FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1815657552> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1815657552 abstract "Background: Primary care at home is not a new idea, but rather a reinvention of an old and almost forgotten practice. Today, only 1% of primary care visits are provided in a home setting; despite the increasing aging homebound population in the United States. Current primary care at home research relates improved patient outcomes with primary care at home visits. Primary care at home is reemerging in the United States, but currently is not generating many positive reviews. There is a gap in the current primary care at home literature regarding nurse practitioner home visit practices and perceptions. Methods: A quantitative quasi-experimental study design was utilized for this study. The underlying researcher hypothesis was that primary care home visits are underutilized. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions, barriers, knowledge and practices of nurse practitioners (NPs) regarding home visits in primary care and to evaluate changes in perceptions and practices following an educational intervention. The sample chosen for this study was volunteer nurse practitioners attending two pharmacology update conferences. Ninety eight nurse practitioners were included in this convenience sample study. The data collection of this study occurred in three phases. The first and second phases of the study used a face to face approach. The third phase occurred approximately six weeks later via email. The analysis methods were cross tabulations and descriptive statistics. Results: The nurse practitioner participants in this study indicated that 27% had made a primary care home visit, thus supporting the hypothesis for this study. Fifty four percent indicated that they had not considered making a primary care at home visit. Forty three percent stated that they would be more likely to make or increase a home visit based on the educational intervention. Eighty five percent of initial study participants were aware that Medicare could be billed for PRIMARY CARE AT HOME 7 primary care home visit. Six percent of the Home Visit Implementation Post Survey participants indicated making primary care home visits since September 2013. Conclusions: The primary conclusion of this study was that primary care home visits are underutilized by nurse practitioner study participants. The findings from this study will add to the body of knowledge regarding nurses’ perceptions and practices of primary care at home. The researcher believes that by increasing awareness of benefits of primary care home visits; nurse practitioners will increase the amount of home visits being made. Ultimately, increasing access of primary care to homebound patients will improve their overall patient outcomes." @default.
• W1815657552 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1815657552 creator A5048974029 @default.
• W1815657552 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W1815657552 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1815657552 title "Primary Care at Home: Nurse Practitioners' Perceptions and Practices" @default.
• W1815657552 cites W1494873996 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W1504724278 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W1583813178 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W1589149 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W1590276839 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2005368648 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2022738588 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2028693831 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2054085905 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2065590402 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2105922258 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2108776059 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2113246429 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2122617028 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2129303710 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2144407851 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2227058536 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2314120083 @default.
• W1815657552 cites W2320504852 @default.
• W1815657552 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1815657552 type Work @default.
• W1815657552 sameAs 1815657552 @default.
• W1815657552 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1815657552 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1815657552 hasAuthorship W1815657552A5048974029 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C2984752397 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C105795698 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C15744967 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C159110408 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C169760540 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C26760741 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C2780665704 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C2908647359 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C2984752397 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C33923547 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C39896193 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C512399662 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C71924100 @default.
• W1815657552 hasConceptScore W1815657552C99454951 @default.
• W1815657552 hasLocation W18156575521 @default.
• W1815657552 hasOpenAccess W1815657552 @default.
• W1815657552 hasPrimaryLocation W18156575521 @default.
• W1815657552 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1815657552 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1815657552 magId "1815657552" @default.
• W1815657552 workType "article" @default.