FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1699398754> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1699398754 endingPage "130" @default.
• W1699398754 startingPage "113" @default.
• W1699398754 abstract "(For the first and second part of this paper) The greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood), is an important pest of a number of glasshouse crops. Since about 1970 the pest is controlled on an increasing area and in an increasing number of countries by introduction of a natural enemy, the parasite Encarsia formosa Gahan. In 1979 biological control of the greenhouse whitefly was applied in 11 countries on about 1200 hectares. After several years of application of E. formosa we started a research project on population dynamics of host and parasite. The reasons were: 1 to find a quick and reliable sampling method, both for growers and suppliers of parasites; 2 to test the effectiveness of the Dutch method of introducing E. formosa; 3 to find an explanation for the usually worse control results in small glasshouses compared with results obtained in large houses; 4 to test Huffaker's 1958 hypothesis that coexistence of predator and prey is possible only if special requirements of space and dispersal capacity of both prey and predator are fulfilled. The changes in numbers and distribution of greenhouse whitefly and its parasite were followed for 16 weeks in a glasshouse of 6480 m2 containing 18,000 tomato plants. Two methods were used: weekly counts of pupae on all infested plants and a stratified random sampling program whereby 0.6 % of the plants were checked each week. Results obtained with the random sampling did not reflect the actual numbers and the distribution of both organisms at all, and this method can therefore not be recommended to growers and suppliers of parasites (Eggenkamp-Rotteveel Mansveld et al. 1978). Data of the absolute counts and the distribution maps constructed with these data revealed that: 1 the introduction scheme used in the Netherlands was successful (the parasites are introducted 1 to 4 weeks after the pest has been seen, 4 parasite introductions with an interval of two weeks, with a planned total of 6 parasites per plant; in our study the total number of parasites that was released appeared to be 9.8). No whitefly damage was observed throughout the cropping period. This control result is no exception but the rule for houses where biocontrol is applied. 2 the distribution of both the whitefly and parasite was clustered though the degree of clustering decreased strongly in the course of time. It changed gradually towards a regular pattern during the last weeks. This was caused by migration of whitefly adults, which resulted in an increase of the number of infected plants but a decrease in the number of pupae per infected plant, so the total number did not increase. 3 the dispersal and searching capacity of the parasite are very good. The parasites covered distances of 10 m at least and they were able to find even a single host pupa on a plant that grew amidst many uninfested plants. 4 in Huffaker's 1958 experiment subpopulations of a phytophagous mite could be completely eliminated by a predatory mite, while at the same time new subpopulations of the phytophagous mite developed on other fruits. Complete extinction of patches (patch: a group of whiteflies and/or parasites separated from other such groups by a 3 m wide space without whiteflies or parasites) did not occur. However, within patches whiteflies and parasites regularly migrated to other plants. The whitefly subpopulation on one plant sometimes disappeared through complete parasitism, while a new subpopulation developed on another plant. From patches or plants where all hosts are parasitised, the parasites migrate to the new whitefly subpopulations. As a result of this, the percentage parasitism per plant varied between 0 and 100 %. The average percentage parasitism was rather constant (around 50 %), so the heterogeneity in the glasshouse leads to an “overall-stability” while the events taking place on one plant were quite dramatic." @default.
• W1699398754 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1699398754 creator A5026790076 @default.
• W1699398754 creator A5050946933 @default.
• W1699398754 creator A5065428384 @default.
• W1699398754 creator A5071611559 @default.
• W1699398754 date "1982-01-12" @default.
• W1699398754 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1699398754 title "The parasite-host relationship between Encarsia formosa (Hym., Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hom., Aleyrodidae)" @default.
• W1699398754 cites W174899368 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W178243549 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W1963484423 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W1976525968 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W1986767551 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2007531638 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2011635902 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2014869623 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2030957570 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2035071578 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2049562474 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2063197214 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2067422373 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2082646735 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2108289478 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2112797249 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2120933442 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2124164202 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2158796593 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W222374976 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2243212884 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2244413780 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2245943235 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2246607162 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2247658077 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2319058725 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2319153755 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2319639812 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2323358873 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2329379515 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W242446200 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2569121284 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2611953569 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2616725071 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2904180070 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2915290521 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W3190474770 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W3194908877 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W78814142 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2883911290 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W2909931382 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W3183458205 @default.
• W1699398754 cites W3183804446 @default.
• W1699398754 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1982.tb03577.x" @default.
• W1699398754 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
• W1699398754 type Work @default.
• W1699398754 sameAs 1699398754 @default.
• W1699398754 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W1699398754 countsByYear W16993987542021 @default.
• W1699398754 countsByYear W16993987542022 @default.
• W1699398754 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1699398754 hasAuthorship W1699398754A5026790076 @default.
• W1699398754 hasAuthorship W1699398754A5050946933 @default.
• W1699398754 hasAuthorship W1699398754A5065428384 @default.
• W1699398754 hasAuthorship W1699398754A5071611559 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C104727253 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C126831891 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C22508944 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C2776988988 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C2777943290 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C2778043781 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C2778260489 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C2778652030 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C2781436638 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C32198211 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C33070731 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C104727253 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C126831891 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C144024400 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C144027150 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C149923435 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C188382862 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C18903297 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C22508944 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C2776988988 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C2777943290 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C2778043781 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C2778260489 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C2778652030 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C2781436638 @default.
• W1699398754 hasConceptScore W1699398754C2908647359 @default.

• next