FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1844016470> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1844016470 abstract "This essay responds to Orin S. Kerr, Searches and Seizures in a Digital World, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 531 (2005), http://ssrn.com/abstract=697541. Professor Kerr has published a thorough and careful article on the application of the Fourth Amendment to searches of computers in private hands - a treatment that has previously escaped the attentions of legal academia. Such a treatment is perhaps so overdue that it has been overtaken by two phenomena: first, the emergence of an overriding concern within the United States about terrorism; and second, changes in the way people engage in and store their most private digital communications and artifacts. The first phenomenon has foregrounded a challenge by the President to the very notion that certain kinds of searches and seizures may be proscribed or regulated by Congress or the judiciary. The second phenomenon, grounded in the mass public availability of always-on Internet broadband, is leading to the routine entrustment of most private data to the custody of third parties - something orthogonal to a doctrinal framework in which the custodian of matter searched, rather than the person who is the real target of interest of a search, is typically the only one capable of meaningfully asserting Fourth Amendment rights to prevent a search or the use of its fruits. Together, these phenomena make the application of the Fourth Amendment to the standard searches of home computers - searches that, to be sure, are still conducted regularly by national and local law enforcement - an interesting exercise that is yet overshadowed by greatly increased government hunger for private information of all sorts, both individual and aggregate, and by rapid developments in networked technology that will be used to satisfy that hunger. Perhaps most important, these factors transform Professor Kerr's view that a search occurs for Fourth Amendment purposes only when its results are exposed to human eyes: such a notion goes from unremarkably unobjectionable - police are permitted to mirror entirely a suspect's hard drive and then are constitutionally limited as they perform searches on the copy - to dangerous to any notion of limited government powers. Professor Kerr appreciates this as a troublesome result - indeed, downright creepy - but does not dwell upon it beyond suggesting that the copying of data might be viewed as a seizure if not a search, at least so long as it involves some physical touching or temporary commandeering of the machine. This view should be amplified: If remote vacuum cleaner approaches are used to record and store potentially all Internet and telephone communications for later searching, with no Fourth Amendment barrier to the initial information-gathering activity in the field, the government will be in a position to perform comprehensive secret surveillance of the public without any structurally enforceable barrier, because it will no longer have to demand information in individual cases from third parties or intrude upon the physical premises or possessions of a search target in order to gather information of interest. The acts of intruding upon a suspect's demesnes or compelling cooperation from a third party are natural triggers for judicial process or public objection. If the government has all necessary information for a search already in its possession, then we rely only upon its self-restraint in choosing the scope and depth of otherwise unmonitorable searching. This is precisely the self-restraint that the Fourth Amendment eschews for intrusive government searches by requiring outside monitoring by disinterested magistrates - or individually exigent circumstances in which such monitoring can be bypassed. Taken together, the current areas of expansion of surveillance appear permanent rather than exigent, and sweeping rather than focused, causing the justifications behind special needs exceptions to swamp the baseline protections established for criminal investigations. This expansion stands to remove the structural safeguards designed to forestall the abuse of power by a government that knows our secrets." @default.
• W1844016470 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1844016470 creator A5001819261 @default.
• W1844016470 date "2006-07-14" @default.
• W1844016470 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1844016470 title "Searches and Seizures in a Networked World" @default.
• W1844016470 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1844016470 type Work @default.
• W1844016470 sameAs 1844016470 @default.
• W1844016470 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1844016470 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1844016470 hasAuthorship W1844016470A5001819261 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C203133693 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C50335755 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConcept C69775031 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C108827166 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C110875604 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C111472728 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C136764020 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C138885662 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C17744445 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C199539241 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C203133693 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C2778272461 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C2779777834 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C2780262971 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C41008148 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C50335755 @default.
• W1844016470 hasConceptScore W1844016470C69775031 @default.
• W1844016470 hasLocation W18440164701 @default.
• W1844016470 hasOpenAccess W1844016470 @default.
• W1844016470 hasPrimaryLocation W18440164701 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1502622779 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1503938174 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1514050290 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1526609030 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1541051242 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1550398287 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1784954126 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W1946433552 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W21697463 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W2262205046 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W2264077776 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W2380744219 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W2595427984 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W2808899410 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W286663598 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W3123745967 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W3124498589 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W3157157871 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W763293992 @default.
• W1844016470 hasRelatedWork W216792924 @default.
• W1844016470 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1844016470 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1844016470 magId "1844016470" @default.
• W1844016470 workType "article" @default.