FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1805107655> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1805107655 endingPage "29" @default.
• W1805107655 startingPage "25" @default.
• W1805107655 abstract "Joan Digby's passionate article about the role of rubrics in outcomes assessment well-timed and pertinent to contemporary issues in honors education. In her piece, Digby argues that outcomes assessment and the rubrics that often accompany it stifle imagination, creativity, and outside-the-box thinking that all honors educators hope to foster in our students. My goal, Digby writes, is not to score or measure students against preconceived expectations but to encourage the unexpected, the breakthrough response that utterly new, different, and thus exciting Digby's illustrations reveal her assumptions about assessment and rubrics today but the question whether her assumption-that assessment and rubrics necessarily stifle the imagination essential to honors education-stands up to scrutiny. One can debate the merits of rubrics, but to argue that they stifle imagination or creativity problematic As an educator, I have been drawn to rubrics at times and repelled at other times. After working with students at various levels for many years, I have come to learn the value of rubrics that are well-crafted. Poorly crafted rubrics are, as Digby says, nothing more than little boxes far less colorful and ingenious than Rubik's Cube, but well-crafted rubrics can be instrumental in helping students learn and helping teachers assess their learning. A well-crafted rubric difficult to create, and it might be easier to dismiss the entire notion of rubrics than to devote the time and effort necessary to create an effective one. However, honors education never about doing things the easier way. If we challenge our students to view notions of society and their disciplines from a different perspective than ones that are familiar to them, then we must challenge ourselves to do likewise An effective rubric should not place students or their work into boxes but should be a working, fluid, and negotiable document that allows students to pursue success in a variety of ways; it should state what students need to accomplish without being prescriptive in how they get to that point. Because a good rubric fluid, it can provide students with the power and flexibility to determine their own definitions and applications of abstract concepts. Let's take the example of a much-desired skill in honors programs: leadership. The leadership competency rubric for Minnesota State, Mankato Honors Program's electronic portfolio states that students need to personal theories and values of leadership within campus or community organizations by the time they graduate. The rubric does not tell them which organization(s) to participate in, which personal theories and values to use, how to use these chosen theories and values, or how to articulate their application of theory into practice within their electronic portfolio. Students can fill that box in a variety of ways. The rubric tells students what they need to do, but our students create it and give life to it As a result, the rubric allows them to negotiate their best way to achieve the end result The goal achievable in a variety of ways, but throughout the negotiation process honors faculty and staff advise students and provide feedback when needed or asked so that students know what required of them; it would be unfair to ask students to explore the concept of leadership and then just let them go out on their own, hoping they come back with something effective. Because of the standards-driven pressures on the K-12 system, students are often not asked to engage in activities as open-ended as in college, especially in an honors program or college. In an honors section of First-Year Experience or Introduction to Honors course, the instant confusion when students are asked to reflect almost palpable. Most first-year students, through no fault of their own, have no idea what that means. Reflection a nebulous concept that often results in students' submitting written work closer to description than reflection. …" @default.
• W1805107655 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1805107655 creator A5007084438 @default.
• W1805107655 date "2014-09-22" @default.
• W1805107655 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1805107655 title "On Assessment, Imagination, and Agency: Using Rubrics to Inform and Negotiate the Honors Experience" @default.
• W1805107655 cites W1569444432 @default.
• W1805107655 cites W27608418 @default.
• W1805107655 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1805107655 type Work @default.
• W1805107655 sameAs 1805107655 @default.
• W1805107655 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1805107655 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1805107655 hasAuthorship W1805107655A5007084438 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C11012388 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C111640148 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C53839665 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C108170787 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C11012388 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C111472728 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C111640148 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C136815107 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C138885662 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C144024400 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C145420912 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C15744967 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C17744445 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C19417346 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C199539241 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C2776050585 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C36289849 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C53839665 @default.
• W1805107655 hasConceptScore W1805107655C77805123 @default.
• W1805107655 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1805107655 hasLocation W18051076551 @default.
• W1805107655 hasOpenAccess W1805107655 @default.
• W1805107655 hasPrimaryLocation W18051076551 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W11018229 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W1145794295 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W124306290 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W1543016597 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W1591958304 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W1736222174 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W1747186476 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W207672659 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W2106528670 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W2152625539 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W2166830240 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W2898954695 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W300934497 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W318984483 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W340200196 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W350477238 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W572191142 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W836146076 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W186303790 @default.
• W1805107655 hasRelatedWork W2338229391 @default.
• W1805107655 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W1805107655 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1805107655 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1805107655 magId "1805107655" @default.
• W1805107655 workType "article" @default.