FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1722499319> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1722499319 endingPage "842" @default.
• W1722499319 startingPage "S" @default.
• W1722499319 abstract "Background and aims: While symptoms and complications from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) such as heartburn, esophageal stricture, bleeding, and Barrett's esophagus are commonly known, dental complications of GERD may go unrecognized. The prevalence of dental erosion in subjects with GERD is poorly described. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of dental erosion in a population diagnosed with GERD. The association between dental erosion and salivary flow, salivary buffering capacity and dietary acidic challenges was also assessed. Methods: Subjects were recruited from The University of North Carolina's Center for Esophageal Disease and Swallowing with a physician diagnosis of GERD, and typical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. Subjects received a basic dental exam using the Basic Erosive Wear Exam (BEWE, table); the general population has about a 10% prevalence of erosive wear. Subjects provided a stimulated salivary sample which was used to determine their stimulated salivary flow rate and salivary buffering capacity. A diet diary was given to the subjects to complete for 4 days which was used to calculate daily average acidic challenges. Xerostomia was defined as a flow rate less than 0.1mL/minute. Salivary flow was considered low risk if flow rate was between 0.7-0.1 mL/ minute. Salivary buffering was considered high risk if pH was below 4.0. while the risk was considered moderate if pH was between 4.0-4.9. Simple percentages are reported. Results: To date, 22 GERD subjects (13 female, 9 male) have been enrolled. Of these, 41% have moderate erosive wear (BEWE cumulative score 9-13), 50% have low erosive wear (BEWE score 3-8), and 9% show no erosive wear (BEWE score 0-2) Stimulated salivary flow rate was normal for 77% of the subjects, low for 18.5% and 4.5% of the subjects had xerostomia. Salivary buffering capacity was normal for 46% of the subjects while, 36% were at high risk and 18% of the subjects were at moderate risk. Dietary acidic challenges were low for 50% of the subjects, moderate for 35.7% and high for 14.3%. Conclusion: A high proportion of subjects with GERD show erosive wear of their teeth. Inadequate salivary flow or buffering capacity may in part explain this defect. BEWE Criteria for Grading Erosive Wear" @default.
• W1722499319 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1722499319 creator A5005139471 @default.
• W1722499319 creator A5012642973 @default.
• W1722499319 creator A5021436476 @default.
• W1722499319 creator A5047585189 @default.
• W1722499319 creator A5075039402 @default.
• W1722499319 date "2013-05-01" @default.
• W1722499319 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W1722499319 title "Tu1776 The Risk of Dental Erosion in GERD Patients As Measured by the Basic Erosive Wear Examination" @default.
• W1722499319 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(13)63133-9" @default.
• W1722499319 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1722499319 type Work @default.
• W1722499319 sameAs 1722499319 @default.
• W1722499319 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1722499319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1722499319 hasAuthorship W1722499319A5005139471 @default.
• W1722499319 hasAuthorship W1722499319A5012642973 @default.
• W1722499319 hasAuthorship W1722499319A5021436476 @default.
• W1722499319 hasAuthorship W1722499319A5047585189 @default.
• W1722499319 hasAuthorship W1722499319A5075039402 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C114793014 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C123157820 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C2777014526 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C2909334127 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C114793014 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C123157820 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C126322002 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C127313418 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C156887251 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C199343813 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C2777014526 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C2779134260 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C2909334127 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C43270747 @default.
• W1722499319 hasConceptScore W1722499319C71924100 @default.
• W1722499319 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1722499319 hasLocation W17224993191 @default.
• W1722499319 hasOpenAccess W1722499319 @default.
• W1722499319 hasPrimaryLocation W17224993191 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W1985344947 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W2160707420 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W2417637497 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W2611458798 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W1722499319 hasRelatedWork W4248773171 @default.
• W1722499319 hasVolume "144" @default.
• W1722499319 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1722499319 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1722499319 magId "1722499319" @default.
• W1722499319 workType "article" @default.