FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1847777310> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1847777310 endingPage "7330" @default.
• W1847777310 startingPage "7310" @default.
• W1847777310 abstract "During many years since the birth of quantum mechanics, instrumentalist interpretations prevailed: the meaning of the theory was expressed in terms of measurements results. However, in the last decades, several attempts to interpret it from a realist viewpoint have been proposed. Among them, modal interpretations supply a realist non-collapse account, according to which the system always has definite properties and the quantum state represents possibilities, not actualities. But the traditional modal interpretations faced some conceptual problems when addressing imperfect measurements. The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, on the contrary, proved to be able to supply an adequate account of the measurement problem, both in its ideal and its non-ideal versions. Moreover, in the non-ideal case, it gives a precise criterion to distinguish between reliable and non-reliable measurements. Nevertheless, that criterion depends on the particular state of the measured system, and this might be considered as a shortcoming of the proposal. In fact, one could ask for a criterion of reliability that does not depend on the features of what is measured but only on the properties of the measurement device. The aim of this article is precisely to supply such a criterion: we will adopt an informational perspective for this purpose.During many years since the birth of quantum mechanics, instrumentalistinterpretations prevailed: the meaning of the theory was expressed in terms of measurementsresults. However, in the last decades, several attempts to interpret it from a realist viewpointhave been proposed. Among them, modal interpretations supply a realist non-collapseaccount, according to which the system always has definite properties and the quantum staterepresents possibilities, not actualities. But the traditional modal interpretations faced someconceptual problems when addressing imperfect measurements. The modal-Hamiltonianinterpretation, on the contrary, proved to be able to supply an adequate account of themeasurement problem, both in its ideal and its non-ideal versions. Moreover, in the non-idealcase, it gives a precise criterion to distinguish between reliable and non-reliable measurements.Nevertheless, that criterion depends on the particular state of the measured system, and thismight be considered as a shortcoming of the proposal. In fact, one could ask for a criterionof reliability that does not depend on the features of what is measured but only on theproperties of the measurement device. The aim of this article is precisely to supply such acriterion: we will adopt an informational perspective for this purpose." @default.
• W1847777310 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1847777310 creator A5011874841 @default.
• W1847777310 creator A5017618717 @default.
• W1847777310 creator A5043180294 @default.
• W1847777310 date "2015-10-28" @default.
• W1847777310 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W1847777310 title "Measurement, Interpretation and Information" @default.
• W1847777310 cites W1965803640 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W1974994086 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W1978281952 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W1986310174 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W1989023814 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W1995875735 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W1996760985 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2025987088 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2032207635 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2040525590 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2045094162 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2062010768 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2062721740 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2063981837 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2088594224 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2095660451 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2096876202 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2100906789 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2117857719 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2125303188 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2133050752 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2161235248 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W2169598121 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W3100016067 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W4238804566 @default.
• W1847777310 cites W4251155086 @default.
• W1847777310 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/e17117310" @default.
• W1847777310 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1847777310 type Work @default.
• W1847777310 sameAs 1847777310 @default.
• W1847777310 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W1847777310 countsByYear W18477773102015 @default.
• W1847777310 countsByYear W18477773102016 @default.
• W1847777310 countsByYear W18477773102018 @default.
• W1847777310 countsByYear W18477773102019 @default.
• W1847777310 countsByYear W18477773102021 @default.
• W1847777310 countsByYear W18477773102022 @default.
• W1847777310 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1847777310 hasAuthorship W1847777310A5011874841 @default.
• W1847777310 hasAuthorship W1847777310A5017618717 @default.
• W1847777310 hasAuthorship W1847777310A5043180294 @default.
• W1847777310 hasBestOaLocation W18477773101 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C11255438 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C121864883 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C15184713 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C188027245 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C198087647 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C207046469 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C2776639384 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C2780310539 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C33332235 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C71139939 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C79369538 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConcept C84114770 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C111472728 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C11255438 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C121332964 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C121864883 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C138885662 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C144237770 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C15184713 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C185592680 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C188027245 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C198087647 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C199360897 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C207046469 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C2776639384 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C2780310539 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C2780876879 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C33332235 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C33923547 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C41008148 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C41895202 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C527412718 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C62520636 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C71139939 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C79369538 @default.
• W1847777310 hasConceptScore W1847777310C84114770 @default.

• next