FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W16647652> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W16647652 endingPage "430" @default.
• W16647652 startingPage "395" @default.
• W16647652 abstract "Background/Context More than a century before modern controversies over scripted instruction, the Froebelian kindergarten—the original kindergarten method designed by Friedrich Froebel—and Maria Montessori's pedagogy were criticized for rigidly prescribing how teachers taught and children learned. Today, scripted methods such as Direct Instruction and Success for All are condemned for limiting teachers’ autonomy and narrowing students’ learning, especially that of students from low-income backgrounds, for and with whom scripts are often designed and used. Proponents of scripted instruction counter that it is helpful for teachers and effective with students. Comparing historical and modern scripts offers an opportunity to explore teachers’ reactions to this hotly debated approach to school reform and to think about some possible implications for teacher education. Purpose/Objective/Research Questions/Focus of Study I examine how teachers reacted to four different models of scripted instruction. I chose to compare the Froebelian kindergarten, Montessori, Direct Instruction, and Success for All because of their longevity, wide use, and the amount of information available about them. I focus on the scripts’ theory and research base and teacher training, and on teachers’ assessments of the scripts’ effectiveness, and ask how these factors might influence teachers’ autonomy, fidelity, and resistance when using scripts. Research Design Using historical methods, I summarize the history of scripted instruction; selectively survey research on teacher autonomy, fidelity, and resistance; and interpret primary and secondary sources on the Froebelian kindergarten, Montessori, Direct Instruction, and Success for All. Findings/Results Teacher autonomy, fidelity, and resistance varied in these four scripts. Froebelian kindergarten and Montessori teachers autonomously chose to receive scripted, lengthy, intensive, pre-service training and professional development in closed professional learning communities. Direct Instruction and Success for All teachers receive scripted, relatively limited pre-service training and ongoing professional development in schools in which teachers often do not autonomously choose to teach. Despite the scripted training, most Froebelian kindergarten teachers, and many Montessori, Direct Instruction, and Success for All teachers modified these scripts at the classroom level; some Froebelian and Montessori teachers made very overt, substantial changes when the social class backgrounds of the students changed. Many Froebelian and most Montessori teachers seemed to believe that these scripts helped their students learn. Direct Instruction and Success for All teachers express more mixed views of these scripts’ effectiveness. Some say that the scripts “work” for their students but that as teachers they feel constrained, a situation I see as a professional dilemma. Anecdotally, some new teachers with little pre-service training say that they feel limited by scripts but daunted by the task of creating curricula and instruction on their own. Conclusions/Recommendations My research raises questions about teachers’ reactions to scripts. The examples of Froebelian kindergarten, Montessori, Direct Instruction, and Success for All teachers I studied suggest that there may be unpredictable contradictions in scripted instruction. Scripted, autonomously chosen, intensive training may strengthen teacher fidelity and resistance, by giving teachers a deep repertoire of pedagogical skills that some continue to use and others use to autonomously modify scripts in response to students’ perceived needs. Scripted, externally imposed, less extensive training may give some teachers a sense of security but also create tensions between the scripts’ perceived effectiveness and the teachers’ desires for autonomy, and, for new teachers, between autonomy and the difficulty of independently designing curricula and methods. I argue that these reactions suggest that educators in traditional pre-service teacher education programs may want to experiment with offering an autonomous choice of distinctly different instructional models, including scripted ones such as Direct Instruction and Success for All, in which teachers in training in professional learning communities may become deeply skilled. I also argue that script developers may want to experiment with giving teachers more explicit autonomy, both in choosing scripts and in modifying them, and more extensive pre-service training. I recommend more comparative research on teachers’ reactions to scripts, especially on new teachers." @default.
• W16647652 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W16647652 creator A5071909367 @default.
• W16647652 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W16647652 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W16647652 title "The Dilemma of Scripted Instruction: Comparing Teacher Autonomy, Fidelity, and Resistance in the Froebelian Kindergarten, Montessori, Direct Instruction, and Success for All" @default.
• W16647652 cites W106848221 @default.
• W16647652 cites W1758500610 @default.
• W16647652 cites W1966629650 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2012618335 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2018643207 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2030414615 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2040552366 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2070616725 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2109458289 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2119158305 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2123032065 @default.
• W16647652 cites W2140660714 @default.
• W16647652 cites W309617472 @default.
• W16647652 cites W581183183 @default.
• W16647652 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300305" @default.
• W16647652 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W16647652 type Work @default.
• W16647652 sameAs 16647652 @default.
• W16647652 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522013 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522014 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522015 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522016 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522017 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522018 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522019 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522020 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522021 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522022 @default.
• W16647652 countsByYear W166476522023 @default.
• W16647652 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W16647652 hasAuthorship W16647652A5071909367 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C2778496695 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C2780805685 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C57473165 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C61423126 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W16647652 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C111472728 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C111919701 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C138885662 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C145420912 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C151730666 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C15744967 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C17744445 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C18903297 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C19417346 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C199539241 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C2778496695 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C2779343474 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C2780805685 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C41008148 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C57473165 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C61423126 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C65414064 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C86803240 @default.
• W16647652 hasConceptScore W16647652C88610354 @default.
• W16647652 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W16647652 hasLocation W166476521 @default.
• W16647652 hasOpenAccess W16647652 @default.
• W16647652 hasPrimaryLocation W166476521 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W1994151902 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2049482805 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2063631212 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2066033608 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2074012746 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2137677969 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2389961935 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2473231316 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2567512270 @default.
• W16647652 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W16647652 hasVolume "113" @default.
• W16647652 isParatext "false" @default.
• W16647652 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W16647652 magId "16647652" @default.
• W16647652 workType "article" @default.