FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1738768815> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1738768815 abstract "Acredita-se que o exercicio resistido (ER) em plataformas instaveis pode resultar em uma maior demanda para o sistema neuromuscular, aumentando a ativacao dos musculos estabilizadores do tronco, o que representa um estresse adicional aos musculos esqueleticos quando comparado com a superficie da plataforma estavel. O objetivo deste estudo foi o de comparar a percepcao subjetiva de esforco (PSE), atraves da escala OMNI-RES e o numero de repeticoes maximas (RM), realizada a 80% de 1RM no exercicio supino reto entre as superficies instavel e estavel. A amostra foi composta por 10 mulheres treinadas (idade 22,5 ± 3,30). O teste de 1RM foi aplicado para a previsao de acoes voluntarias maximas musculares (AVMM), descritos por Kraemer, Ratamess (2004). O supino reto no banco a 80% de 1RM ate a falha muscular concentrica, sem alterar o padrao de movimento, foi realizado 48h apos a previsao das AVMM e o supino reto na plataforma instavel (bola suica) 48h apos a plataforma estavel. Para comparacao da percepcao subjetiva de esforco ( OMNI-RES ) e o numero de repeticoes maximas em relacao ao teste na plataforma estavel e instavel, foi aplicado o ‘ t-test de Student ’ para amostras pareadas. Em todos os casos foi adotado um nivel de significância de 0.05. A analise estatistica foi realizada pelo software de processamento e analise estatistica Package for Social (SPSS Science , Chicago, EUA), versao 17.0. ABSTRACT Comparative study of maximum number of reps and perception subjective effort It is believed that resistance exercise on unstable platforms may result in a greater demand for the neuromuscular system, increasing the activation of the stabilizing muscles of the trunk, which represents an additional stress to the skeletal muscles compared with the surface of stable platform. The aim of this study was to compare the perceived exertion by OMNI-RES scale and the number of repetitions performed at 80% of 1RM in the bench press exercise between stable and unstable surfaces. The sample consisted of 10 trained women (age 22.5 ± 3.30). The 1RM test was applied for predicting maximal voluntary muscle actions (MVMA), described by Kraemer, Ratamess (2004). The bench press at the bank at 80% of 1RM until concentric muscular failure, without changing the movement pattern was performed 48h after the forecast of MVMA the bench press and the platform unstable (swiss ball) 48h after stable platform. For comparison of perceived exertion (OMNI-RES) and the number of repetitions regarding testing in stable and unstable platform, the 'Student t-test' was applied for paired samples. In all cases we adopted a significance level of 0.05. analysis was performed by processing and statistical analysis software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Science,Chicago,USA), version 17.0." @default.
• W1738768815 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1738768815 creator A5010942516 @default.
• W1738768815 creator A5019981792 @default.
• W1738768815 creator A5065356752 @default.
• W1738768815 date "2015-08-01" @default.
• W1738768815 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1738768815 title "Estudo comparativo do número de repetições máximas e da percepção subjetiva de esforço" @default.
• W1738768815 cites W194145145 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W1964474827 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W1966089956 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W1979860400 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W1991138082 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W1996460158 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2008699585 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2013117898 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2019146101 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2027104950 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2032695661 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2037281290 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2043148208 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2059027461 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2060600418 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2061710224 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2068865027 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2069126849 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2072860764 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2086200271 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2097198989 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2261801531 @default.
• W1738768815 cites W2403538431 @default.
• W1738768815 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1738768815 type Work @default.
• W1738768815 sameAs 1738768815 @default.
• W1738768815 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1738768815 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1738768815 hasAuthorship W1738768815A5010942516 @default.
• W1738768815 hasAuthorship W1738768815A5019981792 @default.
• W1738768815 hasAuthorship W1738768815A5065356752 @default.
• W1738768815 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1738768815 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W1738768815 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1738768815 hasConceptScore W1738768815C142362112 @default.
• W1738768815 hasConceptScore W1738768815C15708023 @default.
• W1738768815 hasConceptScore W1738768815C15744967 @default.
• W1738768815 hasLocation W17387688151 @default.
• W1738768815 hasOpenAccess W1738768815 @default.
• W1738768815 hasPrimaryLocation W17387688151 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W135163757 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W1557907936 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W2111865594 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W2123836397 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W2248387313 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W2562642622 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W3203105381 @default.
• W1738768815 hasRelatedWork W1832118649 @default.
• W1738768815 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1738768815 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1738768815 magId "1738768815" @default.
• W1738768815 workType "article" @default.