FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W177639055> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W177639055 abstract "Current teacher educators are being challenged to find opportunities for their preservice teachers to develop both competence in, and confidence for, integrating technology into their curricula. Given the difficulty involved in trying to arrange successful classroom technology experiences for preservice teachers, this study was designed to examine whether electronic models of exemplary technology-using teachers, presented via CD-ROM, could provide a viable alternative for developing ideas about and self-efficacy for technology integration. Sixty-nine students enrolled in a one-credit technology course completed demographic and online survey instruments before and after interacting with a CD-ROM that featured six teachers' classroom technology beliefs and practices. Results suggest that electronic models can significantly increase preservice teachers' ideas about and self-efficacy for technology integration. Furthermore, students found the examples of teachers included.on the CD-ROM to be both realistic and relevant. Implications are discussed, as well as suggestions for future research. (Contains 30 references.) (Author/AEF) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Increasing Preservice Teachers' Capacity for Technology Integration Through Use of Electronic Models PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) f1 This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. By: Peggy A. Ertmer, Deborah Conklin & Judith Lewandowski En COPY AVAIIIIABLIE Increasing Preservice Teachers' Capacity for Technology Integration Through Use of Electronic Models Peggy A. Ertmer Deborah Conklin Judith Lewandowski Purdue University Abstract Current teacher educators are being challenged to find opportunities for their preservice teachers to develop both competence in, and confidence for, integrating technology into their curricula. Given the difficulty involved in trying to arrange successful classroom technology experiences for preservice teachers, this study was designed to examine whether electronic models of exemplary technology-using teachers, presented via CD-ROM, could provide a viable alternative for developing ideas about and self-efficacy for technology integration. Sixty-nine students enrolled in a one-credit technology course completed demographic and online survey instruments before and after interacting with a CD-ROM that featured six teachers' classroom technology beliefs and practices. Results suggest that electronic models can significantly increase preservice teachers' ideas about and self-efficacy for technology integration. Furthermore, students' found the examples of teachers included on the CD-Current teacher educators are being challenged to find opportunities for their preservice teachers to develop both competence in, and confidence for, integrating technology into their curricula. Given the difficulty involved in trying to arrange successful classroom technology experiences for preservice teachers, this study was designed to examine whether electronic models of exemplary technology-using teachers, presented via CD-ROM, could provide a viable alternative for developing ideas about and self-efficacy for technology integration. Sixty-nine students enrolled in a one-credit technology course completed demographic and online survey instruments before and after interacting with a CD-ROM that featured six teachers' classroom technology beliefs and practices. Results suggest that electronic models can significantly increase preservice teachers' ideas about and self-efficacy for technology integration. Furthermore, students' found the examples of teachers included on the CDROM to be both realistic and relevant. Implications are discussed as well as suggestions for future research. Introduction According to the most recent report of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, 2000), nearly 70 percent of teachers report not feeling well prepared to use computers and the Internet in their teaching. The 1998 Technology in Education Report (Market Data Retrieval) noted that only 7 percent of schools, nationwide, boast a majority of teachers at an advanced skill level (i.e., able to integrate technology into the curriculum). Even among our newest teachers, instructional use is not as high as might be expected. Contrary to popular belief, preservice and beginning teachers do not use computers significantly more than their more experienced colleagues (Hadley & Sheingold, 1993; NCES, 2000; Sherwood, 1993). Although beginning teachers report wanting to use computers, and have gained adequate technical skills, they typically lack knowledge about how to integrate computers within the more routine tasks of teaching and managing their classrooms (Hruskocy, 1999; Novak & Knowles, 1991). Skills vs. Ideas Clearly, the growing increase in teachers' technical is insufficient to guarantee the effective use of technology in the classroom (Carvin, 1999; Marcinkiewicz, 1994). In order to translate into practice, teachers need specific ideas about how to use these to achieve meaningful outcomes under normal classroom conditions. Traditionally, inservice technology training programs have been softwarerather than curriculum-based (Gilmore, 1995). Thus, teachers completed technology courses still not knowing how to create or implement smallor whole-group activities that incorporated meaningful uses of technology (Moersch, 1995). Unfortunately, this also has been true for most teacher education technology courses (Moursund & Bielefeldt, 1999; Yildirim, 2000). Although the majority of teacher preparation programs now require that students take three or more credit hours of technology instruction, recent survey data suggested that most teacher education faculty still do not feel that technology use is being effectively modeled for our future teachers (Schrum, 1999). Simply stated, few of our current or future teachers have either observed or experienced with or from computers (Carlson & Gooden, 1999). While today's teachers are expected to leverage the full potential of powerful conceptual technology. tools to meet the changing needs of their students, they have been given few, if any, opportunities