FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W167218246> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W167218246 endingPage "8" @default.
• W167218246 startingPage "3" @default.
• W167218246 abstract "Enrollment management has come to be defined in structural terms when what is needed is an understanding of institutional academic context. Concentrating on which offices should be brought together to do enrollment work can lead to being stuck on structure, forcing institution to reflect enrollment management rather than ensuring that enrollment management reflects institution. Enrollment management needs to use an academic lens to define an EM Ethos-the underlying fundamental character and spirit of an institution's culture. This EM Ethos makes structure servant rather than master of enrollment policy and strategy. This refocusing of enrollment management on academic context can provide at last a template institutions developing their enrollment management approach. It is a template based on vertical communication that articulates a strategic vision, horizontal communication that opens dialogue and completes feedback loops, and structure consistent with institution's academic mission. Enrollment managers who speak language of academic context-with data and research-will eventually be heard more convincingly than those who speak language of structure. Enrollment structure follows academic understanding, and therein lies future of enrollment management. Structuralism: The Historical EM Throughout my career in enrollment management I have been an unabashed structuralist. I left one institution when a senior administrator suggested that significant enrollment offices reported to enrollment manager for convenience. At University of Cincinnati we paid ultimate homage to structuralism and built a building to house structure, bringing ten different offices from five different buildings into one facility designed to enhance a blending of responsibilities. One might say we made a structure structure. To this day, I obsess about units included in enrollment management organization. In some respects, such an obsession is understandable. Many of earliest proponents of enrollment management (EM) concentrated on offices that needed to come together to accomplish a more purposeful approach to EM. Jack Maguire, father of EM, called it a grand design (1976) that developed to bring about a synergy among functions such as admissions, financial aid, and retention, which too often were viewed as independent and working at cross purposes (Britz 1998). How else could institutions change this silo culture but with a structure that brought disparate units together? Certainly, structural approach to EM took a permanent place in literature when Kemerer, Baldridge, and Green introduced what has been called the quintessential enrollment management structural forms (Henderson 2001). Their seminal 1982 book suggested that EM was organized in increasingly complex structures: marching millions committee, let's-give-the-admissions-director-something-more-to-do coordinator, conflict avoidance matrix model, and now-we're-serious division. Here was a recipe EM that took into account how difficult organizational change might be in a given campus culture. The committee might be a good way to begin EM process while a coordinator might take advantage of existing mid-management staff to develop collaboration by dint of personality. A matrix model raised EM to senior levels of campus administration without realigning offices in different administrative areas. Only division was able to effect most transformational change by bringing all appropriate areas together under a cabinet-level officer. Hossler (1986) added change models to structural mix by suggesting that EM organizations developed based on urgency of need change. Stable enrollments could, at best, yield incremental change, probably best achieved through a committee; a crisis brought on by plummeting enrollment would require more draconian change, often creation of a new division. …" @default.
• W167218246 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W167218246 creator A5035498436 @default.
• W167218246 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W167218246 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W167218246 title "Refocusing Enrollment Management: Losing Structure and Finding the Academic Context." @default.
• W167218246 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W167218246 type Work @default.
• W167218246 sameAs 167218246 @default.
• W167218246 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W167218246 countsByYear W1672182462012 @default.
• W167218246 countsByYear W1672182462014 @default.
• W167218246 countsByYear W1672182462015 @default.
• W167218246 countsByYear W1672182462018 @default.
• W167218246 countsByYear W1672182462020 @default.
• W167218246 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W167218246 hasAuthorship W167218246A5035498436 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C182566 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C2776932993 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C2778903259 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C2780510313 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C67674302 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C86532276 @default.
• W167218246 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C120912362 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C144024400 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C151730666 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C162324750 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C17744445 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C182566 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C187736073 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C199539241 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C2776932993 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C2778903259 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C2779343474 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C2780510313 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C36289849 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C39549134 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C67674302 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C86532276 @default.
• W167218246 hasConceptScore W167218246C86803240 @default.
• W167218246 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W167218246 hasLocation W1672182461 @default.
• W167218246 hasOpenAccess W167218246 @default.
• W167218246 hasPrimaryLocation W1672182461 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W12753752 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W129183663 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W1510104317 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W1534058264 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W193495733 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W2037832622 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W204127835 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W214533003 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W2332276172 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W2332372307 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W2394907500 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W2596489542 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W282029507 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W2915857148 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W3125708575 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W326944198 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W348170007 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W618608095 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W235163527 @default.
• W167218246 hasRelatedWork W2615140850 @default.
• W167218246 hasVolume "80" @default.
• W167218246 isParatext "false" @default.
• W167218246 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W167218246 magId "167218246" @default.
• W167218246 workType "article" @default.