FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W18172070> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W18172070 endingPage "32" @default.
• W18172070 startingPage "27" @default.
• W18172070 abstract "E-Commerce is deploying computer and communications technologies to support an organization's sales process (Capozzoli, True, & Pritchett, 2000). It can be dichotomized as Business to Consumer (B2C) and Business to Business (B2B), is increasing at a rapid rate, and is expected to continue although estimates vary substantially. For example, Marketer.com (2001) estimates that B2C activity will grow from $60 billion in 2000 to $428 billion in 2005, and Goldman Sachs (Marketer.com, 2001) is estimating $2.1 trillion for the same period. In 2000, worldwide B2B Internet commerce surpassed $433 billion. That total is projected to reach $919 billion in 2001 and $8.5 trillion by 2005 (Gartner Corporation, 2001). The requirement of systems integration is being driven by this growth. The success of E-Commerce activity is directly affected by system integration efforts associated with traditional back office and web-based systems. The potential benefits of enterprise-wide E-Commerce activities (e.g., customer relationship, inventory, and process management) to an organization emphasize the need for system integration beyond individual sales transactions. Indeed, the range of business processes that represent a more complex and dynamic business arrangement in which advancing technologies should be effectively integrated into the planning process is broad. Unfortunately, many organizations are not capitalizing on the synergistic advantages of integrated systems (Maruca, 1999). Fewer than one-third of Internet retailers have integrated their back office inventory databases with their front-end web systems (Spieler, 2001). Despite the apparent lack of integration, some organizations are attempting to coordinate such customer activities. Wal-Mart has established a goods returns policy that allows a customer the option to return merchandise purchased on-line to any WalMart store (Wal-Mart, 2001). Planning for and integrating ECommerce technologies are essential to an organization's survival. The success of a strategy depends on doing many things well and integrating those activities (Porter, 1996). According to Mintzberg (1994), an organization must do three things better than the competition: it must know itself, have robust business systems, and have both an internal and external focus. Following these guidelines is made more difficult by a rapidly changing and advancing technological environment. E-Commerce capabilities have enabled both buyers and sellers of products to obtain more and better information faster. This shifting of the channel power structure is creating chaos in traditional business processes and in the development and maintenance of internal (e.g., employee) and external (e.g., customer and supplier) relationships. The goals of these systems are to improve financial performance and to create and sustain competitive advantages. Thus, organizations need to better understand the system as a whole. One means of accomplishing this is via planned periodic reviews of ECommerce activities as they relate to existing business processes and systems. Capozzoli, True, and Pritchett (2000) set forth an initial framework for describing the relationship between E-Commerce activity and systems integration that is categorized in five levels. A Level-1 company makes little or no use of computers and/or communications technology, and a Level-5 firm makes extensive, cutting-edge use of these tools (see Figure 1). The purpose of this paper is to further develop this framework for positioning organizational business processes and technological capabilities consistent with Mintzberg's and Porter's guidelines. Framework Discussion E-Commerce activities, both B2C and 13213, can address different requirements and must be identified, managed, and measured as such. Understanding these distinctions is crucial because they can influence system integration requirements, but current measurement indicators are incomplete and may give erroneous and unreliable output. …" @default.
• W18172070 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W18172070 creator A5043841694 @default.
• W18172070 creator A5075827232 @default.
• W18172070 date "2001-04-01" @default.
• W18172070 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W18172070 title "An e-Commerce Systems Integration Framework" @default.
• W18172070 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W18172070 type Work @default.
• W18172070 sameAs 18172070 @default.
• W18172070 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W18172070 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W18172070 hasAuthorship W18172070A5043841694 @default.
• W18172070 hasAuthorship W18172070A5075827232 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C137308460 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C174998907 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C19527686 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C2778348171 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C4216890 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C78597825 @default.
• W18172070 hasConcept C85345410 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C10138342 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C110875604 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C136764020 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C137308460 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C144133560 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C162853370 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C174998907 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C19527686 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C2778348171 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C41008148 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C4216890 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C77088390 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C78597825 @default.
• W18172070 hasConceptScore W18172070C85345410 @default.
• W18172070 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W18172070 hasLocation W181720701 @default.
• W18172070 hasOpenAccess W18172070 @default.
• W18172070 hasPrimaryLocation W181720701 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W1864831731 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W1904677703 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W1939063567 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W1981040264 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2051062761 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2136928580 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2161232551 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2165109582 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2249287715 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2254204552 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2334398794 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2591280302 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2787963390 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2994382765 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W3112894576 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W3177146362 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W3180117515 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W352784981 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W577019507 @default.
• W18172070 hasRelatedWork W2463188621 @default.
• W18172070 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W18172070 isParatext "false" @default.
• W18172070 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W18172070 magId "18172070" @default.
• W18172070 workType "article" @default.