FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1679777767> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1679777767 endingPage "104" @default.
• W1679777767 startingPage "95" @default.
• W1679777767 abstract "Many Americans balance dual caregiving responsibilities for both children and aging family, dubbed the “sandwich generation.” Between 1 out of 8 and 1 out of 11 households with an adult aged 30 or older is comprised of dual-earner, sandwiched generation couples. There are psychological, physical, employment, and financial outcomes of balancing multiple caregiving duties. The literature shows positive benefits for caregivers too. A review of literature in the past 30 years, citing only U.S.based studies is summarized in this paper. Policy, clinical, and research implications are included. It is possible that multigenerational caregiving responsibilities will continue to rise for the children of baby boomers as life expectancies continue to go up, people continue to have children later in life, and continue to support those children to older ages. Policy and clinical supports must be put into place to facilitate the highly necessary and valuable caregiving responsibilities of this population. Florida Public Health Review, 2012; 9, 95-104. Background Many Americans are balancing dual caregiving responsibilities for both children and aging family members. Researchers have named this population the “sandwich generation” because they have both child rearing and aging family member caregiving responsibilities (Miller, 1981). The baby boom generation, between the ages of 45-55 years old, is often the focus of research on this population but it can impact any person of any generation as they balance multiple caregiving roles across generations. Sometimes the caregivers are referred to as the squeezed generation or stretched generation. The real sandwich occurs when people manage the demands of many different responsibilities and roles in their lives including those of parent, caregiver to an elder, and an employee (Keene & Prokos, 2007). Several demographic trends are putting caregiving pressure on middle-aged adults. Americans are experiencing longer life expectancies reaching just over 78 years old on average (CIA World Fact Book, 2011). Due to advancements in medical science, technology, and healthcare we have the oldest aging society in the history of the world. Fertility is on a steady decline in industrialized societies, and women are delaying parenthood into their 30s and 40s (Kent, 2011; Dye, 2010). This means that families are smaller, and the age span between grandchildren and grandparents is larger than it had been before. Sixty percent of all women are in the paid workforce, which means they must balance traditional caregiving roles with paid employment (U.S. Department of Labor, 2010). The mobile nature of today’s societies means that family members are dispersed across the country, which adds to caregiving complications and stressors especially given the “age in place” desires by today’s seniors. Several characteristics of the U.S. healthcare systems have created undue pressure on family members including a lack of coverage for long-term care and shortages in employees in the health care workforce. Medicare pays for the first 100 days following a hospital stay. If someone needs long term care beyond that, they either must have the financial resources to pay for it out of pocket or qualify for Medicaid (must have low income and little assets). Finally, the shortage in healthcare workers leads to family members providing care to loved ones rather than hiring professionals, which is also often cost prohibitive. This paper summarizes the literature on the sandwich generation in order to explore what is known about this population in the scholarly arena. Methods Academic Search Premier was used as the search engine. Four combinations of terms were used: (1) sandwich + generation, (2) multigenerational + caregiving, (3) care + aging parent + children and (4) caregiving + burden + generation. The search strategy included finding articles for which the terms came up in the abstract, title, or key words. Letters, editorials, book reviews, and metaanalyses were excluded. Only peer-reviewed articles that utilized U.S. studies (to avoid comparing the U.S. to countries with more developed long term health care programs) were included. No date range was given because the coinage of the term only dates back to 1981. A total of 833 articles were identified using this search method. Every article was scanned to determine its relevance to this review. Those that didn’t pertain to the topic were eliminated. Abstracts were read for the remaining 61 articles followed by full article readings to reach final inclusion decision. A set of criteria was established to determine whether an article was going to be included or not. Articles" @default.
• W1679777767 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1679777767 creator A5032750274 @default.
• W1679777767 creator A5038966402 @default.
• W1679777767 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1679777767 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1679777767 title "The sandwich generation: a review of the literature." @default.
• W1679777767 cites W102200768 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W128123027 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W1954063063 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W1999423697 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2004845231 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2009335634 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2012199905 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2037560438 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2038993692 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2041143271 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2047240773 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2050530120 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2081284266 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2083696536 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2093331721 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2141059347 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2151659839 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2171325992 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2172108737 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2288756334 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2404538409 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2502509917 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W39358975 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2199813437 @default.
• W1679777767 cites W2890972319 @default.
• W1679777767 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1679777767 type Work @default.
• W1679777767 sameAs 1679777767 @default.
• W1679777767 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W1679777767 countsByYear W16797777672013 @default.
• W1679777767 countsByYear W16797777672014 @default.
• W1679777767 countsByYear W16797777672015 @default.
• W1679777767 countsByYear W16797777672016 @default.
• W1679777767 countsByYear W16797777672018 @default.
• W1679777767 countsByYear W16797777672021 @default.
• W1679777767 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1679777767 hasAuthorship W1679777767A5032750274 @default.
• W1679777767 hasAuthorship W1679777767A5038966402 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C13774568 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C1691868 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C2776444593 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C2777496998 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C3017688695 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C3019122810 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C4249254 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C13774568 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C138496976 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C144024400 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C149923435 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C15744967 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C162324750 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C1691868 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C18903297 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C2776444593 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C2777496998 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C2908647359 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C3017688695 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C3019122810 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C4249254 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C71924100 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C74909509 @default.
• W1679777767 hasConceptScore W1679777767C86803240 @default.
• W1679777767 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1679777767 hasLocation W16797777671 @default.
• W1679777767 hasOpenAccess W1679777767 @default.
• W1679777767 hasPrimaryLocation W16797777671 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W1536713208 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W1821813924 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W1875025231 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W1908978024 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W1979591470 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W1984159858 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2020935088 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2029505142 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2039136028 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2116699464 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2141059347 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2150345895 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2171325992 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2190004408 @default.
• W1679777767 hasRelatedWork W2206261873 @default.

• next