Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W172193669> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 84 of
84
with 100 items per page.
- W172193669 startingPage "72" @default.
- W172193669 abstract "Investment theft losses that result from nonbusiness, for-profit transactions may qualify for advantageous tax treatment. When a client is the victim of fraud or embezzlement, for example, CPAs can reduce the client's ordinary income, recoup any previously paid taxes and minimize future tax obligations by using IRC section 165(c)(2). Be aware that CPAs who prepare and defend an investment loss deduction under IRC section 165(c)(2) must meet numerous technical requirements and make certain determinations based on examining the circumstances. Section 165(c)(2) deductions also frequently prompt IRS oversight, and in many instances, the standard tax preparation software does not adequately address this deduction, since it's generally geared to the more familiar section 1211 capital loss treatment. But while section 1211 is an appropriate treatment, using it may result in clients' paying more taxes than are required. If a client suffers an investment loss as a result of a fraudulent investment or unethical sales practice, probably the most prudent action a CPA can take, even though there is no requirement to do so, is to suggest the client first discuss it with his or her lawyer. Taxpayers are required to take reasonable action to recover a loss and not doing so disqualifies it for section 165(c)(2) treatment. If the lawyer feels there was malfeasance and it is not practical to pursue recovery due to a lack of recoverable assets, the cost of litigation or other reasons, the loss probably is deductible in the current period. Losses from embezzlement, blackmail, kidnapping for ransom, burglary, larceny, extortion and threats also may qualify for section 165 treatment. THEFT LOSS VS, CAPITAL LOSS Section 165(c)(2) theft loss deductions can be more advantageous than capital loss ones for the following reasons: * As ordinary deductions, they're not subject to limitations imposed by IRC section 1211. * They're not miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor imposed under section 67(a). * They're excluded from the phase-out of itemized deductions required by section 68(b). * Theft losses that exceed a taxpayer's gross income give rise to net operating losses that can be carried back three years or forward for 20 years. * They can be used to reduce a taxpayer's tax liability to zero without resulting in any liability for alternative minimum tax (AMT). DETERMINE THEFT LOSS In Edwards v. Bromberg, 232 F2d 107 (5th Cir. 1956), the court defined theft as a word of general and broad connotation, covering any criminal appropriation of another's property by swindling, false pretenses or any other form of guile. The court also stated that whether a loss from theft occurred depended on the law of the jurisdiction where it was sustained and the exact nature of the crime. If a transaction did not amount to theft in the state where the loss was sustained, then section 165(c)(2) is not applicable. RECOGNIZE FRAUD For section 165(c)(2) to be applicable, there must be scienter, that is, requisite knowledge of the wrongness or illegality of an act. In Ottmann v. Hanger Orthopedic Group, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that scienter could be established by pleading not only intentional misconduct, but also severe recklessness. The court further found a plaintiff must meet the requirement of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Congress did not specify what would or would not show a strong inference of scienter, so a case-specific analysis is appropriate to determine it. …" @default.
- W172193669 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W172193669 creator A5032170339 @default.
- W172193669 date "2005-04-01" @default.
- W172193669 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W172193669 title "Maximize Tax Benefits under IRC Section 165: CPAs Often Overlook the Deductibility of Investment Theft Losses" @default.
- W172193669 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W172193669 type Work @default.
- W172193669 sameAs 172193669 @default.
- W172193669 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W172193669 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W172193669 hasAuthorship W172193669A5032170339 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C172008318 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C181622380 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C27548731 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C2776360696 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C2776529561 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C2776829726 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C551662922 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C74939039 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C77269340 @default.
- W172193669 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C100001284 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C10138342 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C121955636 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C139719470 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C144133560 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C162118730 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C162324750 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C172008318 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C175444787 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C17744445 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C181622380 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C199539241 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C202565627 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C27548731 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C2776360696 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C2776529561 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C2776829726 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C551662922 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C74939039 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C77269340 @default.
- W172193669 hasConceptScore W172193669C94625758 @default.
- W172193669 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W172193669 hasLocation W1721936691 @default.
- W172193669 hasOpenAccess W172193669 @default.
- W172193669 hasPrimaryLocation W1721936691 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W1030649190 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W128012338 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W1498355140 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W158769260 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W162388162 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W2219697648 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W2262139051 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W2273416754 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W2293686410 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W2587421378 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W2616073390 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W270279326 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W2803381008 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W290512980 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W3113634507 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W3122764986 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W329130889 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W335009475 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W67978734 @default.
- W172193669 hasRelatedWork W80142532 @default.
- W172193669 hasVolume "199" @default.
- W172193669 isParatext "false" @default.
- W172193669 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W172193669 magId "172193669" @default.
- W172193669 workType "article" @default.