FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1751147946> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1751147946 endingPage "1005" @default.
• W1751147946 startingPage "998" @default.
• W1751147946 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Apr 2016Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks Timothy M. Kowalewski, Robert Sweet, Thomas S. Lendvay, Ashleigh Menhadji, Timothy Averch, Geoffrey Box, Timothy Brand, Michael Ferrandino, Jihad Kaouk, Bodo Knudsen, Jaime Landman, Benjamin Lee, Bradley F. Schwartz, and Elspeth McDougall Timothy M. KowalewskiTimothy M. Kowalewski Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota Financial interest and/or other relationship with C-SATS and Simulab. More articles by this author , Robert SweetRobert Sweet Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Thomas S. LendvayThomas S. Lendvay Department of Urology, University of Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington Financial interest and/or other relationship with C-SATS. More articles by this author , Ashleigh MenhadjiAshleigh Menhadji Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Timothy AverchTimothy Averch University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Geoffrey BoxGeoffrey Box Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Cleveland, Ohio No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Timothy BrandTimothy Brand Madigan Army Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Tacoma, Washington No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Michael FerrandinoMichael Ferrandino Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina Financial interest and/or other relationship with TransEnterix. More articles by this author , Jihad KaoukJihad Kaouk Columbus and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Bodo KnudsenBodo Knudsen Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Cleveland, Ohio No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Jaime LandmanJaime Landman Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , Benjamin LeeBenjamin Lee Department of Urology and Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana Financial interest and/or other relationship with Journal of Endourology, Argos and Porges™. More articles by this author , Bradley F. SchwartzBradley F. Schwartz Division of Urology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author , and Elspeth McDougallElspeth McDougall Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.087AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Standardized assessment of laparoscopic skill in urology is lacking. We investigated whether the AUA (American Urological Association) BLUS (Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills) skill tasks are valid to address this need. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board approved study included 27 medical students, 42 urology residents, 18 fellows and 37 faculty urologists across 8 sites. Using the EDGE (Electronic Data Generation and Evaluation) device (Simulab, Seattle, Washington) 454 recordings were collected on peg transfer, pattern cutting, suturing and clip applying tasks, which together comprise the expert determined BLUS tasks. We collected synchronized video and tool motion data for each trial. For each task errors, time, path length, economy of motion, peak grasp force and EDGE score were collected. An expert panel of 5 faculty members performed GOALS (Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) evaluations on a representative subset of peg transfer and suturing skill tasks performed by 24 participants (IRR = 0.95). Results: Demographically derived skill levels proved unsuitable to evaluate construct validity. Separation of mean scores by grouped skill levels was strongest for the suturing task. Objective motion metrics and errors supported construct validity vis-à-vis correlation with blinded expert video ratings (motion metrics R2 = 0.95, p <0.01). Expert scores appeared to reward errors in suturing but not in block transfer. Conclusions: BLUS skill task performance scoring can discriminate among basic laparoscopic technical skill levels. Self-reported demographics are an unreliable source of determining laparoscopic technical skill. References 1 : Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg1998; 175: 482. Google Scholar 2 : FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks. J Gastrointest Surg2008; 12: 210. Google Scholar 3 : Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery2004; 135: 21. Google Scholar 4 : Beyond task time: automated measurement augments fundamentals of laparoscopic skills methodology. J Surg Res2014; 192: 329. Google Scholar 5 : Introduction and validation of the American Urological Association Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery Skills curriculum. J Endourol2012; 26: 190. Google Scholar 6 : Stratification of expert vs novice laparoscopists using the Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery (BLUS) curriculum at a single institution. J Surg Educ2015; 72: 964. Google Scholar 7 : AUA BLUS Handbook of Laparoscopic and Robotic Fundamentals. Linthicum: American Urological Association2015; . Google Scholar 8 : A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg2005; 190: 107. Google Scholar 9 : Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg1997; 84: 273. Google Scholar 10 : My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Meas2004; 64: 391. Google Scholar 11 : Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas2007; 1: 77. Google Scholar 12 : Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills: a novel method to evaluate surgical performance. J Surg Res2013; 187: 65. Google Scholar 13 : Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills: an adjunct to urology resident surgical simulation training. J Endourol2014; 29: 604. Google Scholar 14 : Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills: differentiating animate surgical skill through the wisdom of crowds. J Endourol2015; 29: 1183. Google Scholar 15 : Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skill: a valid method for discriminating basic robotic surgery skills. J Endourol2015; 29: 1295. Google Scholar © 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byNoureldin Y and Sweet R (2017) A Call for a Shift in Theory and Terminology for Validation Studies in Urological EducationJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 3, (617-620), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018.Hung A, Chen J, Jarc A, Hatcher D, Djaladat H and Gill I (2017) Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 1, (296-304), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.Lee J, Andonian S, Pace K and Grober E (2016) Basic Laparoscopic Skills Assessment Study: Validation and Standard Setting among Canadian Urology TraineesJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 6, (1539-1544), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017.Kowalewski