FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1822934997> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1822934997 endingPage "12" @default.
• W1822934997 startingPage "12" @default.
• W1822934997 abstract "s / Journal of Nutrition & Intermediary Metabolism 1 (2014) 1e55 12 (in Iran); and issues for different stages of life. Participants also noted obstacles in teaching food knowledge in engaging ways and identified practical strategies to improve students’ knowledge. Conclusions: These findings provide policy makers and curriculum developers with a framework against which to assess education curricula and practical learning and teaching strategies to optimise students’ knowledge of nutrition and food systems. These data will be compared with similar data from Australia. Funding source(s): N/A. DELIVERING A VERY EARLY NUTRITION INTERVENTION FOR CANCER PATIENTS AT HOME USING TECHNOLOGY: A PILOT RANDOMISED TRIAL M.A. Silvers , J. Savva , C. Huggins , A. Kwok , T. Haines , H. Truby . Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash Health, VIC, Australia; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Australia; Allied Health Research Unit, Monash Health, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Australia E-mail: kate.huggins@monash.edu (C. Huggins) Background/Aims: This study aimed to effectively deliver a tailored very early nutrition intervention to newly diagnosed upper gastrointestinal cancer patients whilst in their own homes compared with standard nutrition care (SNC), i.e. inpatient referral. Methods: Patients were randomised to home nutrition intervention (HNI) or SNC. HNI commenced at diagnosis and continued weekly for 18 weeks. Data were collected at baseline, and at the week 26 follow-up. The primary outcome was Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 tool. Nutritional status was evaluated using the Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment. Patient perception of nutrition counselling was assessed by questionnaire. Data were analysed using linear mixed model analyses. Results: At baseline the prevalence of malnutrition was similar between groups (90%). Compared with SNC (n 1⁄4 11), the HNI (n 1⁄4 10) group had a significantly higher EORTC global QoL score (28.4, 95%CI 21.3, 35.4, adjusted for baseline, p < 0.001). Six deaths occurred during the study, five in SNC and one in HNI group (p 1⁄4 0.06). Nutritional risk score was lower (p < 0.001) and loss of body weight attenuated (p < 0.001) in the HNI group comparedwith SNC. The perceptions about nutrition counselling delivered via phone vs. SNC were not different. Conclusions: Delivery via telephone of a very early and intensive nutrition intervention, to newly diagnosed upper gastrointestinal cancer patients improved QoL and nutritional markers. This intervention is now being tested using an e-platform to further expand the delivery options of nutrition care to cancer patients in their home. Funding source(s): Southern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Services; Nutricia Research Foundation. IMPACT OF A NUTRITION PROMOTION SCHEME ON THE DIETARY INTAKE OF TWO-TO-FOUR YEAR OLDS ATTENDING LONG DAY CARE L. Bell , G. Hendrie , J. Hartley , R. Golley . 1 Sansom Institute for Health Research, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Adelaide, SA, Australia; 3 Start Right Eat Right, Southern Primary Health, SA, Australia E-mail: rebecca.golley@unisa.edu.au (R. Golley) Background/Aims: Nutrition promotion schemes such as Start Right Eat Right (SRER) commonly work in partnership with long day care centres (LDCC) to ensure that menus provide 50% age-appropriate nutrient reference values (NRVs). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SRER on the dietary intakes of children aged 2-4 years while in care. Methods: Twenty South Australian LDCC participated in SRER and dietary intake (morning/afternoon tea, lunch) of children's aged 2-4 years (n1⁄4 236 baseline, n 1⁄4 232 follow up) was assessed preand post-SRER implementation using the plate wastage method. Intervention fidelity was assessed. Pre/post comparisons were made using t-tests. Results: At follow up, 80% of centres were fully compliant with the SRER award criteria. Intake increased for all core food groups (range 0.2e0.4 servings, p < 0.001) except for vegetables, 0.4 (95%CI: 0.0, 0.9) servings at baseline vs. 0.5 (0.0, 1.0) servings at follow up, p 1⁄4 0.083. Energy intake increased (1629.7 ± 742.7 kJ vs. 1790.6 ± 820.4 kJ, p1⁄4 0.032), but remained below 50% of the NRV for 2-4 year olds. Macronutrient provision and consumption met the NRV benchmark, except saturated fat. Nutrient provision and consumptionmet the benchmark, except sodium, potassium and fibre. Food waste (difference between servings provided versus consumed) ranged from 0.1 for dairy foods to 0.3 for grains, vegetables and fruit. The degree of waste was consistent between time points. Conclusions: The benchmark recommended for LDCCmenusmaywarrant revision to 40% of NRVs. In addition to policy and menu strategies, additional nutrition promotion strategies may enhance children’s dietary intake and minimise food waste. Funding source(s): SA Health, UniSA. MOTIVATORS, BARRIERS AND BENEFITS OF FAMILY MEALS WITH YOUNG CHILDREN IN AUSTRALIA A.C. Spence , K.J. Campbell . Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Australia E-mail: a.spence@deakin.edu.au (A.C. Spence) Background/Aims: Family meals are likely to be an important setting for nutrition promotion, but little is known about young children’s family meals. This study’s aimwas to investigate motivators, barriers and benefits of family meals with children aged six months to six years. Methods: Parents of Australian children were invited through websites and blogs to complete an online survey. Ordered logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Preliminary data from 464 parents showed 92% viewed familymeals as important, with most agreeing they are a time to promote healthy child eating (91%) and social behaviours (95%), and to connect and talk (90%). Respondents generally enjoyed family meals (95%), though 33% reported they were sometimes a setting for disagreements, and 38% reported difficulty finding time to eat together, with working hours being a common challenge. Topics of most interest to parents were ways to: make eating together easier (37% very interested), make preparing meals easier (37%), grow food at home (38%) and recipes (61%). Frequency of family meals was not associated with child fruit or vegetable intakes, however, frequency of parent and child eating thesamefoodsatdinnerwasassociatedwithchildvegetable intake (p1⁄4 0.04). Conclusions: Frequency of familymeals is motivated by both nutrition and social factors, but parents face a number of challenges and would like information to address these. Parents and children eating the same foods at mealtimes is likely to be an important influence on child nutrition and a relevant topic for nutrition promotion. Funding source(s): N/A. NUTRITIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF AUSTRALIAN GENERAL PRACTICE REGISTRARS: RESULTS OF AN ON-LINE QUESTIONNAIRE S.L. O'Connell , C.A. Nowson . Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Australia E-mail: stella.oconnell@deakin.edu.au (S.L. O'Connell) Background/Aims: Nutrition education in entry-level medical courses in Australia is minimal. We aimed to assess nutritional knowledge and selfperceived nutrition competency in registrar members of General Practice Registrars Australia (GPRA), i.e. trainee doctors soon to be working independently as general practitioners (GPs) within the community. Methods: GPRA invited registrars by e-mail to participate in an anonymous on-line survey taking approximately 8 min to complete. Hampers worth $100 were awarded to the 1st, 50th, 100th, 150th and 200th respondents. Results: While 147 trainees took part, only 89 [20 males (22.5%) and 69 females (77.5%)] completed all questions. Most were aged up to 30 years (48.3%), with 42.7% aged 31 e 40 years. Half (50.6%) were in their first two years; 49.4% had completed 75% ormore of the GP training. Given a patient with high cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, a body mass index of 28 kg/m2 and seated blood pressure of 128/85 mmHg, most trainees chose weight loss (84%), reduction of saturated fats (90%), a maximum of two alcoholic drinks/day (82%), and increasing vegetable intake (83%) as ‘highly appropriate’ strategies. Only 51% put salt reduction in this category; 10% felt this was ‘not appropriate’. Two-thirds of trainees (66.0%) were ‘moderately" @default.
• W1822934997 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1822934997 creator A5009234848 @default.
• W1822934997 creator A5014215994 @default.
• W1822934997 creator A5019873592 @default.
• W1822934997 creator A5021147500 @default.
• W1822934997 creator A5078405126 @default.
• W1822934997 creator A5086165049 @default.
• W1822934997 date "2014-12-01" @default.
• W1822934997 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1822934997 title "Delivering a very early nutrition intervention for cancer patients at home using technology: A pilot randomised trial" @default.
• W1822934997 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnim.2014.10.032" @default.
• W1822934997 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1822934997 type Work @default.
• W1822934997 sameAs 1822934997 @default.
• W1822934997 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1822934997 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1822934997 hasAuthorship W1822934997A5009234848 @default.
• W1822934997 hasAuthorship W1822934997A5014215994 @default.
• W1822934997 hasAuthorship W1822934997A5019873592 @default.
• W1822934997 hasAuthorship W1822934997A5021147500 @default.
• W1822934997 hasAuthorship W1822934997A5078405126 @default.
• W1822934997 hasAuthorship W1822934997A5086165049 @default.
• W1822934997 hasBestOaLocation W18229349971 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C2994577977 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C121608353 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C126322002 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C159110408 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C168563851 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C1862650 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C2780665704 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C2994577977 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C71924100 @default.
• W1822934997 hasConceptScore W1822934997C99454951 @default.
• W1822934997 hasLocation W18229349971 @default.
• W1822934997 hasLocation W18229349972 @default.
• W1822934997 hasOpenAccess W1822934997 @default.
• W1822934997 hasPrimaryLocation W18229349971 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W1918442762 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W2000891412 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W2138217584 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W2467390466 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W2886701525 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W2943467658 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W3037467386 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W3038282643 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W4256514411 @default.
• W1822934997 hasRelatedWork W4324142409 @default.
• W1822934997 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W1822934997 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1822934997 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1822934997 magId "1822934997" @default.
• W1822934997 workType "article" @default.