FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1752689086> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1752689086 abstract "The issue about the right to work full time has been debated for long time. The demand for the right to work full time is driven by the trade union movement as well as by politicians. It can be hard to earn a living when you work part-time, and from that aspect the part-time worker has an entitled interest to ask for such a high employment rate as possible. On the other hand the employer has an interest to fit his organization to match the production, or in the retail trade sector, to the customers behaviour. In many ways, these two interests directly contravene to each other, and if the interests of one part is satisfied the other part’s interest is violated. It is this relation between the employer’s managerial prerogative and the employment protection I have chosen to examine. I have chosen to look at two typical cases. One is when the employer through a reorganisation wants to convert full-time jobs into part-time jobs, or wants to decrease the employment rate of existent part-time jobs. The other typical case is when an employee due to section 25 a of the 1982:80 Employment Protection Act wants to increase his employment rate and it contradicts to the organization the employer wants to have.In two important cases the Labour Court dealt with both of these typical cases in the summer of 2012, and these cases - Labour Court judgement AD 2012:47 and Labour Court judgement AD 2012:41 are central in my thesis, even though my conclusions are based on several cases from the Labour Court and on doctrine.Shortage of work considered to be objective ground for notice of termination. The term shortage of work is negatively defined. Termination grounds that are not related to the employee personally is defined as shortage of work. It means that if an employer wants to make a reorganisation where part-time jobs replace full-time jobs and its necessary to terminate employees, these notices of termination is based on shortage of work. These notices of termination is objectively grounded if the employer has conducted a careful and serious assessment of the future needs. My conclusion is that the requirement for the employer to show that he has conducted a careful and serious assessment are relatively low.I have also concluded that an employer who wants to decrease the employment rate of an employee’s when such a reorganisation is done probably can do it without having to apply the rules on priority, and consequently can evade the purposes of the 1982:80 Employment Protection Act.When it comes to an employee who wants to increase his employment rate it basically requires a vacancy that correspond to the desired employment rate of the employee, otherwise the employer don’t have to satisfy the desire. The interest of the employer in obtaining control over his organization outweighs the interest of the employee in increasing his employment rate." @default.
• W1752689086 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1752689086 creator A5081128409 @default.
• W1752689086 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W1752689086 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1752689086 title "Förändrad sysselsättningsgrad – förhållandet mellan arbetsledningsrätten och anställningstryggheten" @default.
• W1752689086 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1752689086 type Work @default.
• W1752689086 sameAs 1752689086 @default.
• W1752689086 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1752689086 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1752689086 hasAuthorship W1752689086A5081128409 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C10144844 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C145236788 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C2776548248 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C2779670817 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C2909356555 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C3020690005 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C10144844 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C127413603 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C144133560 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C145236788 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C162324750 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C17744445 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C18762648 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C199539241 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C2776548248 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C2779670817 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C2909356555 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C3020690005 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C78519656 @default.
• W1752689086 hasConceptScore W1752689086C94625758 @default.
• W1752689086 hasLocation W17526890861 @default.
• W1752689086 hasOpenAccess W1752689086 @default.
• W1752689086 hasPrimaryLocation W17526890861 @default.
• W1752689086 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1752689086 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1752689086 magId "1752689086" @default.
• W1752689086 workType "article" @default.