FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1802912108> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1802912108 endingPage "747" @default.
• W1802912108 startingPage "741" @default.
• W1802912108 abstract "Good examinations have a number of characteristics, including validity, reliable scores, educational impact, practicability and acceptability. Scores from the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) are more reliable than the single long case examination, but concerns about its validity have led to modifications and the development of other models, such as the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) and the objective structured long examination record (OSLER). These retain some of the characteristics of the long case, but feature repeated encounters and more structure. Nevertheless, the practical considerations and costs associated with mounting large-scale examinations remain significant. The lack of metrics handicaps progress. This paper reports a system whereby a sequential design concentrates limited resources where they are most needed in order to maintain the reliability of scores and practicability at the pass/fail interface.We analysed data pertaining to the final examination administered in 2009. In the complete final examination, candidates see eight real patients (the OSLER) and encounter 12 OSCE stations. Candidates whose performance is judged as entirely satisfactory after the first four patients and six OSCE stations are not examined further. The others - about a third of candidates - see the remaining patients and stations and are judged on the complete examination. Reliability was calculated from the scores of all candidates on the first part of the examination using generalisability theory and practicability in terms of financial resources. The functioning of the sequential system was assessed by the ability of the first part of the examination to predict the final result for the cohort.Generalisability for the OSLER was 0.63 after four patients and 0.77 after eight patients. The OSCE was less reliable (0.38 after six stations and 0.55 after 12). There was only a weak correlation between the OSLER and the OSCE. The first stage was highly predictive of the results of the second stage. Savings facilitated by the sequential design amounted to approximately GBP 30,000.The overall utility of examinations involves compromise. The system described provides good perceived validity with reasonably reliable scores; a sequential design can concentrate resources where they are most needed and still allow wide sampling of tasks." @default.
• W1802912108 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1802912108 creator A5010471327 @default.
• W1802912108 creator A5020143676 @default.
• W1802912108 creator A5027200015 @default.
• W1802912108 creator A5048277752 @default.
• W1802912108 creator A5088539556 @default.
• W1802912108 date "2011-06-07" @default.
• W1802912108 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1802912108 title "A final clinical examination using a sequential design to improve cost-effectiveness" @default.
• W1802912108 cites W1973975145 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W1975114734 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W1981185637 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2000698760 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2021378444 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2034178686 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2064298815 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2067365814 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2067951354 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2099635642 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2101577705 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2117990294 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2130848633 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2130910286 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2135009814 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2143537252 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2155982861 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2163175447 @default.
• W1802912108 cites W2170866716 @default.
• W1802912108 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03926.x" @default.
• W1802912108 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21649707" @default.
• W1802912108 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1802912108 type Work @default.
• W1802912108 sameAs 1802912108 @default.
• W1802912108 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082012 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082013 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082014 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082015 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082016 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082017 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082019 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082020 @default.
• W1802912108 countsByYear W18029121082022 @default.
• W1802912108 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1802912108 hasAuthorship W1802912108A5010471327 @default.
• W1802912108 hasAuthorship W1802912108A5020143676 @default.
• W1802912108 hasAuthorship W1802912108A5027200015 @default.
• W1802912108 hasAuthorship W1802912108A5048277752 @default.
• W1802912108 hasAuthorship W1802912108A5088539556 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C2778000598 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C2780541860 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C121332964 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C141071460 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C163258240 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C19527891 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C2778000598 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C2780541860 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C41008148 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C43214815 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C509550671 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C527108885 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C62520636 @default.
• W1802912108 hasConceptScore W1802912108C71924100 @default.
• W1802912108 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W1802912108 hasLocation W18029121081 @default.
• W1802912108 hasLocation W18029121082 @default.
• W1802912108 hasOpenAccess W1802912108 @default.
• W1802912108 hasPrimaryLocation W18029121081 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W1897895570 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W1986610724 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W1987230505 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W2092776764 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W2103745921 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W2160258436 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W2225082482 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W2389878003 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W2981861109 @default.
• W1802912108 hasRelatedWork W3199540664 @default.
• W1802912108 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W1802912108 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1802912108 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1802912108 magId "1802912108" @default.
• W1802912108 workType "article" @default.