FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1662773950> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1662773950 endingPage "380" @default.
• W1662773950 startingPage "379" @default.
• W1662773950 abstract "Reviewed by: Il Sillabo di Pio IX ed. by Luca Sandoni Frank J. Coppa Il Sillabo di Pio IX. Edited by Luca Sandoni with an Introduction by Daniele Menozzi. (Bologna: CLUEB [Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice Bologna]; Rome: Casa Editrice Università La Sapienza. 2012. Pp. 192. €16,00 paperback. ISBN 978-88-491-3648-7.) In contemplating the volume The Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX, a reader may wonder what more might be said about the famous—some said infamous—document inspired by the Spanish philosopher Juan Donoso Cortes and issued in 1864 by Pope Pius IX (r. 1846–78) during the course of the Counter-Risorgimento. As all this is well known, why, then, another study of the Syllabus? Historian Daniele Menozzi’s informative and interesting introduction (pp. 7–22) provides the answer. Within these pages Menozzi notes that although most political issues involved in the Roman Question have been resolved, the ideological struggle not only between church and state but also within the Church continues to the present, with frequent recourse to the Syllabus by both the champions and critics of modernization. The introduction traces the use of the Syllabus by traditionalists to combat liberal tendencies within the Church and a means of resisting its aggiornamento. The title of the volume fails to reveal that this is also a study of the conservative reliance on the Syllabus to combat the transformation of Catholicism over the decades. The subtitle of the introduction—“The Return of the Syllabus”—is also somewhat misleading, as it suggests that recourse to the Syllabus was sporadic rather than more or less continuous. In fact, Menozzi traces the influence and impact of the Syllabus from the nineteenth to the twentieth century, focusing on its influence on the decree Lamentabili of 1907, the encyclical Pascendi likewise issued in 1907 by Pius X (r. 1903–14), and the encyclical Humani generis of 1950 released by Pius XII (r. 1939–58). Also discussed is its use in the Second Vatican [End Page 379] Council (1962–65) to limit the reformism of Pope John XXIII (r. 1958–63) and Paul VI (r. 1963–78). Apparently it also played a part in John Paul II’s balancing the beatification of the liberal John XXIII with the conservative Pius IX (p. 18). Many more examples might have been provided, but the case is sufficiently made. The Syllabus of Errors, appended to Pio Nono’s encyclical Quanta cura issued on December 8, 1864, is not presented in these pages simply as a last-ditch effort to preserve the papacy’s temporal power and as a document that faded into obscurity when it failed to do so—as presented in some liberal studies and publications. On the contrary, its eighty condemnations, divided into ten sections, are here presented as a continuing and powerful tool to counter the philosophy and practices of the modern world that had permitted the “unification” that the encyclical and Syllabus deemed a “usurpation.” Its condemnations of toleration, the separation of church and state, along with the refusal of the pontiff to reconcile himself with modern civilization did not produce the third restoration following that of 1812 and 1849. Nonetheless, the Syllabus emerged as a potent tool for traditionalists who viewed Catholicism and contemporary society as incompatible and helped the former combat the latter. The Syllabus is here presented not as a historical oddity but as an ongoing factor influencing the faith and the broader society. The introductory chapter is followed by the longer one by the editor Luca Sandoni, a specialist on the eighteenth-century Enlightenment in Tuscany, who elaborates on the genesis and formation of this emblematic document (pp. 23–89). The first part of the book provides a narrative and analysis of the drafting and issuance of the Syllabus, the second explores the European reaction to it, and the third provides some of the editor’s reflections and conclusions on its nature and usage. The encyclical Quanta cura (in Latin and Italian, pp. 94–107) follows, along with the appended Syllabus of Errors (likewise in Latin and Italian, pp. 110–35). The work concludes with the editor’s annotations on the sources and arguments of the eighty..." @default.
• W1662773950 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1662773950 creator A5070243934 @default.
• W1662773950 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W1662773950 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1662773950 title "Il Sillabo di Pio IX ed. by Luca Sandoni" @default.
• W1662773950 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2015.0104" @default.
• W1662773950 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1662773950 type Work @default.
• W1662773950 sameAs 1662773950 @default.
• W1662773950 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1662773950 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1662773950 hasAuthorship W1662773950A5070243934 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C45504901 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C53844881 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C11413529 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C138885662 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C15708023 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C17744445 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C199539241 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C41008148 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C45504901 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C48103436 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C53844881 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C74916050 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C94625758 @default.
• W1662773950 hasConceptScore W1662773950C95457728 @default.
• W1662773950 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1662773950 hasLocation W16627739501 @default.
• W1662773950 hasOpenAccess W1662773950 @default.
• W1662773950 hasPrimaryLocation W16627739501 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2165504552 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2351660476 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2369014945 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2372474386 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2378613765 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2386222756 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2388350402 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2562022654 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W2766153923 @default.
• W1662773950 hasRelatedWork W4287488637 @default.
• W1662773950 hasVolume "101" @default.
• W1662773950 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1662773950 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1662773950 magId "1662773950" @default.
• W1662773950 workType "article" @default.