T, Comstock B, Sweet R, Schaffhausen C, Menhadji A, Averch T, Box G, Brand T, Ferrandino M, Kaouk J, Knudsen B, Landman J, Lee B, Schwartz B, McDougall E and Lendvay T (2016) Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills for Validation of Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills TasksJournal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 6, (1859-1865), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Volume 195Issue 4 Part 1April 2016Page: 998-1005Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsvalidation studieseducationclinical competencelaparoscopy/standardsurologic surgical procedures/educationmedicalMetricsAuthor Information Timothy M. Kowalewski Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota Financial interest and/or other relationship with C-SATS and Simulab. More articles by this author Robert Sweet Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Thomas S. Lendvay Department of Urology, University of Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington Financial interest and/or other relationship with C-SATS. More articles by this author Ashleigh Menhadji Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Timothy Averch University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Geoffrey Box Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Cleveland, Ohio No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Timothy Brand Madigan Army Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Tacoma, Washington No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Michael Ferrandino Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina Financial interest and/or other relationship with TransEnterix. More articles by this author Jihad Kaouk Columbus and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Bodo Knudsen Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Cleveland, Ohio No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Jaime Landman Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Benjamin Lee Department of Urology and Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana Financial interest and/or other relationship with Journal of Endourology, Argos and Porges™. More articles by this author Bradley F. Schwartz Division of Urology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Elspeth McDougall Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada No direct or indirect commercial incentive associated with publishing this article. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W1751147946 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5000426391 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5014972618 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5015880984 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5016882863 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5018550453 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5019615102 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5020982696 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5036712517 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5068011236 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5069213962 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5076683627 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5080304698 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5082924158 @default.
• W1751147946 creator A5086310747 @default.
• W1751147946 date "2016-04-01" @default.
• W1751147946 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1751147946 title "Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks" @default.
• W1751147946 cites W1947943371 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W1967883805 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W1968732724 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2004731704 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2015807465 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2031548072 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2061504941 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2072503051 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2085884860 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2107835408 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2145482311 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2188053957 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W2331734555 @default.
• W1751147946 cites W4255599054 @default.
• W1751147946 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.087" @default.
• W1751147946 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26527514" @default.
• W1751147946 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W1751147946 type Work @default.
• W1751147946 sameAs 1751147946 @default.
• W1751147946 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W1751147946 countsByYear W17511479462016 @default.
• W1751147946 countsByYear W17511479462017 @default.
• W1751147946 countsByYear W17511479462018 @default.
• W1751147946 countsByYear W17511479462019 @default.
• W1751147946 countsByYear W17511479462020 @default.
• W1751147946 countsByYear W17511479462021 @default.
• W1751147946 countsByYear W17511479462023 @default.
• W1751147946 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5000426391 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5014972618 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5015880984 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5016882863 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5018550453 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5019615102 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5020982696 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5036712517 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5068011236 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5069213962 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5076683627 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5080304698 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5082924158 @default.
• W1751147946 hasAuthorship W1751147946A5086310747 @default.
• W1751147946 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W1751147946 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1751147946 hasConceptScore W1751147946C19527891 @default.
• W1751147946 hasConceptScore W1751147946C71924100 @default.
• W1751147946 hasIssue "4 Part 1" @default.
• W1751147946 hasLocation W17511479461 @default.
• W1751147946 hasLocation W17511479462 @default.
• W1751147946 hasOpenAccess W1751147946 @default.
• W1751147946 hasPrimaryLocation W17511479461 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W1751147946 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W1751147946 hasVolume "195" @default.
• W1751147946 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1751147946 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1751147946 magId "1751147946" @default.
• W1751147946 workType "article" @default.