FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1700304324> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1700304324 abstract "Hallux valgus is classified as an abnormal deviation of the great toe (hallux) towards the midline of the foot.To identify and evaluate the evidence from randomised trials of interventions used to correct hallux valgus.We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauama Group trials register (2003/1), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2003) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2003). No language restrictions were applied. Hand searching of specific foot journals was also undertaken.Date of the most recent search: 31st March 2003.Randomised or quasi-randomised trials of both conservative and surgical treatments of hallux valgus. Excluded were studies comparing areas of surgery not specific to the control of the deformity such as use of anaesthetics or tourniquet placement.Methodological quality of trials which met the inclusion criteria was independently assessed by two reviewers. Data extraction was undertaken by two reviewers. The trials were grouped according to the interventions being compared, but the dissimilarity in the comparisons prevented pooling of results.The methodological quality of the 21 included trials was generally poor and trial sizes were small.Three trials involving 332 participants evaluated conservative treatments versus no treatment. There was no evidence of a difference in outcomes between treatment and no treatment.One good quality trial involving 140 participants compared surgery to conservative treatment. Evidence was shown of an improvement in all outcomes in patients receiving chevron osteotomy compared with those receiving orthoses. The same trial also compared surgery to no treatment in 140 participants. Evidence was shown of an improvement in all outcomes in patients receiving chevron osteotomy compared with those receiving no treatment.Two trials involving 133 people with hallux valgus compared Keller's arthroplasty with other surgical techniques. In general, there was no advantage or disadvantage using Keller's over the other techniques. When the distal osteotomy was compared to Keller's arthroplasty, the osteotomy showed evidence of improving the intermetatarsal angle and preserving joint range of motion. The arthroplasty was found to have less of an impact on walking ability compared to the arthrodesis.Six trials involving 309 participants compared chevron (and chevron-type) osteotomy with other techniques. The chevron osteotomy offered no advantages in these trials. For some outcomes, other techniques gave better results. Two of these trials (94 participants) compared a type of proximal osteotomy to a proximal chevron osteotomy and found no evidence of a difference in outcomes between techniques.Three trials involving 157 participants compared outcomes between original operations and surgeon's adaptations. There was no advantage found for any of the adaptations.Three trials involving 71 people with hallux valgus compared new methods of fixation to traditional methods. There was no evidence that the new methods of fixation were detrimental to the outcome of the patients.Four trials involving 162 participants evaluated methods of post-operative rehabilitation. The use of continuous passive motion appeared to give an improved range of motion and earlier recovery following surgery. Early weightbearing or the use of a crepe bandage were not found to be detrimental to final outcome.Only a few studies had considered conservative treatments. The evidence from these suggested that orthoses and night splints did not appear to be any more beneficial in improving outcomes than no treatment. Surgery (chevron osteotomy) was shown to be beneficial compared to orthoses or no treatment, but when compared to other osteotomies, no technique was shown to be superior to any other. Only one trial had compared an osteotomy to an arthroplasty. There was limited evidence to suggest that the osteotomy gave the better outcomes. It was notable that the numbers of participants in some trials remaining dissatisfied at follow-up were consistently high (25 to 33%), even when the hallux valgus angle and pain had improved. A few of the more recent trials used assessment scores that combine several aspects of the patients outcomes. These scoring systems are useful to the clinician when comparing techniques but are of dubious relevance to the patient if they do not address their main concern and such scoring systems are frequently unvalidated. Only one study simply asked the patient if they were better than before the treatment. Final outcomes were most frequently measured at one year, with a few trials maintaining follow-up for 3 years. Such time-scales are minimal given that the patients will be on their feet for at least another 20-30 years after treatment. Future research should include patient-focused outcomes, standardised assessment criteria and longer surveillance periods, more usefully in the region of 5-10 years." @default.
• W1700304324 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1700304324 creator A5031195893 @default.
• W1700304324 creator A5057564376 @default.
• W1700304324 creator A5090050285 @default.
• W1700304324 date "2009-04-15" @default.
• W1700304324 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1700304324 title "Interventions for treating hallux valgus (abductovalgus) and bunions" @default.
• W1700304324 cites W1540608446 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W1976853023 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W1984324608 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W1986892030 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W1993161485 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2015641899 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2015745252 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2023978253 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2032486094 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2033678041 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2038694817 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2042310324 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2046337851 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2081310033 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2082034933 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2082342902 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2098963902 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2100400782 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2102871712 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2134490763 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2136616531 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2148953408 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2261278344 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2268250028 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2272050160 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2276105919 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2284856733 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2316223217 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2328707850 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2983077904 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2988817733 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W4231961219 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W4248666949 @default.
• W1700304324 cites W2055509804 @default.
• W1700304324 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000964.pub3" @default.
• W1700304324 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19370560" @default.
• W1700304324 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1700304324 type Work @default.
• W1700304324 sameAs 1700304324 @default.
• W1700304324 citedByCount "58" @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242012 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242013 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242014 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242015 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242016 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242017 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242018 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242019 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242020 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242022 @default.
• W1700304324 countsByYear W17003043242023 @default.
• W1700304324 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1700304324 hasAuthorship W1700304324A5031195893 @default.
• W1700304324 hasAuthorship W1700304324A5057564376 @default.
• W1700304324 hasAuthorship W1700304324A5090050285 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C2776577363 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C2780930691 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C118552586 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C126322002 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C141071460 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C142724271 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C168563851 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C17744445 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C1862650 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C19648533 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C199539241 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C204787440 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C27415008 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C2776389721 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C2776478404 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C2776577363 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C2779473830 @default.
• W1700304324 hasConceptScore W1700304324C2780930691 @default.

• next