FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1838828927> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1838828927 abstract "The first aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between clinical and physical-technical image quality applied to different strengths of iterative reconstruction in chest CT images using Thiel cadaver acquisitions and Catphan images. The second aim was to determine the potential dose reduction of iterative reconstruction compared to conventional filtered back projection based on different clinical and physical-technical image quality parameters. Clinical image quality was assessed using three Thiel embalmed human cadavers. A Catphan phantom was used to assess physical-technical image quality parameters such as noise, contrast-detail and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Both Catphan and chest Thiel CT images were acquired on a multislice CT scanner at 120 kVp and 0.9 pitch. Six different refmAs settings were applied (12, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150refmAs) and each scan was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) algorithms (1,3 and 5 strengths) using a sharp kernel, resulting in 24 image series. Four radiologists assessed the clinical image quality, using a visual grading analysis (VGA) technique based on the European Quality Criteria for Chest CT. Correlation coefficients between clinical and physical-technical image quality varied from 0.88 to 0.92, depending on the selected physical-technical parameter. Depending on the strength of SAFIRE, the potential dose reduction based on noise, CNR and the inverse image quality figure (IQFinv) varied from 14.0 to 67.8 %, 16.0 to 71.5 % and 22.7 to 50.6 % respectively. Potential dose reduction based on clinical image quality varied from 27 to 37.4 %, depending on the strength of SAFIRE. Our results demonstrate that noise assessments in a uniform phantom overestimate the potential dose reduction for the SAFIRE IR algorithm. Since the IQFinv based dose reduction is quite consistent with the clinical based dose reduction, an optimised contrast-detail phantom could improve the use of contrast-detail analysis for image quality assessment in chest CT imaging. In conclusion, one should be cautious to evaluate the performance of CT equipment taking into account only physical-technical parameters as noise and CNR, as this might give an incomplete representation of the actual clinical image quality performance." @default.
• W1838828927 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5000485213 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5010523096 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5011994025 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5013065873 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5016445456 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5051281756 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5053938576 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5055386841 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5060358338 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5074363568 @default.
• W1838828927 creator A5076846604 @default.
• W1838828927 date "2015-08-19" @default.
• W1838828927 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1838828927 title "Correlation of clinical and physical-technical image quality in chest CT: a human cadaver study applied on iterative reconstruction" @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1504670912 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1923080384 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1964562216 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1977341432 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1978709834 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1985001625 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1990654820 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W1991365773 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2000932950 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2001435563 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2017827138 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2027162949 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2028384428 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2036281165 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2046562889 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2067829201 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2070805377 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2078661560 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2088216094 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2089344753 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2091679518 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2095543231 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2095718637 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2102097235 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2124822017 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2129873188 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2137619600 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2159358321 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2169645005 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2171697262 @default.
• W1838828927 cites W2413335608 @default.
• W1838828927 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-015-0075-y" @default.
• W1838828927 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4541737" @default.
• W1838828927 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26286596" @default.
• W1838828927 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1838828927 type Work @default.
• W1838828927 sameAs 1838828927 @default.
• W1838828927 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W1838828927 countsByYear W18388289272017 @default.
• W1838828927 countsByYear W18388289272018 @default.
• W1838828927 countsByYear W18388289272019 @default.
• W1838828927 countsByYear W18388289272020 @default.
• W1838828927 countsByYear W18388289272021 @default.
• W1838828927 countsByYear W18388289272022 @default.
• W1838828927 countsByYear W18388289272023 @default.
• W1838828927 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5000485213 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5010523096 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5011994025 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5013065873 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5016445456 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5051281756 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5053938576 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5055386841 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5060358338 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5074363568 @default.
• W1838828927 hasAuthorship W1838828927A5076846604 @default.
• W1838828927 hasBestOaLocation W18388289271 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C141379421 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C187954543 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C35772409 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C104293457 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C115961682 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C126838900 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C141379421 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C154945302 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C187954543 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C2989005 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C35772409 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C41008148 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C544519230 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C55020928 @default.
• W1838828927 hasConceptScore W1838828927C71924100 @default.
• W1838828927 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1838828927 hasLocation W18388289271 @default.

• next