FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1762614621> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1762614621 endingPage "e200" @default.
• W1762614621 startingPage "e191" @default.
• W1762614621 abstract "The prevalence of chronic conditions in Europe has been the subject of health-political reforms that have increasingly targeted collaboration between public, private and voluntary organisations for the purpose of supporting self-management of long-term diseases. The international literature describes collaboration across sectors as challenging, which implies that their respective logics are conflicting or incompatible. In line with the European context, recent Norwegian health policy advocates inter-sectorial partnerships. The aim of this policy is to create networks supporting better self-management for people with chronic conditions. The purpose of our qualitative study was to map different understandings of self-management support in private for-profit, volunteer and public organisations. These organisations are seen as potential self-management support networks for individuals with chronic conditions in Norway. From December 2012 to April 2013, we conducted 50 semi-structured interviews with representatives from relevant health and well-being organisations in different parts of Norway. According to the theoretical framework of institutional logic, representatives’ statements are embedded with organisational understandings. In the analysis, we systematically assessed the representatives’ different understandings of self-management support. The institutional logic we identified revealed traits of organisational historical backgrounds, and transitions in understanding. We found that the merging of individualism and fellowship in contemporary health policy generates different types of logic in different organisational contexts. The private for-profit organisations were concerned with the logic of a healthy appearance and mindset, whereas the private non-profit organisations emphasised fellowship and moral responsibility. Finally, the public, illness-oriented organisations tended to highlight individual conditions for illness management. Different types of logic may attract different users, and simultaneously, a diversity of logic types may challenge collaboration at the user's expense. Moral implications embed institutional logic implying a change towards individual responsibility for disease. Policy makers ought to consider complexities of logic in order to tailor the different needs of users." @default.
• W1762614621 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1762614621 creator A5023854264 @default.
• W1762614621 creator A5038228586 @default.
• W1762614621 creator A5043514648 @default.
• W1762614621 creator A5048254064 @default.
• W1762614621 date "2015-10-01" @default.
• W1762614621 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1762614621 title "Institutional logic in self-management support: coexistence and diversity" @default.
• W1762614621 cites W1585040966 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W1957986735 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W1982867025 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2015098902 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2021144903 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2031108653 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2042133263 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2047024840 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2059345379 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2063586810 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2072515151 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2072731074 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2074201874 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2082525302 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2097229421 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2102391756 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2105379339 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2113421427 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2116884614 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2118200556 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2120167690 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2122340269 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2137930589 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2149883824 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2152034421 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2159890500 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2160379593 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W2490706970 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W3124522757 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W4238399289 @default.
• W1762614621 cites W4253151780 @default.
• W1762614621 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12277" @default.
• W1762614621 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26429669" @default.
• W1762614621 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1762614621 type Work @default.
• W1762614621 sameAs 1762614621 @default.
• W1762614621 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W1762614621 countsByYear W17626146212016 @default.
• W1762614621 countsByYear W17626146212018 @default.
• W1762614621 countsByYear W17626146212019 @default.
• W1762614621 countsByYear W17626146212020 @default.
• W1762614621 countsByYear W17626146212021 @default.
• W1762614621 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1762614621 hasAuthorship W1762614621A5023854264 @default.
• W1762614621 hasAuthorship W1762614621A5038228586 @default.
• W1762614621 hasAuthorship W1762614621A5043514648 @default.
• W1762614621 hasAuthorship W1762614621A5048254064 @default.
• W1762614621 hasBestOaLocation W17626146211 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C147859227 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C2778491294 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C2779366050 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C2781316041 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C47936135 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConcept C63428231 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C111472728 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C138885662 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C144024400 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C147859227 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C17744445 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C190248442 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C199539241 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C2778491294 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C2779366050 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C2781316041 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C3116431 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C36289849 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C39549134 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C41895202 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C47936135 @default.
• W1762614621 hasConceptScore W1762614621C63428231 @default.
• W1762614621 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1762614621 hasLocation W17626146211 @default.
• W1762614621 hasLocation W17626146212 @default.
• W1762614621 hasOpenAccess W1762614621 @default.
• W1762614621 hasPrimaryLocation W17626146211 @default.
• W1762614621 hasRelatedWork W1521602341 @default.
• W1762614621 hasRelatedWork W1976229202 @default.
• W1762614621 hasRelatedWork W2115581903 @default.

• next