Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1716077371> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1716077371 abstract "Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving intervention for critically ill newborn infants with respiratory failure admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Ventilating newborn infants can be challenging due to small tidal volumes, high breathing frequencies, and the use of uncuffed endotracheal tubes. Mechanical ventilation has several short-term, as well as long-term complications. To prevent complications, weaning from the ventilator is started as soon as possible. Weaning aims to support the transfer from full mechanical ventilation support to spontaneous breathing activity.To assess the efficacy of protocolized versus non-protocolized ventilator weaning for newborn infants in reducing the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, the duration of weaning, and shortening the NICU and hospital length of stay. To determine efficacy in predefined subgroups including: gestational age and birth weight; type of protocol; and type of protocol delivery. To establish whether protocolized weaning is safe and clinically effective in reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation without increasing the risk of adverse events.We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL; the Cochrane Library; 2015, Issue 7); MEDLINE In-Process and other Non-Indexed Citations and OVID MEDLINE (1950 to 31 July 2015); CINAHL (1982 to 31 July 2015); EMBASE (1988 to 31 July 2015); and Web of Science (1990 to 15 July 2015). We did not restrict language of publication. We contacted authors of studies with a subgroup of newborn infants in their study, and experts in the field regarding this subject. In addition, we searched abstracts from conference proceedings, theses, dissertations, and reference lists of all identified studies for further relevant studies.Randomized, quasi-randomized or cluster-randomized controlled trials that compared protocolized with non-protocolized ventilator weaning practices in newborn infants with a gestational age of 24 weeks or more, who were enrolled in the study before the postnatal age of 28 completed days after the expected date of birth.Four authors, in pairs, independently reviewed titles and abstracts identified by electronic searches. We retrieved full-text versions of potentially relevant studies.Our search yielded 1752 records. We removed duplicates (1062) and irrelevant studies (843). We did not find any randomized, quasi-randomized or cluster-randomized controlled trials conducted on weaning from mechanical ventilation in newborn infants. Two randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria on type of study and type of intervention, but only included a proportion of newborns. The study authors could not provide data needed for subgroup analysis; we excluded both studies.Based on the results of this review, there is no evidence to support or refute the superiority or inferiority of weaning by protocol over non-protocol weaning on duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in newborn infants." @default.
- W1716077371 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1716077371 creator A5032645561 @default.
- W1716077371 creator A5055170755 @default.
- W1716077371 creator A5064665914 @default.
- W1716077371 creator A5066224505 @default.
- W1716077371 creator A5078064583 @default.
- W1716077371 creator A5086423863 @default.
- W1716077371 date "2016-03-21" @default.
- W1716077371 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1716077371 title "Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in newborn infants" @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1911761979 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1942148108 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1964416228 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1966963224 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1981680557 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1984497369 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1990996746 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W1999658826 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2009326492 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2016402476 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2042359662 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2055246522 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2085877917 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2090132603 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2091521319 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2093043874 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2093536899 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2098324900 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2099791229 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2102306901 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2104675861 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2112166565 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2113722869 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2114545976 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2116107463 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2126738795 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2131717433 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2135421145 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2145655946 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2149325529 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2153604360 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2157414291 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2157823046 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2161177126 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2162544110 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2166191776 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W2908608952 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W4240498674 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W4248251600 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W4248390600 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W4253971867 @default.
- W1716077371 cites W4361868937 @default.
- W1716077371 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011106.pub2" @default.
- W1716077371 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26998745" @default.
- W1716077371 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W1716077371 type Work @default.
- W1716077371 sameAs 1716077371 @default.
- W1716077371 citedByCount "12" @default.
- W1716077371 countsByYear W17160773712013 @default.
- W1716077371 countsByYear W17160773712017 @default.
- W1716077371 countsByYear W17160773712018 @default.
- W1716077371 countsByYear W17160773712019 @default.
- W1716077371 countsByYear W17160773712020 @default.
- W1716077371 countsByYear W17160773712022 @default.
- W1716077371 countsByYear W17160773712023 @default.
- W1716077371 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1716077371 hasAuthorship W1716077371A5032645561 @default.
- W1716077371 hasAuthorship W1716077371A5055170755 @default.
- W1716077371 hasAuthorship W1716077371A5064665914 @default.
- W1716077371 hasAuthorship W1716077371A5066224505 @default.
- W1716077371 hasAuthorship W1716077371A5078064583 @default.
- W1716077371 hasAuthorship W1716077371A5086423863 @default.
- W1716077371 hasBestOaLocation W17160773712 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C2777080012 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C2777091541 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C2780655333 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C118552586 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C126322002 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C141071460 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C168563851 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C177713679 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C187212893 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C27415008 @default.
- W1716077371 hasConceptScore W1716077371C2776478404 @default.