FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1750409081> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1750409081 endingPage "937" @default.
• W1750409081 startingPage "925" @default.
• W1750409081 abstract "Criminology & Public PolicyVolume 10, Issue 4 p. 925-937 POLICY ESSAY The cattle call of reentry Not all processes are equal Faye S. Taxman, Faye S. Taxman George Mason UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Faye S. Taxman, Faye S. Taxman George Mason UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 November 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00780.xCitations: 3 Faye S. Taxman, Department of Criminology, Law and Society, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030 (e-mail: [email protected]). Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Blader, Steven L. and Tom R. Tyler. 2003. A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29: 747– 758. Feeley, Malcolm M. 1992. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York : Russell Sage Foundation. Friedmann, Peter D., Elizabeth C. Katz, Anne G. Rhodes, Faye S. Taxman, Daniel J. O’Connell, Linda K. Frisman, et al . 2008. Collaborative behavioral management for drug-involved parolees: Rationale and design of the Step’n Out Study. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47: 290– 318. Griffith, James D., Grace A. Rowan-Szal, Ryan R. Roark, and D. Dwayne Simpson. 2000. Contingency management in outpatient methadone treatment: a meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 58: 55– 66. Lattimore, Pamela K., Danielle M. Steffey, and Christy A. Visher. 2009. Prisoner Reentry Experiences of Adult Males: Characteristics, Service Receipt, and Outcomes of Participants in the SVORI Multisite Evaluation. Research Triangle Park , NC : RTI International. Retrieved September 7, 2011 from http://ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/230419.pdf. Légaré, France, Glyn Elwyn, Martin Fishbein, Pierre Frémont, Dominick Frosch, Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al. 2008. Translating shared decision-making into health care clinical practices: Proof of concepts. Implementation Science, 3: 2. Lussier, Jennifer Plebani, Sarah H. Heil, Joan A. Mongeon, Gary J. Badger, and Stephen T. Higgins. 2006. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101: 192– 203. Marlowe, Douglas B. 2006. When “what works” never did: Dodging the “scarlet M” in correctional rehabilitation. Criminology & Public Policy, 5: 339– 346. National Institutes on Drug Abuse. 2000. Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-Based Guide. NIH Publication No. 00–4180. Rockville , MD : Author. Paternoster, Raymond, Robert Brame, Ronet Bachman, and Lawrence W. Sherman. 1997. Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31: 163– 204. Petry, Nancy M., Sheila M. Alessi, David M. Ledgerwood, and Sean Sierra. 2010. Psychometric properties of the contingency management competence scale. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 109: 167– 174. Prendergast, Michael, Linda Frisman, Joann Y. Sachs, Michele Staton-Tindall, Lisa Greenwell, Hsiu-Ju Lin, et al. 2011. A multi-site, randomized study of strengths-based case management with substance-abusing parolees. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7: 225– 253. Prendergast, Michael, Deborah Podus, John Finney, L. Greenwell, and John Roll. 2006. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 101: 1546– 1560. Rudes, Danielle, Faye S. Taxman, Shannon Portillo, Amy Murphy, Anne Rhodes, Maxine Stitzer, Peter Luongo, Peter D. Friedmann, M.D. (in press, 2011), Adding positive reinforcements in justice settings: Acceptability & feasibility. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. Skogan, Wesley G. and Kathleen Frydl. 2004. Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Washington , DC : National Academies Press. Stitzer, Maxine L., Nancy M. Petry, and Jessica Peirce. 2010. Motivational incentives research in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38: S61– S69. Taxman, Faye S. and Steven Belenko. 2011. Implementing Evidence-Based Practices in Community Corrections and Addiction Treatment. New York : Springer-Verlag. Tyler, Tom R. 2000. Multiculturalism and the willingness of citizens to defer to law and to legal authorities. Law & Social Inquiry, 25: 983– 1019. Tyler, Tom R. 2003. Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 30: 283. Tyler, Tom R. 2010. Legitimacy in corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 9: 127– 134. Tyler, Tom R. and E. Allan Lind. 2002. Procedural justice. In (Joseph Sanders and V. Lee Hamilton, Eds.), Handbook of Justice Research in Law. Boston , MA : Kluwer Academic. Wilson, James A. and Robert C. Davis. 2006. Good intentions meet hard realities: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight reentry program. Criminology & Public Policy, 5: 303. Wright, Kevin A. and Jeffrey W. Rosky. 2011. Too early is too soon: Lessons from the Montana Department of Corrections Early Release Program. Criminology & Public Policy. This issue. Citing Literature Volume10, Issue4November 2011Pages 925-937 ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W1750409081 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1750409081 creator A5077303184 @default.
• W1750409081 date "2011-11-01" @default.
• W1750409081 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1750409081 title "The cattle call of reentry" @default.
• W1750409081 cites W1984307980 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W1990194436 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2032682078 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2039338482 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2044359197 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2053617299 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2058405051 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2076950612 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2082106851 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2085445225 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2087413870 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2095695118 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2098623632 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2113280329 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2140893254 @default.
• W1750409081 cites W2269015068 @default.
• W1750409081 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00780.x" @default.
• W1750409081 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1750409081 type Work @default.
• W1750409081 sameAs 1750409081 @default.
• W1750409081 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W1750409081 countsByYear W17504090812014 @default.
• W1750409081 countsByYear W17504090812015 @default.
• W1750409081 countsByYear W17504090812019 @default.
• W1750409081 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1750409081 hasAuthorship W1750409081A5077303184 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C67101536 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C144024400 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C154945302 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C15744967 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C161191863 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C17744445 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C199539241 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C2778805511 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C2780876879 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C41008148 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C542102704 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C67101536 @default.
• W1750409081 hasConceptScore W1750409081C73484699 @default.
• W1750409081 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1750409081 hasLocation W17504090811 @default.
• W1750409081 hasOpenAccess W1750409081 @default.
• W1750409081 hasPrimaryLocation W17504090811 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2002562887 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2494198209 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2495982710 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2808406825 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2809029402 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2899722511 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W2952338356 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W4238218832 @default.
• W1750409081 hasRelatedWork W4245577766 @default.
• W1750409081 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W1750409081 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1750409081 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1750409081 magId "1750409081" @default.
• W1750409081 workType "article" @default.