatus. However, the larger size and strong jaws of U. caudimaculatus enable the species to exploit hard-seeded rainforest fruits inaccessible to other rainforest rodents, including U. hadrourus. Both species feed on insects by tearing open decomposing logs and stumps; they also chew the bark of tree buttresses to feed on the sap weeping from the fresh edges of the scars. However, a significant part of the diet of U. hadrourus was obtained from aerial tree roots, a dietary resource not utilised by U. caudimaculatus. Aerial roots primarily occurred on the lower trunks of trees located on the densely vegetated lower slopes, along streams and gullies, and in the wetter areas of the forest. The ability to climb is a significant niche difference between the two Uromys species. The scansorial ability of U. caudimaculatus allows it to access resources in the tree canopy (food and refuges/nesting sites) that are unavailable to the terrestrial U. hadrourus. However, the structure of the hind foot indicates that U. hadrourus was almost certainly scansorial at some stage of its evolution.Differences in body size are also significant. Uromys caudimaculatus is one of the largest species in the genus with a mean body weight three times that of U. hadrourus, the smallest representative of the genus. The larger body size of U. caudimaculatus brings with it a number of ecological advantages; fewer predators and competitors and the ability to easily break into hard seeds inaccessible to other small mammals. The smaller size of U. hadrourus makes it more vulnerable to predation than the larger U. caudimaculatus. Further niche differentiation was evident in the habitat utilised by U. caudimaculatus, which did most of its foraging in the abundant open-understorey forest. In contrast, U. hadrourus was only recorded in the spatially rare and densely-vegetated forest occurring on the lower slopes, along gullies, and 1st and 2nd order streams.Differences in behaviour may also play a part in niche differentiation with indications that U. hadrourus is more sedentary than U. caudimaculatus and that the breeding season of U. caudimaculatus may be longer with juveniles dispersing away from the natal area more quickly than juvenile U. hadrourus. Rarity Characteristics. Of the nine ecological variables examined, three were identified as characterising natural rarity in the small mammal assemblage. These comprised habitat specificity, low dispersal ability, and specialism. While it is difficult to determine whether any one of these three characteristics is a precursor of, or makes a greater contribution to species’ rarity, it is more probable that natural rarity depends on a ‘flexible’ amalgam of the three traits. Although possibly an important cause of rarity in some species, it is equally plausible that specialism may evolve as a consequence of rarity. It is also likely that abundance and habitat specificity are strongly regulated by energy (resource) requirements and availability, varying with individual species’ ecology and life-history traits. Dispersal ability is fundamentally interrelated with both habitat specificity and specialism and there are indications that it plays an important role in the maintenance of rarity in this north Queensland assemblage of rainforest small mammals. There were significantly negative associations between three sets of variables: (1) Abundance - Body Size; (2) Habitat - Body Size; and (3) Specialism Index - Body Size, indicating body size has little to do with population density, habitat specificity, or the degree of specialism in this small mammal assemblage. Predation risk is an unknown factor in habitat specificity-dispersal-specialism characteristics of rare species, but there is ample evidence that predation can force changes in species’ habitat use. Animals commonly choose among habitats that differ both in foraging return and mortality hazard, and strong predator pressure has been shown to account for low abundance and small range size of many species. Using the two Uromys as examples of this model, the larger U. caudimaculatus, being less at risk of predation, may have chosen to forage in habitat which maximises its foraging gain; while the smaller and more vulnerable U. hadrourus may have forgone the benefits of increased foraging gain in favour of reducing predation levels by using less risky habitat." @default.
• W163915488 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W163915488 creator A5043872718 @default.
• W163915488 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W163915488 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W163915488 title "Niche differentiation, rarity, and commonness in the sympatric Australian white-tailed rats: Uromys caudimaculatus and Uromys hadrourus" @default.
• W163915488 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W163915488 type Work @default.
• W163915488 sameAs 163915488 @default.
• W163915488 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W163915488 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W163915488 hasAuthorship W163915488A5043872718 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C102715595 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C153991713 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C180395843 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C40141808 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C53676125 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C53889494 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C78991832 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W163915488 hasConcept C92274894 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C102715595 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C144024400 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C149923435 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C153991713 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C180395843 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C185933670 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C18903297 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C205649164 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C2908647359 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C40141808 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C53676125 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C53889494 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C78991832 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C86803240 @default.
• W163915488 hasConceptScore W163915488C92274894 @default.
• W163915488 hasLocation W1639154881 @default.
• W163915488 hasOpenAccess W163915488 @default.
• W163915488 hasPrimaryLocation W1639154881 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W1917887189 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W1981751960 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W1985552075 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W1988784796 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W1990398306 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2001159778 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2005008077 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2028264182 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2045749310 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2065987143 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2067302879 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2130712115 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2317793791 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2319109561 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2327058148 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2588394839 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2593133660 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W2984511685 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W3102715051 @default.
• W163915488 hasRelatedWork W93852911 @default.
• W163915488 isParatext "false" @default.
• W163915488 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W163915488 magId "163915488" @default.
• W163915488 workType "dissertation" @default.