FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W163960410> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W163960410 abstract "t is generally accepted that productivity growth is a major source of economic growth and welfare improvement. Labour productivity has accounted for roughly half of the growth in per capita GDP in the OECD over the last two decades, with the other half primarily accounted for by increases in labour utilisation, that is, changes in the demographics, unemployment and labour force participation rates. For this reason, productivity is of vital interest to economists and policymakers. An understanding of technical and efficiency change, two key factors in productivity growth, is thus important in policy decision-making. Academics and policy makers continue to debate the relative contributions of shocks and policy changes impacting on population growth, capital accumulation, microeconomic behaviour and technological advance. Different policy settings impact on both aggregate performance and the productivity of sectors and factors. This paper presents an analysis of the relative growth performance of Australia, New Zealand and Ireland concentrating on the underlying components of labour productivity, particularly efficiency change and technical change. Such analysis is important to policy decisions of countries seeking to improve their relative international position and outlook. It is important that policymakers identify sustainable productivity changes (largely driven by technological change) separately from measured productivity change. This separation facilitates assessment of the extent to which technology adoption and diffusion contribute to a productivity catch-up. This work is similar in many respects to rec ent studies undertaken by the OECD (2004a), but with important methodological differences introduced by Margaritis, Fare and Grosskopf (2005). The individual contributions of industry productivity growth and sectoral composition to aggregate productivity are also considered. The novelty of the productivity measurement and analysis used by Margaritis, Fare and Grosskopf is that it ‘derives from a decomposition of the growth in labour productivity in terms of (a) technical change both neutral and biased, (b) efficiency change, and (c) capital accumulation’. Each component’s contribution to the growth in labour productivity can then be assessed. The paper proceeds as follows. We outline the relative economic growth performance of Australia, New Zealand and Ireland over the period 1979-2002," @default.
• W163960410 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W163960410 creator A5024573169 @default.
• W163960410 creator A5059276172 @default.
• W163960410 creator A5082334868 @default.
• W163960410 creator A5086577182 @default.
• W163960410 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W163960410 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W163960410 title "Productivity and Economic Growth in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland" @default.
• W163960410 cites W1492662576 @default.
• W163960410 cites W1512505801 @default.
• W163960410 cites W1557732185 @default.
• W163960410 cites W1994143906 @default.
• W163960410 cites W2051079330 @default.
• W163960410 cites W2057375580 @default.
• W163960410 cites W2107252896 @default.
• W163960410 cites W2164339653 @default.
• W163960410 cites W2488227451 @default.
• W163960410 cites W2597420597 @default.
• W163960410 cites W3123052400 @default.
• W163960410 cites W603318614 @default.
• W163960410 cites W930892359 @default.
• W163960410 cites W2890618857 @default.
• W163960410 doi "https://doi.org/10.22459/ag.12.04.2005.01" @default.
• W163960410 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W163960410 type Work @default.
• W163960410 sameAs 163960410 @default.
• W163960410 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W163960410 countsByYear W1639604102021 @default.
• W163960410 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W163960410 hasAuthorship W163960410A5024573169 @default.
• W163960410 hasAuthorship W163960410A5059276172 @default.
• W163960410 hasAuthorship W163960410A5082334868 @default.
• W163960410 hasAuthorship W163960410A5086577182 @default.
• W163960410 hasBestOaLocation W1639604101 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C26271046 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C48824518 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W163960410 hasConcept C555463525 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C144024400 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C162324750 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C204983608 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C205649164 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C26271046 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C36289849 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C48824518 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C50522688 @default.
• W163960410 hasConceptScore W163960410C555463525 @default.
• W163960410 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W163960410 hasLocation W1639604101 @default.
• W163960410 hasLocation W1639604102 @default.
• W163960410 hasOpenAccess W163960410 @default.
• W163960410 hasPrimaryLocation W1639604101 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W1781724239 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W2052504849 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W2073631073 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W2102150589 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W2461059200 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W2808756347 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W3145765285 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W3151638566 @default.
• W163960410 hasRelatedWork W2187217174 @default.
• W163960410 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W163960410 isParatext "false" @default.
• W163960410 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W163960410 magId "163960410" @default.
• W163960410 workType "article" @default.