FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1766302578> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1766302578 endingPage "e193" @default.
• W1766302578 startingPage "e193" @default.
• W1766302578 abstract "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are statements that provide recommendations to optimize patient care for a specific clinical problem or question. Merely reading a guideline rarely leads to implementation of recommendations. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has a formal process of guideline development and dissemination. The last few years have seen a burgeoning of social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, and newer methods of dissemination such as podcasts and webinars. The role of these media in guideline dissemination has not been studied. Systematic evaluation of dissemination methods and comparison of the effectiveness of newer methods with traditional methods is not available. It is also not known whether specific dissemination methods may be more effectively targeted to specific audiences.Our aim was to (1) develop an innovative dissemination strategy by adding social media-based dissemination methods to traditional methods for the AAN clinical practice guidelines Complementary and alternative medicine in multiple sclerosis (CAM in MS) and (2) evaluate whether the addition of social media outreach improves awareness of the CPG and knowledge of CPG recommendations, and affects implementation of those recommendations.Outcomes were measured by four surveys in each of the two target populations: patients and physicians/clinicians (physicians). The primary outcome was the difference in participants' intent to discuss use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) with their physicians or patients, respectively, after novel dissemination, as compared with that after traditional dissemination. Secondary outcomes were changes in awareness of the CPG, knowledge of CPG content, and behavior regarding CAM use in multiple sclerosis (MS).Response rates were 25.08% (622/2480) for physicians and 43.5% (348/800) for patients. Awareness of the CPG increased after traditional dissemination (absolute difference, 95% confidence interval: physicians 36%, 95% CI 25-46, and patients 10%, 95% CI 1-11) but did not increase further after novel dissemination (physicians 0%, 95% CI -11 to 11, and patients -4%, 95% CI -6 to 14). Intent to discuss CAM also increased after traditional dissemination but did not change after novel dissemination (traditional: physicians 12%, 95% CI 2-22, and patients 19%, 95% CI 3-33; novel: physicians 11%, 95% CI -1 to -21, and patients -8%, 95% CI -22 to 8). Knowledge of CPG recommendations and behavior regarding CAM use in MS did not change after either traditional dissemination or novel dissemination.Social media-based dissemination methods did not confer additional benefit over print-, email-, and Internet-based methods in increasing CPG awareness and changing intent in physicians or patients. Research on audience selection, message formatting, and message delivery is required to utilize Web 2.0 technologies optimally for dissemination." @default.
• W1766302578 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5022729721 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5028298954 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5028663301 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5036836837 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5037629255 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5053659607 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5060405461 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5075179772 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5087926025 @default.
• W1766302578 creator A5088547182 @default.
• W1766302578 date "2015-08-13" @default.
• W1766302578 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1766302578 title "The Impact of Social Media on Dissemination and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Longitudinal Observational Study" @default.
• W1766302578 cites W1702965718 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W1977937183 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W1982385004 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W1987271805 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W1989003516 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W1990637701 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W1994307831 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2004819935 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2008590410 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2018430029 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2022107377 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2024722741 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2035033210 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2040877423 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2048745540 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2057208333 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2059999671 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2068327320 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2072918930 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2081776798 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2107555787 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2107767582 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2117276061 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2117594687 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2132190848 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2142965988 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2142997506 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2145396615 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2152606399 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2153311123 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2161885506 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2168079428 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2168880871 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2197566569 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2316227975 @default.
• W1766302578 cites W2410068600 @default.
• W1766302578 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4414" @default.
• W1766302578 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4736287" @default.
• W1766302578 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26272267" @default.
• W1766302578 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1766302578 type Work @default.
• W1766302578 sameAs 1766302578 @default.
• W1766302578 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782015 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782016 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782017 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782018 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782019 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782020 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782021 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782022 @default.
• W1766302578 countsByYear W17663025782023 @default.
• W1766302578 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5022729721 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5028298954 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5028663301 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5036836837 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5037629255 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5053659607 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5060405461 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5075179772 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5087926025 @default.
• W1766302578 hasAuthorship W1766302578A5088547182 @default.
• W1766302578 hasBestOaLocation W17663025781 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C101780184 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2777921204 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2778729106 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2779494480 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2780182762 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2780222150 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2781286702 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2781400479 @default.
• W1766302578 hasConcept C2984752397 @default.

• next