FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1753219132> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1753219132 abstract "The study examines two evangelical penal substitutionary theologies of atonement presented by John Stott and Ellen White. It adopts a descriptive and analytic approach to examine the respective atonement theologies of both authors. Chapter 1 introduces the purpose of the dissertation and the methodology adopted. Chapter 2 examines the different theories of atonement in Christian theology. Chapters 3 and 4 examine the respective atonement theologies of Stott and White. Chapter 5 is a comparative analysis of the concept of atonement in both authors, while chapter 6 summarizes the conclusions of the study. -- Purpose. The purpose of the research is to describe, analyze, and compare the concept of atonement as articulated in the theological writings of Stott and White. The study endeavors to explore the contrasting scope of atonement present in the two respective theological systems. It also aims at discovering whether there are any evangelical theological bases for a rapprochement between Stott‘s atonement theology (which is centered on the cross) and that of White (which is also centered on the cross, but also includes the heavenly sanctuary ministry of Christ). Additionally, the research also aims at finding out the reasons for the differences in their atonement theologies, since they both subscribe to the penal substitutionary view. Another goal of the research is to discover any distinctive contributions that both theologies might have made to the Christian theology of atonement. -- Method. In order to bring out the similarities and differences between the two theologies of atonement, the study examines their respective assumptions, presuppositions, and methodology. Other relevant criteria used in the comparative study include the centrality of the cross, the achievement of the cross, atonement as substitution, the high priestly ministry of Christ, and the scope of the atonement. -- Conclusion. The conclusion of the study reveals that the atonement theologies of Stott and White reveal a common commitment to two pillars of evangelicalism, namely the supreme authority of Scripture and the penal substitutionary view of atonement. However, critical differences between the two theologies in their respective presuppositions in their doctrines of God in relation to atonement on the cross versus atonement in stages, the extent of the atonement, the issue of the revocability of justification, the cosmic controversy theme, and the high priestly ministry of Christ seem to account for the differences observed in the theologies. Overall, White‘s theology seems to be broader in its presentation of the scope of the atonement and seems to be more consistent with the scriptural evidence. It is hoped that the renewed interest in the judgment aspect of the atonement by some evangelical theologians in recent times may lead to a more sympathetic examination of the broader view of White on atonement in the wider evangelical theological arena." @default.
• W1753219132 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1753219132 creator A5021297255 @default.
• W1753219132 date "2023-04-24" @default.
• W1753219132 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1753219132 title "A Comparative Study of the Concept of Atonement in the Writings of John R. W. Stott and Ellen G. White" @default.
• W1753219132 cites W144158224 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1484742125 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1486933667 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1487533513 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1495530647 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1496487713 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1508122966 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1510856047 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1518607117 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1521034474 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1528616296 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1537010629 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1555542661 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1559389564 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1563388098 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1563775922 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1564912737 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1583820166 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1585928155 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1588018309 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1589986819 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1590441604 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1594783187 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1594962546 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1602983369 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1832289449 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1985306786 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W1989965577 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2074582818 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2076532520 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2089163929 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2093314156 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2098497639 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2172504107 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2179598631 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2180345447 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2203548735 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2496341933 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2613783400 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2799259001 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2804643369 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2905550816 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W2970348453 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W560447208 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W563109352 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W563983181 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W569255047 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W575620460 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W576374184 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W579140291 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W582609525 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W588959239 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W592309195 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W592512261 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W593887081 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W598590927 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W598719429 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W600583686 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W601578363 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W610255427 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W612996469 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W633619275 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W637616638 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W639485883 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W651816211 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W655768123 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W3190384998 @default.
• W1753219132 cites W645159089 @default.
• W1753219132 doi "https://doi.org/10.32597/dissertations/117/" @default.
• W1753219132 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W1753219132 type Work @default.
• W1753219132 sameAs 1753219132 @default.
• W1753219132 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1753219132 countsByYear W17532191322020 @default.
• W1753219132 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W1753219132 hasAuthorship W1753219132A5021297255 @default.
• W1753219132 hasBestOaLocation W17532191321 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C2775858633 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C521751864 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConcept C56273599 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C104317684 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C111472728 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C138885662 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C185592680 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C27206212 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C2775858633 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C521751864 @default.
• W1753219132 hasConceptScore W1753219132C55493867 @default.

• next