FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1678497522> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1678497522 endingPage "e0134038" @default.
• W1678497522 startingPage "e0134038" @default.
• W1678497522 abstract "Decision-making relies on both analytical and emotional thinking. Cognitive reasoning styles (e.g. maximizing and satisficing tendencies) heavily influence analytical processes, while affective processes are often dependent on regret. The relationship between regret and cognitive reasoning styles has not been well studied in physicians, and is the focus of this paper.A regret questionnaire and 6 scales measuring individual differences in cognitive styles (maximizing-satisficing tendencies; analytical vs. intuitive reasoning; need for cognition; intolerance toward ambiguity; objectivism; and cognitive reflection) were administered through a web-based survey to physicians of the University of South Florida. Bonferroni's adjustment was applied to the overall correlation analysis. The correlation analysis was also performed without Bonferroni's correction, given the strong theoretical rationale indicating the need for a separate hypothesis. We also conducted a multivariate regression analysis to identify the unique influence of predictors on regret.165 trainees and 56 attending physicians (age range 25 to 69) participated in the survey. After bivariate analysis we found that maximizing tendency positively correlated with regret with respect to both decision difficulty (r=0.673; p<0.001) and alternate search strategy (r=0.239; p=0.002). When Bonferroni's correction was not applied, we also found a negative relationship between satisficing tendency and regret (r=-0.156; p=0.021). In trainees, but not faculty, regret negatively correlated with rational-analytical thinking (r=-0.422; p<0.001), need for cognition (r=-0.340; p<0.001), and objectivism (r=-0.309; p=0.003) and positively correlated with ambiguity intolerance (r=0.285; p=0.012). However, after conducting a multivariate regression analysis, we found that regret was positively associated with maximizing only with respect to decision difficulty (r=0.791; p<0.001), while it was negatively associated with satisficing (r=-0.257; p=0.020) and objectivism (r=-0.267; p=0.034). We found no statistically significant relationship between regret and overall accuracy on conditional inferential tasks.Regret in physicians is strongly associated with their tendency to maximize; i.e. the tendency to consider more choices among abundant options leads to more regret. However, physicians who exhibit satisficing tendency - the inclination to accept a good enough solution - feel less regret. Our observation that objectivism is a negative predictor of regret indicates that the tendency to seek and use empirical data in decision-making leads to less regret. Therefore, promotion of evidence-based reasoning may lead to lower regret." @default.
• W1678497522 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1678497522 creator A5006670717 @default.
• W1678497522 creator A5013468383 @default.
• W1678497522 creator A5021167699 @default.
• W1678497522 creator A5034549114 @default.
• W1678497522 creator A5035096925 @default.
• W1678497522 creator A5071327630 @default.
• W1678497522 creator A5076100445 @default.
• W1678497522 date "2015-08-04" @default.
• W1678497522 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1678497522 title "Thinking Styles and Regret in Physicians" @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1869362176 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1970566767 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1976716107 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1978680109 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1980063309 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1983951877 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1984486655 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W1988631338 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2005818586 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2019725494 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2046137060 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2053905359 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2054788835 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2055876778 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2062626754 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2066987116 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2072385612 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2074315705 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2076646346 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2084335597 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2107605390 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2108286413 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2116272087 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2128299237 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2135499056 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2140650362 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2157581667 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2161080627 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2167366201 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2563802450 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W2917288823 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W3122318885 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W3122619615 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W4235316990 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W4250042789 @default.
• W1678497522 cites W4313429348 @default.
• W1678497522 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134038" @default.
• W1678497522 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4524595" @default.
• W1678497522 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26241650" @default.
• W1678497522 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1678497522 type Work @default.
• W1678497522 sameAs 1678497522 @default.
• W1678497522 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222015 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222016 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222017 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222018 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222019 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222020 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222021 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222022 @default.
• W1678497522 countsByYear W16784975222023 @default.
• W1678497522 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1678497522 hasAuthorship W1678497522A5006670717 @default.
• W1678497522 hasAuthorship W1678497522A5013468383 @default.
• W1678497522 hasAuthorship W1678497522A5021167699 @default.
• W1678497522 hasAuthorship W1678497522A5034549114 @default.
• W1678497522 hasAuthorship W1678497522A5035096925 @default.
• W1678497522 hasAuthorship W1678497522A5071327630 @default.
• W1678497522 hasAuthorship W1678497522A5076100445 @default.
• W1678497522 hasBestOaLocation W16784975221 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C127808970 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C150681269 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C50817715 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConcept C94822996 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C105795698 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C118552586 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C127808970 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C150681269 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C154945302 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C15744967 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C169900460 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C180747234 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C33923547 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C41008148 @default.
• W1678497522 hasConceptScore W1678497522C50817715 @default.

• next