to develop their own visions for, or ideas about, meaningful technology use. The importance of developing a vision for technology use cannot be overstated (Ertmer, 1999). As noted by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1993): Most teachers will find little incentive to tackle the technical and scheduling problems associated with technology unless they have a clear vision of how the technology can improve teaching and learning (p. 83). Once a clear vision is in place, specific tools and strategies are needed to help teachers address the many unique challenges posed by the translation/integration process: changing roles of teachers, students, and technology; classroom organization, management, and security issues; and assessment methods, among others. As Dexter, Anderson, and Becker (1999) explained, For teachers to implement any new instructional strategy, they must acquire new knowledge about it and then weave this together with the demands of the curriculum, classroom management, and existing instructional skills (p. 223). Teachers need information about how, as well as why, to use technology in meaningful ways. Lack of knowledge regarding either element can significantly decrease the potential impact that these powerful resources might have on student learning. BEST COPY AVAILABLE 3" @default.
• W177639055 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W177639055 creator A5038493805 @default.
• W177639055 creator A5058210195 @default.
• W177639055 creator A5071346973 @default.
• W177639055 date "2001-11-01" @default.
• W177639055 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W177639055 title "Increasing Preservice Teachers' Capacity for Technology Integration through Use of Electronic Models." @default.
• W177639055 cites W1506613595 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1535618319 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1549412575 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1562208008 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1568871075 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1575892017 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1577474567 @default.
• W177639055 cites W160705998 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1608277174 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1968529788 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1975703000 @default.
• W177639055 cites W1993955037 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2017091077 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2017753702 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2021547501 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2029466242 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2038867181 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2062340342 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2096294317 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2165868487 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2187745912 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2991764537 @default.
• W177639055 cites W782973409 @default.
• W177639055 cites W83118770 @default.
• W177639055 cites W2184353870 @default.
• W177639055 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W177639055 type Work @default.
• W177639055 sameAs 177639055 @default.
• W177639055 citedByCount "61" @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552012 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552013 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552014 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552015 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552016 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552017 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552018 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552019 @default.
• W177639055 countsByYear W1776390552022 @default.
• W177639055 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W177639055 hasAuthorship W177639055A5038493805 @default.
• W177639055 hasAuthorship W177639055A5058210195 @default.
• W177639055 hasAuthorship W177639055A5071346973 @default.
• W177639055 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W177639055 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W177639055 hasConcept C16443162 @default.
• W177639055 hasConcept C2778048005 @default.
• W177639055 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W177639055 hasConceptScore W177639055C145420912 @default.
• W177639055 hasConceptScore W177639055C15744967 @default.
• W177639055 hasConceptScore W177639055C16443162 @default.
• W177639055 hasConceptScore W177639055C2778048005 @default.
• W177639055 hasConceptScore W177639055C41008148 @default.
• W177639055 hasLocation W1776390551 @default.
• W177639055 hasOpenAccess W177639055 @default.
• W177639055 hasPrimaryLocation W1776390551 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1514138309 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1535618319 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1556808170 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1562208008 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1571958129 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1575892017 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1590154464 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1966370548 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W1968529788 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2023644883 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2058732148 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2114081079 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2116199508 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2123184471 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2140369176 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2149355902 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2151920968 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W2168389316 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W79250569 @default.
• W177639055 hasRelatedWork W83118770 @default.
• W177639055 isParatext "false" @default.
• W177639055 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W177639055 magId "177639055" @default.
• W177639055 workType "article" @default.