FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1809728561> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1809728561 abstract "There remains a concern that Indigenous Australians have been over-researched without corresponding improvements in their health; this trend is applicable to most Indigenous populations globally. This debate article has a dual purpose: 1) to open a frank conversation about the value of research to Indigenous Australian populations; and 2) to stimulate ways of thinking about potential resolutions to the lack of progress made in the Indigenous research benefit debate.Capturing the meaning of research benefit takes the form of ethical value-oriented methodological considerations in the decision-making processes of Indigenous research endeavours. Because research practices come from Western knowledge bases, attaining such positions in research means reconciling both Indigenous and Western knowledge systems to produce new methodologies that guide planning, evaluating and monitoring of research practices as necessary. Increasingly, more sophisticated performance measures have been implemented to ensure academic impact and benefits are captured. Assessing societal and other non-academic impacts and benefits however, has not been accorded corresponding attention. Research reform has only focussed on research translation in more recent years. The research impact debate must take account of the various standards of accountability (to whom), impact priorities (for whom), positive and negative impacts, and biases that operate in describing impact and measuring benefit.A perennial question in Indigenous research discourse is whether the abundance of research conducted; purportedly to improve health, is justified and benefits Indigenous people in ways that are meaningful and valued by them. Different research stakeholders have different conceptions of the value and nature of research, its conduct, what it should achieve and the kinds of benefits expected. We need to work collaboratively and listen more closely to the voice of Indigenous Australians to better understand, demonstrate and measure health research benefits. The authors conclude that as an imperative, a systematic benefit assessment strategy that includes identification of research priorities and planning, monitoring and evaluation components needs to be developed and implemented across research projects. In Indigenous health research, this will often mean adopting a benefit-led approach by changing the way research is done and preferencing alternative research methodologies. As a point of departure to improving impact and reaching mutually beneficial outcomes for researchers and partners in Indigenous health research, we need to routinise the assessment of benefit from outset of research as one of the standards toward which we work." @default.
• W1809728561 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5004174606 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5014095271 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5017063057 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5023010258 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5040465101 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5045541106 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5047004465 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5054485095 @default.
• W1809728561 creator A5090719717 @default.
• W1809728561 date "2015-07-23" @default.
• W1809728561 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1809728561 title "No one’s discussing the elephant in the room: contemplating questions of research impact and benefit in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian health research" @default.
• W1809728561 cites W1531031760 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W1965720378 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W1979116104 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W1980612928 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W1996993951 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2002854086 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2003498228 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2014027066 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2020682197 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2033337001 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2035417566 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2053246061 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2076166069 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2100493403 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2117755506 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2121921120 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2129650884 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2141003342 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2153258587 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2242409283 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2257821308 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2318536794 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2400914487 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2404651987 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2434320816 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2435962479 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W2481234040 @default.
• W1809728561 cites W1457690909 @default.
• W1809728561 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2052-3" @default.
• W1809728561 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4511988" @default.
• W1809728561 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26202429" @default.
• W1809728561 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1809728561 type Work @default.
• W1809728561 sameAs 1809728561 @default.
• W1809728561 citedByCount "158" @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612014 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612016 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612017 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612018 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612019 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612020 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612021 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612022 @default.
• W1809728561 countsByYear W18097285612023 @default.
• W1809728561 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5004174606 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5014095271 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5017063057 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5023010258 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5040465101 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5045541106 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5047004465 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5054485095 @default.
• W1809728561 hasAuthorship W1809728561A5090719717 @default.
• W1809728561 hasBestOaLocation W18097285611 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C55958113 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConcept C95124753 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C119857082 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C138885662 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C144024400 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C17744445 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C18903297 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C199539241 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C2776007630 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C2776291640 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C2777200299 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C39549134 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C41008148 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C46312422 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C55958113 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C71924100 @default.
• W1809728561 hasConceptScore W1809728561C86803240 @default.

• next