FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1732081237> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1732081237 endingPage "640" @default.
• W1732081237 startingPage "634" @default.
• W1732081237 abstract "Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant abutment material on peri‐implant soft tissue color using intraoral spectrophotometric analysis and to compare the clinical outcomes with patient and clinician perception and satisfaction. Materials and Methods Thirty patients and four prosthodontic faculty members participated. Abutments were zirconia, gold‐hued titanium, and titanium. Peri‐implant mucosa color of a single anterior implant restoration was compared to the patient's control tooth. Spectrophotometric analysis using SpectroShade TM Micro data determined the color difference (ΔE, ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) between the midfacial peri‐implant soft tissue for each abutment material and the marginal gingiva of the control tooth. Color difference values of the abutment groups were compared using ANOVA (α = 0.05). Patient and clinician satisfaction surveys were also conducted using a color‐correcting light source. The results of each patient and clinician survey question were compared using chi‐square analysis (α = 0.05). Pearson correlation analyses identified the relationship between the total color difference (ΔE) and the patient/clinician perception and satisfaction, as well as between ΔE and tissue thickness. Results Zirconia abutments displayed significantly smaller spectrophotometric gingival color difference (ΔE) compared to titanium and gold‐hued titanium abutments (respectively, 3.98 ± 0.99; 7.22 ± 3.31; 5.65 ± 2.11; p < 0.05). Among ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*, only Δa* (red‐green spectrum) showed significant difference between groups. There was no significant correlation between measured soft tissue thickness and ΔE, but thick gingival phenotype, determined by a probe test, demonstrated a smaller ΔE than thin phenotype (4.82 ± 1.49; 6.41 ± 3.27; p = 0.097). There was no statistical difference in patient or clinician satisfaction among abutment materials, and no correlation between ΔE and the patient and clinician satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher than clinician, and patient‐perceived differences were lower than clinicians’ ( p < 0.01). Clinicians’ satisfaction was higher for gingival (pink) esthetics than crown (white) esthetics ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Peri‐implant mucosa with zirconia abutments demonstrated significantly lower mean color difference compared to titanium or gold‐hued titanium abutments as measured spectrophotometrically; however, no statistical difference in patient or clinician perception/satisfaction among abutment materials was demonstrated. Patients were significantly more satisfied than clinicians." @default.
• W1732081237 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1732081237 creator A5007773117 @default.
• W1732081237 creator A5018502939 @default.
• W1732081237 creator A5026350340 @default.
• W1732081237 creator A5062094797 @default.
• W1732081237 date "2015-09-23" @default.
• W1732081237 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W1732081237 title "Abutment Material Effect on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color and Perceived Esthetics" @default.
• W1732081237 cites W1970823073 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W1981704977 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W1995367568 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2044870573 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2046580101 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2082537983 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2105720773 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2138962023 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2139204678 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2148305055 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2157569732 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W2167075089 @default.
• W1732081237 cites W6713664 @default.
• W1732081237 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12360" @default.
• W1732081237 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26398106" @default.
• W1732081237 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1732081237 type Work @default.
• W1732081237 sameAs 1732081237 @default.
• W1732081237 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372016 @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372017 @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372018 @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372019 @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372020 @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372021 @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372022 @default.
• W1732081237 countsByYear W17320812372023 @default.
• W1732081237 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1732081237 hasAuthorship W1732081237A5007773117 @default.
• W1732081237 hasAuthorship W1732081237A5018502939 @default.
• W1732081237 hasAuthorship W1732081237A5026350340 @default.
• W1732081237 hasAuthorship W1732081237A5062094797 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C186991048 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C2908906697 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C48777230 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C506065880 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C106131492 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C126322002 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C127413603 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C136948725 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C141071460 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C147176958 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C186991048 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C191897082 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C192562407 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C199343813 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C2775944032 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C2781411149 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C2908906697 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C29694066 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C3018023364 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C31972630 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C41008148 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C48777230 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C506065880 @default.
• W1732081237 hasConceptScore W1732081237C71924100 @default.
• W1732081237 hasFunder F4320311622 @default.
• W1732081237 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1732081237 hasLocation W17320812371 @default.
• W1732081237 hasLocation W17320812372 @default.
• W1732081237 hasOpenAccess W1732081237 @default.
• W1732081237 hasPrimaryLocation W17320812371 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W1994205211 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W2061096432 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W2262194645 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W2356378295 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W2523803457 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W2530589489 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W2746048982 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W3213914796 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W4280638436 @default.
• W1732081237 hasRelatedWork W4384108205 @default.
• W1732081237 hasVolume "25" @default.

• next