FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W181558553> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W181558553 endingPage "1259" @default.
• W181558553 startingPage "1252" @default.
• W181558553 abstract "The outcome of total knee replacement after high tibial osteotomy remains uncertain. We hypothesized that the results of total knee replacement with or without a previous high tibial osteotomy are similar.The results of a consecutive series of thirty-nine bilateral total knee arthroplasties performed with cement at an average of 8.7 years after unilateral high tibial osteotomy were reviewed. There were twenty-seven men and twelve women. Preoperatively, the knee scores according to the system of the Knee Society were similar for all of the knees; however, valgus alignment and patella infera were more common in the knees with a previous high tibial osteotomy. Bilateral total knee replacement was staged in seven patients and was simultaneous in thirty-two patients. The results of the total knee arthroplasties were retrospectively reviewed with respect to the knee and function scores according to the system of the Knee Society, the radiographic findings, and the complications.Intraoperatively, no notable differences were identified in the number of medial, lateral, or lateral patellar releases required. However, less lateral tibial bone was resected in the group with a previous high tibial osteotomy (average, 3.3 millimeters) than in the group without a high tibial osteotomy (average, 7.5 millimeters). The average duration of follow-up was 7.5 years (range, three to sixteen years) in the group with a previous high tibial osteotomy and 6.8 years (range, two to ten years) in the group without a high tibial osteotomy. At the time of the final follow-up, the knee and function scores were similar for the two groups (89.0 and 81.0 points, respectively, for the group with a previous high tibial osteotomy, and 89.6 and 83.9 points, respectively, for the group without a high tibial osteotomy). Although more knees were free of pain in the group without a previous high tibial osteotomy (thirty-six) than in the group with a previous osteotomy (thirty-three), this difference was not found to be significant with the numbers available (p = 0.4810). Knee alignment and stability, femoral and tibial component alignment, and range of motion also were similar in both groups postoperatively. One allpolyethylene tibial component was revised in the high tibial osteotomy group. Two knees in each group required manipulation. There were no deep infections.While patients with a previous high tibial osteotomy may have important differences preoperatively, including valgus alignment, patella infera, and decreased bone stock in the proximal part of the tibia, the present study suggests that the clinical and radiographic results of primary total knee arthroplasty in knees with and without a previous high tibial osteotomy are not substantially different. In our relatively small group of patients, the previous high tibial osteotomy had no adverse effect on the outcome of the subsequent total knee replacement." @default.
• W181558553 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W181558553 creator A5011021773 @default.
• W181558553 creator A5022723083 @default.
• W181558553 creator A5040397448 @default.
• W181558553 creator A5049805689 @default.
• W181558553 date "2000-09-01" @default.
• W181558553 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W181558553 title "Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy" @default.
• W181558553 cites W1850685718 @default.
• W181558553 cites W1856587189 @default.
• W181558553 cites W1968192622 @default.
• W181558553 cites W1971680736 @default.
• W181558553 cites W1976137021 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2000924045 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2053829949 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2081222089 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2101554647 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2111088881 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2115927489 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2146455275 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2183407890 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2273761274 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2292223719 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2408851379 @default.
• W181558553 cites W2412156282 @default.
• W181558553 cites W4293240806 @default.
• W181558553 cites W4296478333 @default.
• W181558553 cites W4298249585 @default.
• W181558553 cites W58828629 @default.
• W181558553 cites W73111644 @default.
• W181558553 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200009000-00005" @default.
• W181558553 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11005516" @default.
• W181558553 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W181558553 type Work @default.
• W181558553 sameAs 181558553 @default.
• W181558553 citedByCount "116" @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532012 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532013 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532014 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532015 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532016 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532017 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532018 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532019 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532020 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532021 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532022 @default.
• W181558553 countsByYear W1815585532023 @default.
• W181558553 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W181558553 hasAuthorship W181558553A5011021773 @default.
• W181558553 hasAuthorship W181558553A5022723083 @default.
• W181558553 hasAuthorship W181558553A5040397448 @default.
• W181558553 hasAuthorship W181558553A5049805689 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2779866876 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2780368125 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C2908736133 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C3017871827 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W181558553 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C141071460 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C142724271 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C204787440 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2776164576 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2776389721 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2777236700 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2778336525 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2779866876 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2780368125 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2781017183 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C2908736133 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C29694066 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C3017871827 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C36454342 @default.
• W181558553 hasConceptScore W181558553C71924100 @default.
• W181558553 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W181558553 hasLocation W1815585531 @default.
• W181558553 hasLocation W1815585532 @default.
• W181558553 hasOpenAccess W181558553 @default.
• W181558553 hasPrimaryLocation W1815585531 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W1987527235 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2085731363 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2314807255 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2336939334 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2368905774 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2411584438 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2527688872 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2568257959 @default.
• W181558553 hasRelatedWork W2995794603 @default.

• next