FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1840892723> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1840892723 endingPage "17" @default.
• W1840892723 startingPage "11" @default.
• W1840892723 abstract "Objectives: The issue of low back pain (LBP) is as common as it is perplexing. LBP is thought to be a chronic issue in approximately 10% of the U.S. population. This condition has wide-reaching social and economical reverberations. Despite the availability of modern diagnostic tools, the cause of the pain generator is often unidentifiable. The authors were asked to create an overview of the etiology of LBP for physicians who implant neurostimulation devices for the treatment of chronic pain patients. Some prevalence data, based on the current available literature, have been provided for the more common structural conditions causing LBP. However, a comprehensive review of prevalence of various conditions and their respective manifestations as LBP is beyond the scope of this article. Materials and Methods: A review was performed of frequently cited articles with search terms for “low back pain” using PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. The authors also reviewed other literature from commonly utilized sources in the field of interventional pain medicine such as the journals of Neuromodulation, Pain Medicine, Spine, and Neurosurgery in the publication date range of 1975 to the present. Moreover, recent edition textbooks of other specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology, neurology, internal medicine, and surgery were referenced to develop a comprehensive list of the differential diagnoses. In order to capture the broad scope of information presented in this article, the criteria used to choose the references included published peer-reviewed articles that provided information on LBP as a symptom of a case report to common presentations of various conditions as described in a number of current, and commonly used, textbooks in their specialty. Results: The article serves as a reference for commonly cited causes of LBP as well as less common conditions presenting with LBP as a possible symptom, which may occur as a solitary pain generator or in combination with other etiologies. The information is structured in such a fashion to allow a comprehensive overview for every reader, including the most experienced implanting physicians. The article is designed to kindle critical thinking regarding the massive scope involved in the assessment of a patient with a complaint of LBP. The results of the comprehensive research to produce this article clearly indicate the broad scope of this list of differential diagnoses. The reader should be aware that the lists are by no means all-inclusive. Perhaps additional efforts will be necessary to build on the available information in this article in the future. Furthermore, although some prevalence data for LBP, as it is related to structural spine, is readily available based on the excellent work of our colleagues and presented throughout this paper, for other disease processes, the prevalence data are scarce to nonexistent. This underscores the need for further research to better understand this elusive condition. The size and breadth of the topic at hand in this article would arguably deserve its own comprehensive textbook. The complexity and discussion points of each identified pain generator could be given a chapter or section to reflect complex learning deserved by each topic. With these limitations, the authors recommend the reader to evaluate this article in the context of a broader topic of LBP and neurostimulation. Conclusions: LBP is an extremely common condition associated, as a symptom, with various disease processes, regardless of their relationship with the lumbar spine or its innervation. This article underscores the broad nature of LBP as a symptom of many diagnoses. The primary conclusion reached by the authors is the most important recommendation by all mentors in medicine, which is to obtain a comprehensive history and perform a complete physical examination on each patient. Despite the fact that there is an emerging school of thought questioning the validity of the physical examination, this tool continues to be the current standard of care and used by a majority of clinicians around the world. The physician must analyze the information obtained from his/her history, physical examination, and diagnostic tools with the recognition of the broad nature of the differential diagnoses of LBP in order to be able to best treat the patient. The issue of low back pain (LBP) is as common as it is perplexing. LBP is thought to be a chronic issue in approximately 10% of the U.S. population. This condition has wide-reaching social and economical reverberations. Despite the availability of modern diagnostic tools, the cause of the pain generator is often unidentifiable. The authors were asked to create an overview of the etiology of LBP for physicians who implant neurostimulation devices for the treatment of chronic pain patients. Some prevalence data, based on the current available literature, have been provided for the more common structural conditions causing LBP. However, a comprehensive review of prevalence of various conditions and their respective manifestations as LBP is beyond the scope of this article. A review was performed of frequently cited articles with search terms for “low back pain” using PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. The authors also reviewed other literature from commonly utilized sources in the field of interventional pain medicine such as the journals of Neuromodulation, Pain Medicine, Spine, and Neurosurgery in the publication date range of 1975 to the present. Moreover, recent edition textbooks of other specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology, neurology, internal medicine, and surgery were referenced to develop a comprehensive list of the differential diagnoses. In order to capture the broad scope of information presented in this article, the criteria used to choose the references included published peer-reviewed articles that provided information on LBP as a symptom of a case report to common presentations of various conditions as described in a number of current, and commonly used, textbooks in their specialty. The article serves as a reference for commonly cited causes of LBP as well as less common conditions presenting with LBP as a possible symptom, which may occur as a solitary pain generator or in combination with other etiologies. The information is structured in such a fashion to allow a comprehensive overview for every reader, including the most experienced implanting physicians. The article is designed to kindle critical thinking regarding the massive scope involved in the assessment of a patient with a complaint of LBP. The results of the comprehensive research to produce this article clearly indicate the broad scope of this list of differential diagnoses. The reader should be aware that the lists are by no means all-inclusive. Perhaps additional