FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W171586979> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W171586979 endingPage "211" @default.
• W171586979 startingPage "195" @default.
• W171586979 abstract "Argumentation schemes are forms of argument that model stereotypical patterns of reasoning. This paper is part of a project on the formalization of argumentation schemes. The paper shows how argumentation schemes and critical questions should be fitted into the technique of argument diagramming using the Araucaria software system. This XML-based system provides an interface through which the user can mark up a text of discourse to produce an argument diagram. We discuss several problems arising from the need to deal with enthymemes. The formulation of the set of presumptive schemes in (Walton, 1996) was rough and ready. The variables and constants used in the schemes are quite a varied bunch, and have not been all incorporated into any single over-arching formal structure. Only the most rudimentary attempt was made to classify the schemes by a tree-structure exhibiting how some fall under others. In many cases, the organization of the premises of the scheme and the matching critical questions was obviously clumsy. For example, in some instances, it seemed that the critical question merely asked whether one of the premises was true or acceptable. Thus it looked like either the premise or the critical question was redundant. These same problems were perhaps even more evident in (1963) initial attempt to introduce a comprehensive set of schemes with matching critical questions. Now that we have a new software system for argumentation diagramming that can accommodate argumentation schemes, many of these technical issues of how to clean up the schemes appear more pressing. Before this point they may have seemed relatively minor matters of detail to the working argumentation theorist or teacher of critical thinking. But now they demand our attention. In this presentation, some of the very most elementary of these technical questions of formalization of schemes are raised. As a means of arranging these questions, let us lay out our aims as desiderata for a theory of argumentation schemes. Such a theory should be This is a challenging list to tackle, not least because some of these are at odds with one another: the more fine-grained our theory is, for example, the less likely it is to be at all exhaustive. Similarly, rigorous specification is crucial for computational representation, but a siginificant barrier for application to the real world. Happily, some of the aims do hang together: simplicity, for example, works to support not only computer representation, but also diagramming and classroom teaching. This then is where we are headed. Here, we briefly describe the Araucaria computer system that supports analysis of argument (and subsequent retrieval and manipulation of argument analyses), and how that software has provided a basis for formulating further developments in a theory of argumentation schemes." @default.
• W171586979 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W171586979 creator A5073692224 @default.
• W171586979 creator A5085011444 @default.
• W171586979 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W171586979 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W171586979 title "Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions" @default.
• W171586979 cites W1527048733 @default.
• W171586979 cites W1675224294 @default.
• W171586979 cites W4206071907 @default.
• W171586979 cites W4233785899 @default.
• W171586979 cites W4256682192 @default.
• W171586979 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_16" @default.
• W171586979 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W171586979 type Work @default.
• W171586979 sameAs 171586979 @default.
• W171586979 citedByCount "40" @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792012 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792013 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792014 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792016 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792017 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792020 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792021 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792022 @default.
• W171586979 countsByYear W1715869792023 @default.
• W171586979 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W171586979 hasAuthorship W171586979A5073692224 @default.
• W171586979 hasAuthorship W171586979A5085011444 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C165064840 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C2778023277 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C2781310500 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C65059942 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C77618280 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C80444323 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C89774696 @default.
• W171586979 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C105795698 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C111472728 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C134306372 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C138885662 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C165064840 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C177264268 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C185592680 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C199360897 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C2777904410 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C2778023277 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C2781310500 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C33923547 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C41008148 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C41895202 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C55493867 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C65059942 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C77618280 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C80444323 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C89774696 @default.
• W171586979 hasConceptScore W171586979C98184364 @default.
• W171586979 hasLocation W1715869791 @default.
• W171586979 hasOpenAccess W171586979 @default.
• W171586979 hasPrimaryLocation W1715869791 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W1499281900 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W1553635644 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W1926173294 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W1999134038 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W2018745586 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W2141509767 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W2166139333 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W2355938882 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W4223621419 @default.
• W171586979 hasRelatedWork W4300853365 @default.
• W171586979 isParatext "false" @default.
• W171586979 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W171586979 magId "171586979" @default.
• W171586979 workType "book-chapter" @default.