FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1822538352> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1822538352 abstract "Emerging environmental problems and technologies, coupled with the existence of mature regulatory regimes governing most industrial sources of pollution, combine to reveal with new clarity the harms that individual behaviors and lifestyles inflict on the environment. However, changing how individuals impact the environment through their daily behaviors requires a reorientation of environmental law and policy and a balancing of government prerogatives and individual liberty. A growing body of legal scholarship recognizes the environmental significance of individual behaviors and lifestyles, critiques the failure of environmental law and policy to capture harms traceable to individuals, and suggests and evaluates strategies for capturing individual harms going forward. In this discussion, mandates on individuals have been largely dismissed or deemphasized as a potential policy tool for changing environmentally significant individual behaviors because of a widely shared view that (1) detection and enforcement of such mandates pose insurmountable technical, administrative, and cost barriers and (2) that their application to individuals would trigger insurmountable intrusion objections. There are, however, reasons to believe, as to the first noted objection to the use of mandates, that the cost and feasibility of imposing mandates on environmentally significant individual behaviors may be less daunting than widely anticipated. With respect to the second objection (the intrusion objection, or the idea that mandates on individually significant environmental behaviors would so offend notions of individual liberty and privacy that they cannot be adopted or enforced), that objection to the use of mandates has yet to be subjected to critical examination to determine its source, scope, intransigence, or otherwise evaluate with particularity the obstacle that it (may) pose. Better understanding of whether, when and/or why mandates on environmentally significant behavior may trigger objections on the ground that they are “intrusive” would help to assess mandates as a policy tool for changing environmentally significant individual behaviors and could also provide guidance about how mandates could be structured to avoid such objections. This Article undertakes an initial effort to better define and understand the intrusion objection to the use of mandates to change environmentally significant individual behaviors. Part I surveys prior and existing laws aimed at or impacting individual behavior and/or associated environmental harms to develop a rough sense of when such regulations have (and have not) triggered what could be characterized as intrusion objections. Part II then looks to substantive due process jurisprudence for further guidance about when and why government restrictions on individual freedom give rise to intrusion objections. Part III builds on Parts I and II to suggest some principles to guide the consideration and development of mandates on environmentally significant individual behaviors going forward and proposes an energy waste ordinance that is both technically and administrative feasible and designed to avoid intrusion objections." @default.
• W1822538352 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1822538352 creator A5007391078 @default.
• W1822538352 date "2010-07-12" @default.
• W1822538352 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1822538352 title "When Government Intrudes: Regulating Individual Behaviors that Harm the Environment" @default.
• W1822538352 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1822538352 type Work @default.
• W1822538352 sameAs 1822538352 @default.
• W1822538352 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1822538352 countsByYear W18225383522013 @default.
• W1822538352 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1822538352 hasAuthorship W1822538352A5007391078 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C128069549 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C2777146004 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C100001284 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C128069549 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C138885662 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C144133560 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C162324750 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C17744445 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C185592680 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C190253527 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C199360897 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C199539241 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C2777146004 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C2777363581 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C2778012447 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C2778061430 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C2778137410 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C2779777834 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C41008148 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C41895202 @default.
• W1822538352 hasConceptScore W1822538352C55493867 @default.
• W1822538352 hasLocation W18225383521 @default.
• W1822538352 hasOpenAccess W1822538352 @default.
• W1822538352 hasPrimaryLocation W18225383521 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W1603067491 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W1847436094 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W1871470312 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2132431890 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2134961219 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2343866995 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2380429854 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2726247811 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2759929178 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2767950614 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W2803541266 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3035639847 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W30375698 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3085316889 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3121789703 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3123854859 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3124138553 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3124535185 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3124760790 @default.
• W1822538352 hasRelatedWork W3208559734 @default.
• W1822538352 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1822538352 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1822538352 magId "1822538352" @default.
• W1822538352 workType "article" @default.