FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1752945896> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1752945896 endingPage "557" @default.
• W1752945896 startingPage "534" @default.
• W1752945896 abstract "I A Court Drama for an Unperformed Drama II Purposes of this Study III Conventional Wisdom on Interim Measures IV A Different Picture V Overview of the Swedish Regulation A Basic Principles B The General Provision VI A Definitive Provisional Measure? VII The Inevitable Substitute to Litigation VIII Flexible and Prospective Enforcement of Justice I. A COURT DRAMA FOR AN UN-PERFORMED DRAMA Let me begin by telling a story about a court drama that took place in the Swedish city of Malmo. Once upon a time--or just over a decade ago, to be more precise--the theatre company was about to stage the world premier of Jacques Prevet's play LES ENFANTS DE PARADIS. Just a few hours before the first performance, the district court in Malmo issued an injunction with immediate effect, forbidding the performance of the play. Earlier that day, before lunch, the playwright's heir applied to the district court (1) for an interim injunction. A judge granted the injunction a few hours later after finding that Hipp was about to commit copyright infringement. He found an immediate injunction was necessary in order to protect the copyright owner from the harms that might be caused by an unauthorized performance of the play. The judge granted an immediate injunction because the court could not deliver a judgment on the case's merits in time to prevent such harms. A subsequent judgment would be equally ineffective because it would be unable to repair the damages that would have already occurred. The court's injunction was an interim order valid indefinitely until the case settled in a final judgment. The order also set out a fine of 100,000 Swedish crowns payable by the theatre company for each breach of the injunction. (2) Hipp, however, did not breach the order. The theatre company cancelled the premier at the last minute and chose instead to let the legal drama play out in the court. The issue involved in this case was whether Hipp intended to perform the play without permission from the rightful owner, thereby committing copyright infringement. The heir to Prevet claimed that irreparable damages would be done to the renommee of the playwright if the performance were to go ahead as planned. Hipp had, of course, an entirely different view of the matter. It claimed that the parties had already reached an oral agreement a few months earlier regarding the right to perform the work. According to Hipp, only further details remained to be settled concerning the amount of compensation to Jacques Prevet's heir for the theatre's acquisition of the performing rights. The agreement was based on an understanding that the theatre made great economic and personnel investments in the preparation of the play for the world premier. The theatre asserted that the heir was fully aware of those circumstances. Hipp successfully appealed the district court's injunction. This success, however, was short-lived. The court of appeals actually quashed the injunction; (3) finding that the application for an interim injunction was defective on one point: the amount of security offered by the heir. The heir offered a certain amount of security against the damages Hipp might suffer due to a wrongful injunction. Unlike the district court, the court of appeals found that the amount proposed was too low and instead offered a figure it deemed more appropriate. After presenting the additional securities, the heir turned again to the district court for a new interim injunction on Hipp's performance of the play. At this point, the theatre company had second thoughts on letting the drama play out in the courts. The parties agreed on a settlement and never demanded judgment. Hipp compensated Prevet's heir for the theatre's right to perform the play, and the world premier could be held. This copyright drama was over in a little more than a week, a considerably shorter time than it would have taken to settle the dispute through the ordinary process of civil litigation. …" @default.
• W1752945896 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1752945896 creator A5043934464 @default.
• W1752945896 date "2007-12-22" @default.
• W1752945896 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1752945896 title "Interim measures and civil litigation" @default.
• W1752945896 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1752945896 type Work @default.
• W1752945896 sameAs 1752945896 @default.
• W1752945896 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1752945896 countsByYear W17529458962018 @default.
• W1752945896 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1752945896 hasAuthorship W1752945896A5043934464 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C153180980 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C2776957806 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C2777381055 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C523419034 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C538833194 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C124952713 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C139621336 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C142362112 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C153180980 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C17744445 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C199539241 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C2776949292 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C2776957806 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C2777381055 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C2779777834 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C41008148 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C523419034 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C538833194 @default.
• W1752945896 hasConceptScore W1752945896C77088390 @default.
• W1752945896 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1752945896 hasLocation W17529458961 @default.
• W1752945896 hasOpenAccess W1752945896 @default.
• W1752945896 hasPrimaryLocation W17529458961 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2048373929 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W212499134 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2218867265 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2229405723 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2254410527 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2262617141 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2291327564 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2306593025 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W233852459 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W249805452 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2585525131 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2594206242 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2917879874 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W308234495 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W331110643 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W591870155 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W92055672 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W2187250964 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W3123420016 @default.
• W1752945896 hasRelatedWork W7579407 @default.
• W1752945896 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W1752945896 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1752945896 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1752945896 magId "1752945896" @default.
• W1752945896 workType "article" @default.