FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W164773844> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W164773844 abstract "Arbitration in Hungary has a long standing tradition and there is also available extensive case law of Hungarian national courts regarding arbitration. It was confirmed repeatedly that courts may not intervene in arbitral proceedings in the event a valid arbitration clause exists and that arbitration courts and arbitral institutions are not a part of the judiciary and not subject to the oversith authority of the Supreme Court of Hungary (for instance decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary as from 2001). A full authonomy of the Parties has been confirmed by the court practise in respect to the annulment proceedings as a demand for the annulment of an arbitral award may only be made by a party to the particular arbitral proceedings or by a person that is subject to an abligation imposed by the arbitral award, provided that the arbitral award has been delivered to such a person. The Hungarian courts (or any authority) are therefore not entitled to set-aside an award ex officio (Ruling of the Pect Reginal Court as of 2006). The same decision confirmed inter partes effects of arbitral awards.Very interesting judgment has been issued by Debrecen Regional Court in 2006. The court stated that If an enforceable arbitral award has the nature of a court judgment for the purposes of its enforcement, regulations pertaining to the enforcement of court rulings may be applied to such an award, including a mutual legal assistance (rogattory) treaty (in this case, an agreement between Hungary and Ukraine) that guarantees the enforceability of court judgments. Due to the nature of an arbitral award, which is qualified as identical to a court judgment for enforcement purposes, regulations pertaining to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards (in this case, the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards) are used together with regulations pertaining to the enforcement of court judgments, where those regulations apply that allow recognition and enforcement to a larger extent.Extraordinarity of public policy issues has confirmed the Supreme Court of Hungary in 2006 when ruling that in arbitral proceedings, it is permissible to restrict some constitutional rights with regard to the process of law finding. Public policy violation only as an especially serious violation of rights. Arbitration restricts or excludes, in a constitutionally conforming manner, certain fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution with regard to legal protection. An assertion claiming the absence of fair and impartial trial in arbitration does not mean that the public policy of [Hungary] has been violated at the same time. A violation of fundamental rights may represent a violation of the public policy of [Hungary]. However, a violation of public policy is committed only if fundamental principles of law are violated." @default.
• W164773844 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W164773844 creator A5031044208 @default.
• W164773844 date "2011-04-01" @default.
• W164773844 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W164773844 title "Special Case Law of the Courts on the Relation of Arbitration and Constitutional Issues: Hungary" @default.
• W164773844 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W164773844 type Work @default.
• W164773844 sameAs 164773844 @default.
• W164773844 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W164773844 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W164773844 hasAuthorship W164773844A5031044208 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C160151201 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C160786031 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C2776111965 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C2776607877 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C2778645526 @default.
• W164773844 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C160151201 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C160786031 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C17744445 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C199539241 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C2776111965 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C2776154427 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C2776607877 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C2776949292 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C2778272461 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C2778645526 @default.
• W164773844 hasConceptScore W164773844C2779777834 @default.
• W164773844 hasLocation W1647738441 @default.
• W164773844 hasOpenAccess W164773844 @default.
• W164773844 hasPrimaryLocation W1647738441 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W1512916038 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2180388670 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2198738414 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2212287474 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2269214097 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2280331748 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2292558267 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2359607961 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2465214415 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2486119083 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2772474119 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2940921536 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W2945178557 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W3119281234 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W3179717984 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W3199029718 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W45921306 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W74115522 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W750999586 @default.
• W164773844 hasRelatedWork W1909331257 @default.
• W164773844 isParatext "false" @default.
• W164773844 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W164773844 magId "164773844" @default.
• W164773844 workType "article" @default.