FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1715291244> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1715291244 abstract "The principle of complementarity whereby national courts are given priority prosecuting international crimes has often been pointed to as the cornerstone of the Rome Statute; as a key concept which permeates the entire structure and functioning of the International Criminal Court. Although the legal literature has been preoccupied with discussing the nature and scope of complementarity the Statute, until recently however the jurisprudence of the ICC has only to a limited extent dealt with a number of key issues pertaining to complementarity. However, the Court’s recent practice – a series of decisions, including the Appeals Chamber’s decisions of 30 August 2011, relating to an admissibility challenge filed by the Government of Kenya – offers a significant contribution to the understanding of complementarity. This Case Note identifies four key contributions of the ICC decisions. First, the decisions seem to present a final blow to the perception that the principle of complemetarity means that the ICC can only step in if a state with jurisdiction is unwilling or unable to investigate and prosecute the crime itself. Instead, the decisions suggest that Article 17 of the Statute entails a two-fold test, where it must first be assessed whether national proceedings in fact exists. Only to the extent this can be answered in the affirmative, is it relevant to examine whether the state in question is unwilling or unable to prosecute the crimes. Second, the Court’s decisions clarify the meaning of “inactivity”. Once an arrest warrant or a summons to appear has been issued, it is no longer sufficient for determining activity that the state with jurisdiction over the crimes conduct investigations into the violence that triggered the Court’s intervention. Instead, it is required that the state in question investigates the same person as well as the same criminal conduct. Third, the decisions set standards in terms of the evidence required for a determination that national proceedings exist. For example, the Court clarifies that a state that challenges admissibility at the case stage must provide evidence pointing to specific investigative steps already taken, as opposed to simply stating that national proceedings have commenced or offering promises that reports on their progress will be provided to the Court in the future. Finally, the decisions make a number of important clarifications concerning procedural issues, including the question of whether there is a connection between admissibility challenges and requests for assistance made under Article 93(10) of the Statute." @default.
• W1715291244 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1715291244 creator A5090774389 @default.
• W1715291244 date "2012-04-25" @default.
• W1715291244 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1715291244 title "A Critical Review of the ICC's Recent Practice Concerning Admissibility Challenges and Complementarity" @default.
• W1715291244 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1715291244 type Work @default.
• W1715291244 sameAs 1715291244 @default.
• W1715291244 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1715291244 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1715291244 hasAuthorship W1715291244A5090774389 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C202269582 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C2776916960 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C10138342 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C144024400 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C144133560 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C17319257 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C17744445 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C190253527 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C199539241 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C202269582 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C2776916960 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C2776949292 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C54355233 @default.
• W1715291244 hasConceptScore W1715291244C86803240 @default.
• W1715291244 hasLocation W17152912441 @default.
• W1715291244 hasOpenAccess W1715291244 @default.
• W1715291244 hasPrimaryLocation W17152912441 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1496378726 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1502291559 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1519211827 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1530858789 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1726975521 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1823121797 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1837478881 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W185704561 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1916895206 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W2069427669 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W2260325411 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W2507980221 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W2692194743 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W2772315735 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W30576639 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W3154957571 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W3156044642 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W829689891 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W1803899546 @default.
• W1715291244 hasRelatedWork W196598144 @default.
• W1715291244 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1715291244 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1715291244 magId "1715291244" @default.
• W1715291244 workType "article" @default.