FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1699774102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1699774102 abstract "Amb lobjectiu de poder fer mes eficac la lluita contra els incendis, shan analitzat dos models de comportament dels incendis forestals a Catalunya: els incendis periurbans, a lArea Metropolitana de Barcelona (AMB), i els incendis rurals, a la comarca del Bages. Lanalisi de locurrencia dels focs entre els anys 1987 i 1998 ha permes definir les caracteristiques daquests dos ambits pel que fa a lefectacio dels incendis.En general, lincrement de la massa arbustiva i forestal derivats de labandonament dels usos tradicionals dels boscos, juntament amb una major frequentacio, ha comportat lagument del risc tant dignicio com de propagacio dels focs.Lanalisi contrastada de les dades dels incendis de lAMB i del Bages, en el context territorial i huma corresponent, posa de manifest dues situacions ben diverses pel que fa als factors de risc, pero igualment vulnerables. LAMB, que concentra el 50% de la poblacio en l1,8 del territori catala es mes vulnerable pel gran nombre dignicions. El Bages, en canvi, amb nomes un 4,2% ho es mes a la propagacio dels focs.En sintesi, els problemes que han dafrontar lAMB i el Bages son:- Lus molt mes dens del territori en el cas de lAMB afavoreix la proliferacio dignicions especialment localitzades en la interfase urbana-forestal. Al Bages, en canvi, sense la mobilitat i fragmentacio de lAMB es fa mes dificil de controlar un menor numero de focus.- Pel que fa a lestructura del territori, lAMB es caracteritza per una gran fragmentacio, mentre que el Bages te una major continuitat de les masses forestals. La comarca es ressent especialment de la tendencia dexpansio forestal generalitzada derivada de labandonament rural i el canvi dusos del sol.- Les actuacions de prevencio son diferents. LAMB disposa dun potent dispositiu de prevencio propi, coordinat pel Parc de Collserola, a mes de participar en els plans de prevencio general aplicat a tot el territori catala. El Bages participa nomes del sistema de prevencio general aplicat a tot el territori catala.Mentre que a lAMB, tal com ho demostren les estadistiques, el control de la propagacio dels incendis esta ben solucionat gracies a la rapida capacitat de deteccio, cal dedicar esforcos per reduir lelevat numero dignicions. El Bages, en canvi, senfronta amb el complex problema de lincrement de superficie forestal sense gestionar.La funcio del bosc en un i en un altre ambit, convida a reflexionar sobre la relacio entre els incendis i la gestio territorial. No tot el bosc es pot protegir, pero caldria ques en la planificacio territorial es consideri la possibilitat de l'incendi i es prevegin les mesures perque no es presenti o, si es presenta, en minimitzi al maxim les consequencies.With the objective of trying to fight more efficiently against fire, two models of behaviour of forest fire in Catalunya have been analysed: the periurban fire in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (MAB) and forest fire in the comarca of Bages.In general, the increase of the bush and forest mass, derived from the abandonment of the traditional uses of the woods, together with a major frequentation have increased the risk of ignition and fire propagation.The contrasted analysis of the fire data in the MAB and the Bages, in the corresponding territorial and human context, show two very different situations in relation with the risk factors. The MAB, with the 50% of the population in the 1.8 of the Catalan territory, is more vulnerable because of the number of ignitions, whereas the Bages with only a 4.2 % is more vulnerable to fire propagation.In summary, the problems that the MAB and the Bages have to face up are:- In the MAB, the heavier use of the territory helps the proliferation of ignitions specially located in the urban-fores interphase. On the other hand, it is much more difficult to control a less number of focuses in the Bages, although this territory has less mobility and fragmentation than the MAB.- In relation with the structure of the territory, the MAB has a great fragmentation, whereas the Bages has a major continuity in the forest masses. The comarca suffers the generalized tendency of forest growth derived from the forest abandonment and the change of the uses of the soil.- The actions of prevention are different. The MAB has an own strong prevention system, coordinated by the Collserola park, apart from participating in the general preventive plan applied to all the Catalan territory. The Bages only participates in the general prevention system .As shown in the statistics, the control of the fire propagation in the MAB is well solved thanks to the quick detection efficiency, but it is necessary to make efforts to reduce the high number of ignitions. On the other hand, the Bages faces the complex problem ofthe increase of forest surface without management.In both areas, the forest function should make us think over the relationship between fire and forest management. All woods cannot be protected, but the risk of fire and the ways to prevent it, should be considered in the territorial planification and its consequences should be minimized." @default.
• W1699774102 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1699774102 creator A5028219981 @default.
• W1699774102 date "2001-02-16" @default.
• W1699774102 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1699774102 title "La incidència dels incendis a l¿Àrea Metropolitana de Barcelona i a la comarca del Bages durant el període 1987-1998" @default.
• W1699774102 cites W101281046 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W108444638 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W114419245 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W133401430 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1490857705 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1498880722 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1499434901 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1500111726 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1524056168 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1531419578 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1546760337 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1574124857 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1593569405 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1602392695 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1602538324 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1607484816 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1608028791 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1719985882 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W178099604 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1932601390 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1973749534 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1978652379 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1979587406 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1982952585 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1984868512 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1988060474 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W1988226611 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2000919062 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2004934538 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2009302652 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2017920315 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2021585161 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2026415375 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2031983852 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2039955993 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2055242945 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2056091222 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2058329721 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2070390114 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2086848869 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2090293022 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2105440670 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2112581465 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2125214271 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2140363400 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2156701632 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2161206953 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2240352704 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2270914156 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2317654778 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2346742934 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2418567879 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2493201045 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2503988816 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W250422104 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2518366920 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2618617943 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2788627773 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W3034084687 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W3123895940 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W37217007 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W645374302 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W841259307 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2146375803 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2467387975 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2519385645 @default.
• W1699774102 cites W2545119860 @default.
• W1699774102 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W1699774102 type Work @default.
• W1699774102 sameAs 1699774102 @default.
• W1699774102 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1699774102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1699774102 hasAuthorship W1699774102A5028219981 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConcept C164105321 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConceptScore W1699774102C142362112 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConceptScore W1699774102C15708023 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConceptScore W1699774102C164105321 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConceptScore W1699774102C166957645 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConceptScore W1699774102C17744445 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConceptScore W1699774102C205649164 @default.
• W1699774102 hasConceptScore W1699774102C2779343474 @default.
• W1699774102 hasLocation W16997741021 @default.
• W1699774102 hasOpenAccess W1699774102 @default.
• W1699774102 hasPrimaryLocation W16997741021 @default.
• W1699774102 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1699774102 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1699774102 magId "1699774102" @default.
• W1699774102 workType "article" @default.