FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1772959056> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1772959056 endingPage "462" @default.
• W1772959056 startingPage "437" @default.
• W1772959056 abstract "In an implementation of an ERP system in a large Danish production company, the ways in which the participants made sense of the project changed appreciably during the course of the project. At the start of the project, the predominant mode of thinking was classical, with many actors thinking of the implementation as a standard IT project. Later in the project, this way of thinking had changed: the majority viewed the implementation as an organizational change program. Clearly the experience of the project had changed the sense making of the participants to some extent. We used three theoretical frameworks to investigate and explain this change. Technological frames (Orlikowski and Gash 1994) helped us distinguish the different styles of sense making, but bound particular social groups to particular frames in a way that was not consistent with the empirical situation. Alvesson and Willmott’s (1996) levels of discourse provided a richer picture of inter-linking and evolving styles of sense making, and of actors’ fluency in moving between one and another, but provided no explanation of how or why one discourse should take over from another. In order to explain this change, it was necessary to add actions and outcomes to the picture, and for this a later theoretical contribution of Orlikowski (2000) was useful. In the practice lens, Orlikowski extends her work on structuration theory and technology. Here sense making (structure) and action are dependent upon each other in an emergent process. Since none of these theoretical perspectives offered a convincing explanation of the change in sense making at Omega, it was necessary to construct a new theoretical model in the light of our analysis. Now it was possible to understand how actions (taken in the light of the dominant technological discourse about the ERP implementation) produced outcomes perceived as unfavorable, and how an alternative discourse providing more tolerable and convenient sense making took over." @default.
• W1772959056 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1772959056 creator A5046860453 @default.
• W1772959056 creator A5074074124 @default.
• W1772959056 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W1772959056 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1772959056 title "Dominant Technological Discourses in Action: Paradigmatic Shifts in Sense Making in the Implementation of an ERP System" @default.
• W1772959056 cites W153425739 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W1964500652 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W1996293917 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2039954778 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2050401924 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2052707681 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2101419153 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2126549818 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2127089424 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2137323523 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2141951329 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2151335841 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2162213353 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2169736278 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W2170021374 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W3183765052 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W4230279294 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W4231255394 @default.
• W1772959056 cites W4248367074 @default.
• W1772959056 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35634-1_21" @default.
• W1772959056 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W1772959056 type Work @default.
• W1772959056 sameAs 1772959056 @default.
• W1772959056 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W1772959056 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W1772959056 hasAuthorship W1772959056A5046860453 @default.
• W1772959056 hasAuthorship W1772959056A5074074124 @default.
• W1772959056 hasBestOaLocation W17729590561 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C2777199835 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C10138342 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C111472728 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C121332964 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C138885662 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C144024400 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C162324750 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C182306322 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C2777199835 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C2780791683 @default.
• W1772959056 hasConceptScore W1772959056C62520636 @default.
• W1772959056 hasLocation W17729590561 @default.
• W1772959056 hasOpenAccess W1772959056 @default.
• W1772959056 hasPrimaryLocation W17729590561 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W1963991205 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W2013572114 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W2117217484 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W2122538383 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W2320230442 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W2935747636 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W2945375867 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W3141339938 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W1669044802 @default.
• W1772959056 hasRelatedWork W2144391062 @default.
• W1772959056 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1772959056 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1772959056 magId "1772959056" @default.
• W1772959056 workType "book-chapter" @default.