Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W179622534> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- W179622534 abstract "The integrity of the safety case depends primarily on the quality of the reasoning embodied in the safety argument and the trustworthiness of the associated items of evidence. Safety case arguments, often depicted using graphical notations such as GSN and CAE, are typically embedded and presented in one or more documents. One of these documents is the Safety Case Report. The periodic submission of a Safety Case Report is good practice and mandated in safety standards such as UK Defence Standard 00-56. The relationship between the safety argument structure and the embedding report can take different forms. The safety case argument may provide an executive summary at the beginning of the report, drive the flow of the report or be attached as an appendix to the report. In this paper, we address the relationship that exists between the safety case, safety argument depictions and the safety case report. We highlight the potential dangers of mismatch between these three entities, including the potential illusion of strong case created through the use of a structured graphical argumentation notation. We conclude that the safety case is the reasoning as to how the system is acceptably safe. The depicted safety case is a representation of the argument that is hoped to mirror the actual safety case. Finally, the safety case report can usefully provide an elaboration of the concepts referenced within the safety argument." @default.
- W179622534 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W179622534 creator A5017840476 @default.
- W179622534 creator A5048332271 @default.
- W179622534 date "2007-01-01" @default.
- W179622534 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W179622534 title "Safety case depictions vs. safety cases - would the real safety case please stand up?" @default.
- W179622534 cites W1973880086 @default.
- W179622534 cites W1994400001 @default.
- W179622534 cites W3149080678 @default.
- W179622534 doi "https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:20070472" @default.
- W179622534 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W179622534 type Work @default.
- W179622534 sameAs 179622534 @default.
- W179622534 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W179622534 countsByYear W1796225342014 @default.
- W179622534 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
- W179622534 hasAuthorship W179622534A5017840476 @default.
- W179622534 hasAuthorship W179622534A5048332271 @default.
- W179622534 hasBestOaLocation W1796225342 @default.
- W179622534 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W179622534 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
- W179622534 hasConcept C2780234205 @default.
- W179622534 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W179622534 hasConceptScore W179622534C127413603 @default.
- W179622534 hasConceptScore W179622534C200601418 @default.
- W179622534 hasConceptScore W179622534C2780234205 @default.
- W179622534 hasConceptScore W179622534C41008148 @default.
- W179622534 hasLocation W1796225341 @default.
- W179622534 hasLocation W1796225342 @default.
- W179622534 hasOpenAccess W179622534 @default.
- W179622534 hasPrimaryLocation W1796225341 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2093578348 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2121153 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2766271392 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W179622534 hasRelatedWork W612501711 @default.
- W179622534 isParatext "false" @default.
- W179622534 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W179622534 magId "179622534" @default.
- W179622534 workType "article" @default.