FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1661569217> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1661569217 endingPage "28" @default.
• W1661569217 startingPage "18" @default.
• W1661569217 abstract "The measurement of contact characteristics of the spindle–holder taper interface is critical for the evaluation of the performance of a machine tool spindle system. In this study, an ultrasonic method was proposed to measure the contact stiffness and pressure distribution on the taper interface. The taper interface was scanned by an ultrasound transducer, and the nominal contact area was directly estimated from the resulting ultrasonic reflection coefficient. The normal stiffness distribution was determined by the spring-damper model from the reflection coefficient. On this basis, the distributed and global radial stiffness of the taper interface was calculated by the presented theoretical formulas. Meanwhile, a calibration curve was established to convert the ultrasonic reflection to contact pressure. Based on the proposed ultrasonic method, the effects of angle fitting error and clamping force were studied. The results show that the contact area, contact pressure and contact stiffness increase with the clamping force. As the angle fitting error increases, the contact area decreases, while the pressure and stiffness at the big end of the taper interface become much larger than these at the small end. In the meantime, the global radial stiffness increases first and then decreases. This result suggests that a larger angle fit error within the permissible range is better for the global radial stiffness. Moreover, the measured results confirm that a taper joint with an angle fit error larger than +36 is not suitable for practical application, because the contact pressure at the small end is too small. To compare with the ultrasonic method, the geometrical shape profiles of the contact surfaces were constructed, and FE models were also established for contact pressure predictions. The comparison shows that the ultrasound results are consistent with the surface shape profiles and the numerical predictions. Besides, one of the taper interfaces was measured three times with the same clamping force, and the results indicate that the repeatability of the proposed method is good." @default.
• W1661569217 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1661569217 creator A5021512474 @default.
• W1661569217 creator A5027754907 @default.
• W1661569217 creator A5044367570 @default.
• W1661569217 creator A5051105876 @default.
• W1661569217 creator A5073501391 @default.
• W1661569217 date "2015-10-01" @default.
• W1661569217 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1661569217 title "Ultrasonic measurement of contact stiffness and pressure distribution on spindle–holder taper interfaces" @default.
• W1661569217 cites W1967113224 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W1970014107 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W1975236853 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W1980754019 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W1983322177 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W1991143188 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W1995646558 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2003840340 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2006067929 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2008813301 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2013697128 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2017856106 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2017995232 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2020141257 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2027140320 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2035553173 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2037768760 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2039579632 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2046133495 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2054170985 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2054820217 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2056766420 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2059749691 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2063100028 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2063822006 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2068627916 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2068970375 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2070461281 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2072787843 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2072798985 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2075472206 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2078995590 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2082892247 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2083450625 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2085949596 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2088532115 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2128182937 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2143922509 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2148307086 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2159688578 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2160593846 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W2171802081 @default.
• W1661569217 cites W936423603 @default.
• W1661569217 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.06.007" @default.
• W1661569217 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1661569217 type Work @default.
• W1661569217 sameAs 1661569217 @default.
• W1661569217 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W1661569217 countsByYear W16615692172016 @default.
• W1661569217 countsByYear W16615692172018 @default.
• W1661569217 countsByYear W16615692172019 @default.
• W1661569217 countsByYear W16615692172020 @default.
• W1661569217 countsByYear W16615692172021 @default.
• W1661569217 countsByYear W16615692172022 @default.
• W1661569217 countsByYear W16615692172023 @default.
• W1661569217 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1661569217 hasAuthorship W1661569217A5021512474 @default.
• W1661569217 hasAuthorship W1661569217A5027754907 @default.
• W1661569217 hasAuthorship W1661569217A5044367570 @default.
• W1661569217 hasAuthorship W1661569217A5051105876 @default.
• W1661569217 hasAuthorship W1661569217A5073501391 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C135628077 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C141903097 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C165838908 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C2779372316 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C33373654 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C41700454 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C65682993 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C81288441 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C81302111 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConcept C84111939 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConceptScore W1661569217C120665830 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConceptScore W1661569217C121332964 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConceptScore W1661569217C127413603 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConceptScore W1661569217C135628077 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConceptScore W1661569217C141903097 @default.
• W1661569217 hasConceptScore W1661569217C159985019 @default.

• next