FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1781799541> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1781799541 endingPage "5" @default.
• W1781799541 startingPage "5" @default.
• W1781799541 abstract "AbstractThe didactics of history and the content of the curriculum and syllabi have changed over the years in order to make history more relevant for the students of today. It is important to provide students with “knowing what” knowledge in addition to “knowing how” knowledge in order to support and develop critical thinking and historical understanding. One way of promoting historical understanding is through introducing the concepts of historical thinking. However, studies show that history classes often promote teaching that is still quite traditional, using history books uncritically and without problematizing their truthfulness, which do not make students see how history is formed, nor how it can be important for the present and the future. The present article explores whether the concepts of historical thinking are encouraged and used in three different lower secondary schools in Norway today. The main sources of data are current history textbooks, teaching plans, tests and assignments. The findings of the study show that the concepts of historical thinking are not made clear and explicit enough in neither history books, plans nor tests. Furthermore, it seems like reproduction rather than reflection is focused on in many classrooms, making it difficult to develop a historical understanding. It is therefore suggested that both teachers and students learn and work thoroughly with the concepts of historical thinking.schools in Norway today. History books in use, plans, tests and assignments were considered important empirical information for the research question. The findings of the study show that the concepts of historical thinking are not clear enough neither in history books, plans nor tests. Furthermore, it seems like reproduction rather than reflections are practiced in many classrooms, making it difficult to get a historical understanding. To accomplish historical understanding it is suggested that both teachers and students learn and work thoroughly with the concepts of historical thinking.Sammendrag I tråd med samfunnsendringer og endringer i skolen har historiedidaktikken og læreplanene i historie blitt endret for å gjøre historiefaget mer relevant for elevene i dag. For å utvikle elevenes kritiske tenkning og historieforståelse bør elevene tilegne seg både ”vite at- kunnskap” og ”vite hvordan - kunnskap”. En måte å fremme historieforståelse på, er gjennom introduksjon av historisk tenkning. Studier utført i klasserommet viser imidlertid at historieundervisningen fortsatt er forholdsvis tradisjonell i den forstand at lærebøker i historie anvendes ukritisk, uten å problematisere hvordan historie konstrueres eller hvorfor historie er viktig både i dag og for fremtida. Denne artikkelen ser på hvorvidt og hvordan historisk tenkning fremmes og anvendes i tre ulike skoler på ungdomstrinnet. Lærebøker i historie, ukeplaner, halvårsplaner, prøver og oppgaver danner hovedgrunnlaget for empirien i denne undersøkelsen. Funnene i undersøkelsen viser at historisk tenkning er lite tydelig i lærebøker, planer eller i prøver og oppgaver. Samtidig ser det ut til at det fokuseres mer på reproduksjon enn refleksjon i klasserommet, noe som vanskeliggjør historisk forståelse. Det foreslås derfor at både lærere og studenter arbeider mer grundig med historisk tenkning. Nøkkelord: Historiedidaktikk, historieforståelse, historisk tenkning, læreplaner" @default.
• W1781799541 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1781799541 creator A5028546258 @default.
• W1781799541 date "2015-03-03" @default.
• W1781799541 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W1781799541 title "The Norwegian curriculum in history and historical thinking: a case study of three lower secondary schools" @default.
• W1781799541 doi "https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.1301" @default.
• W1781799541 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1781799541 type Work @default.
• W1781799541 sameAs 1781799541 @default.
• W1781799541 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1781799541 countsByYear W17817995412018 @default.
• W1781799541 countsByYear W17817995412021 @default.
• W1781799541 countsByYear W17817995412023 @default.
• W1781799541 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1781799541 hasAuthorship W1781799541A5028546258 @default.
• W1781799541 hasBestOaLocation W17817995411 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C106165879 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C139228662 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C2777004525 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C2778548054 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C45504901 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C533356498 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C10138342 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C106165879 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C111472728 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C138885662 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C139228662 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C144024400 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C145420912 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C15744967 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C162324750 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C182306322 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C19417346 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C2777004525 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C2778548054 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C36289849 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C45504901 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C47177190 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C533356498 @default.
• W1781799541 hasConceptScore W1781799541C88610354 @default.
• W1781799541 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1781799541 hasLocation W17817995411 @default.
• W1781799541 hasLocation W17817995412 @default.
• W1781799541 hasLocation W17817995413 @default.
• W1781799541 hasOpenAccess W1781799541 @default.
• W1781799541 hasPrimaryLocation W17817995411 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W1531028619 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W1781799541 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W1986036947 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W2038339285 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W2052146163 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W2414540018 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W2488019140 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W2566325614 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W2823779660 @default.
• W1781799541 hasRelatedWork W3132208335 @default.
• W1781799541 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W1781799541 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1781799541 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1781799541 magId "1781799541" @default.
• W1781799541 workType "article" @default.