efforts will be necessary to build on the available information in this article in the future. Furthermore, although some prevalence data for LBP, as it is related to structural spine, is readily available based on the excellent work of our colleagues and presented throughout this paper, for other disease processes, the prevalence data are scarce to nonexistent. This underscores the need for further research to better understand this elusive condition. The size and breadth of the topic at hand in this article would arguably deserve its own comprehensive textbook. The complexity and discussion points of each identified pain generator could be given a chapter or section to reflect complex learning deserved by each topic. With these limitations, the authors recommend the reader to evaluate this article in the context of a broader topic of LBP and neurostimulation. LBP is an extremely common condition associated, as a symptom, with various disease processes, regardless of their relationship with the lumbar spine or its innervation. This article underscores the broad nature of LBP as a symptom of many diagnoses. The primary conclusion reached by the authors is the most important recommendation by all mentors in medicine, which is to obtain a comprehensive history and perform a complete physical examination on each patient. Despite the fact that there is an emerging school of thought questioning the validity of the physical examination, this tool continues to be the current standard of care and used by a majority of clinicians around the world. The physician must analyze the information obtained from his/her history, physical examination, and diagnostic tools with the recognition of the broad nature of the differential diagnoses of LBP in order to be able to best treat the patient." @default.
• W1840892723 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1840892723 creator A5016206815 @default.
• W1840892723 creator A5046873004 @default.
• W1840892723 creator A5051053156 @default.
• W1840892723 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W1840892723 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1840892723 title "The Differential Diagnosis of Low Back Pain: A Primer on the Evolving Paradigm" @default.
• W1840892723 cites W132306785 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W147874747 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W1508867735 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W1975961740 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W1976993962 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W1979914684 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W1984633828 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W1986291883 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2003034438 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2004201886 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2018805190 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2022511047 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2023370307 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2024369445 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2049679785 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2055814253 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2064311475 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2064907293 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2067689995 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2071141837 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2083857244 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2084995232 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2086536696 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2087381653 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2107510856 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2107535294 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2107617059 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2133514067 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2151209660 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2157229623 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2157244868 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2158186274 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2162006609 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2165014123 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2226901573 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W2396042774 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W4253089877 @default.
• W1840892723 cites W4293774711 @default.
• W1840892723 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12173" @default.
• W1840892723 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25395112" @default.
• W1840892723 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1840892723 type Work @default.
• W1840892723 sameAs 1840892723 @default.
• W1840892723 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232015 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232016 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232017 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232018 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232019 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232020 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232021 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232022 @default.
• W1840892723 countsByYear W18408927232023 @default.
• W1840892723 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1840892723 hasAuthorship W1840892723A5016206815 @default.
• W1840892723 hasAuthorship W1840892723A5046873004 @default.
• W1840892723 hasAuthorship W1840892723A5051053156 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C2777563447 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C2780801072 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C93226319 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C127413603 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C142724271 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C146978453 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C178790620 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C185592680 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C1862650 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C204787440 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C2777563447 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C2780801072 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C2780907711 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C71924100 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C93226319 @default.
• W1840892723 hasConceptScore W1840892723C99508421 @default.
• W1840892723 hasLocation W18408927231 @default.
• W1840892723 hasLocation W18408927232 @default.
• W1840892723 hasOpenAccess W1840892723 @default.
• W1840892723 hasPrimaryLocation W18408927231 @default.
• W1840892723 hasRelatedWork W130609696 @default.
• W1840892723 hasRelatedWork W1496202446 @default.
• W1840892723 hasRelatedWork W1992577507 @default.

• next