FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1759628393> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1759628393 endingPage "58" @default.
• W1759628393 startingPage "44" @default.
• W1759628393 abstract "ABSTRACT Creating representative networks of marine protected areas (MPAs) as part of an ecosystem‐based management approach is generally advocated to protect the full spectrum of marine ecosystems and vulnerable species. Core objectives for designing MPA networks incorporate issues of scale, size and spacing. Ascertaining when such objectives have been met, and thus when a network can be judged to be ecologically coherent, presents an ongoing challenge. This paper presents a broad‐scale approach to assess the degree of ecological coherence within one such network. In 2013 an independent ecological coherence assessment was requested by OSPAR, the Regional Seas Convention for the North‐east Atlantic, of the ecological coherence of its regional MPA network. As is often the case in the marine environment, the data were not sufficiently comprehensive or spatially inclusive to allow for a thorough assessment for the entire region. Consequently two levels of testing were applied: (1) basic tests applied to the whole OSPAR maritime area; and (2) a more sophisticated second level of tests directed at specific OSPAR regions and subregions for which more complete datasets were available. The former considered major gaps based on basic distribution thresholds and representativity (both biogeographic and bathymetric). The latter focused on broad‐scale habitat presence to determine replication, adequacy and connectivity. On the basis of these tests it was concluded that while the OSPAR MPA network as a whole is not ecologically coherent, nonetheless significant progress towards global targets, such as protection of 10% of marine and coastal environments under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has been made. Gaps in the distribution of MPAs were identified, particularly under‐representation of certain biogeographic provinces and bathymetric zones of depths greater than 75 m including bathyal (200–3000 m) and abyssal (3000–6000 m) depths. To address such gaps, a cooperative region by region approach will be required by the OSPAR Parties to identify where positioning new MPAs can enhance ecological coherence. A limitation of the 2013 assessment was that it did not consider which MPAs are designated and managed for the protection of specific features; rather, it assumed that all features that fall within an MPA are protected. With a redevelopment of the OSPAR MPA database underway it is hoped that reporting of such details by Parties will improve, allowing for more specificity in future analyses. However, as the first such assessment of its kind our two‐level approach serves as a case study of a pragmatic example of how assessments of ecologically coherent networks might be undertaken using GIS to contribute to systematic conservation planning. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd." @default.
• W1759628393 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5000274971 @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5007181438 @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5027643529 @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5039934388 @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5049536935 @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5087540618 @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5089622498 @default.
• W1759628393 creator A5089756433 @default.
• W1759628393 date "2014-11-01" @default.
• W1759628393 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1759628393 title "When is a marine protected area network ecologically coherent? A case study from the North-east Atlantic" @default.
• W1759628393 cites W1561497455 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W1923495213 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W1967599703 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W1969712035 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W1984609091 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W1996339063 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W1998973265 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2001456918 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2021616472 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2037437290 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2053366034 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2063187997 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2075246893 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2079845856 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2092966363 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2096408232 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2100010621 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2103297716 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2108541593 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2211762710 @default.
• W1759628393 cites W2503014672 @default.
• W1759628393 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2510" @default.
• W1759628393 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1759628393 type Work @default.
• W1759628393 sameAs 1759628393 @default.
• W1759628393 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932014 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932016 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932017 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932018 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932019 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932020 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932021 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932022 @default.
• W1759628393 countsByYear W17596283932023 @default.
• W1759628393 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5000274971 @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5007181438 @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5027643529 @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5039934388 @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5049536935 @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5087540618 @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5089622498 @default.
• W1759628393 hasAuthorship W1759628393A5089756433 @default.
• W1759628393 hasBestOaLocation W17596283931 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C110872660 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C151152651 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C174943157 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C2779485152 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C505870484 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C68800169 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C107826830 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C110872660 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C130217890 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C151152651 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C174943157 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C185933670 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C18903297 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C205649164 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C2778755073 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C2779485152 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C39432304 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C505870484 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C58640448 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C68800169 @default.
• W1759628393 hasConceptScore W1759628393C86803240 @default.
• W1759628393 hasIssue "S2" @default.
• W1759628393 hasLocation W17596283931 @default.
• W1759628393 hasOpenAccess W1759628393 @default.
• W1759628393 hasPrimaryLocation W17596283931 @default.
• W1759628393 hasRelatedWork W2079453989 @default.
• W1759628393 hasRelatedWork W2093955561 @default.
• W1759628393 hasRelatedWork W2124565737 @default.
• W1759628393 hasRelatedWork W2184233180 @default.
• W1759628393 hasRelatedWork W2559806838 @default.
• W1759628393 hasRelatedWork W2791027254 @default.

• next