FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W172663475> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W172663475 endingPage "374" @default.
• W172663475 startingPage "362" @default.
• W172663475 abstract "Although academic dishonesty is known to be prevalent in institutions of higher education, little research has examined the role that differences in disciplinary techniques used in childhood play in its occurrence. This study investigated the relationship between specific disciplinary practices, particularly harsh physical discipline, and the level of academic misconduct in college. Using an online survey, 231 students from three colleges responded to questions regarding their participation in college cheating, satisfaction with family relations, and parental disciplinary practices. Consistent with past studies, 80% of the participants in the study endorsed engaging in some form of cheating in college. In addition, 35% of the sample reported experiencing at least some form of severe physical discipline (e.g., being slapped) during childhood. A hierarchical regression revealed that students who reported experiencing more severe forms of physical discipline engaged in higher levels of academic dishonesty. The use of less punitive disciplinary techniques, including spanking, and family satisfaction was not associated with increased college cheating. The deleterious effect that severe physical punishment may have on moral development and parent-child attachment may explain the study's findings. ********** Many studies, both professional and popular, have found that academic dishonesty in its various forms is a significant problem on college campuses, with prevalence rates running upward to 80% among students (e.g., Gabriel, 2010; McCabe, 2005; Robinson, Amburgey, Swank, & Faulkner, 2004). Cheating compromises the educational process by creating a way for students to claim they have mastered the core concepts of a particular discipline without having done so. Engaging in academically dishonest practices also provides an unfair advantage for students who cheat over those who do not by allowing those who cheat to spend less time on scholastic tasks than those who are honest. Finally, cheating in college reinforces a pattern of dishonest behavior that is likely to occur again in the professional lives of students once they enter the work force (Alt & Geiger, 2012; Lupton & Chapman, 2002). Previous researchers have investigated many environmental and personal factors associated with academic dishonesty. Environmental factors found to influence the prevalence of academic dishonesty include the quality of students' secondary education (Jackson, Levine, Fumham, & Burr, 2002), perceived sanctions against cheating on college campuses (Robinson et al., 2004), childhood background in a collectivistic versus individualistic culture (Alt & Geiger, 2012; Martin, Rao, & Sloan, 2011), and perceptions regarding the normalcy of cheating among students at different institutions (Whitley, 1998). Individual differences associated with cheating in college courses have included gender, with men found to cheat more than women (McCabe, 2005; Niiya, Ballantyne, North, & Crocker, 2008); previous cheating (Harding, Mayhew, Finelli, & Carpenter, 2007; Sieman, 2009); lower prior academic performance (Nathanson, Paulhus, & Williams, 2006); college major (e.g., business) (Harding, Mayhew, Finelli, & Carpenter, 2007; McCabe, 2005), and personality traits such as honesty, intrinsic motivation, and neuroticism (Brunell, Staats, Barden, & Hupp, 2011; Jordan, 2011; Staats, Hupp, & Hagley, 2008; Stone, Kisamore, & Jawahar, 2008). Differences in parenting techniques also may relate to academic dishonesty among college students. For example, Estep and Olson (2011) investigated whether those who perceived lower levels of parental involvement and warmth during childhood would endorse more favorable attitudes toward cheating in college. However, these investigators failed to find a significant correlation between parental warmth/involvement and more tolerant attitudes toward academic dishonesty. …" @default.
• W172663475 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W172663475 creator A5000069631 @default.
• W172663475 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W172663475 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W172663475 title "The Relationship between Disciplinary Practices in Childhood and Academic Dishonesty in College Students" @default.
• W172663475 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W172663475 type Work @default.
• W172663475 sameAs 172663475 @default.
• W172663475 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W172663475 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W172663475 hasAuthorship W172663475A5000069631 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C166735990 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C2776603611 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C2778024590 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C2778881941 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C2780587575 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C8795937 @default.
• W172663475 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C138496976 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C144024400 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C15744967 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C166735990 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C17744445 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C199539241 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C2776603611 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C2778024590 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C2778881941 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C2780587575 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C3017944768 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C36289849 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C71924100 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C77805123 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C8795937 @default.
• W172663475 hasConceptScore W172663475C99454951 @default.
• W172663475 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W172663475 hasLocation W1726634751 @default.
• W172663475 hasOpenAccess W172663475 @default.
• W172663475 hasPrimaryLocation W1726634751 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W140236623 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W1519579404 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W1572118415 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W160960589 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W1945064234 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W1990364363 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2009978271 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2046752453 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2137592788 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2140878020 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2170346484 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2515220253 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2567334886 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2593136195 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2792670111 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W2921512418 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W3123951629 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W39389648 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W73962296 @default.
• W172663475 hasRelatedWork W96304297 @default.
• W172663475 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W172663475 isParatext "false" @default.
• W172663475 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W172663475 magId "172663475" @default.
• W172663475 workType "article" @default.