FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1849671144> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1849671144 endingPage "21" @default.
• W1849671144 startingPage "16" @default.
• W1849671144 abstract "Recent Higher Education Funding Council research echoes previous findings that student satisfaction scores differ between subject areas (HEFCE, 2011). However, there remains a paucity of research attempting to account for this, and these differences have only been reported for final-year student satisfaction. It is unclear at what stage during a study programme differences in satisfaction might emerge, and satisfaction of firstyear students is of particular interest because of its association with student progression and retention (Tinto, 2007). Exploratory analyses of first-year students’ responses to National Student Survey (NSS) questions (N=1180) revealed that there were significant differences in students’ perception of teaching and available resources depending on whether they were enrolled on a STEM subject course or not. Perhaps unsurprisingly (given funding council bands) the STEM students were more likely to agree that they had access to adequate resources. However, the non-STEM students were more likely to agree that their teachers were good at explaining material and were enthusiastic about their topic. Furthermore, the differences in the perceptions of teaching experienced by STEM versus non-STEM students varied as a function of sex of the student. The implications of these findings are that although the experience of STEM students may be bolstered by access to resources, their experience of teaching and learning (and particularly that experienced by males on STEM courses) is less satisfactory than that of non-STEM students. This finding is of particular interest in light of the increasing use of student satisfaction data to inform league tables and students’ degree choice. Furthermore, these data challenge stereotypes of the experiences of males and females in STEM disciplines and have implications for how STEM teaching practitioners approach the learning experience of their students." @default.
• W1849671144 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1849671144 creator A5058685461 @default.
• W1849671144 date "2012-10-01" @default.
• W1849671144 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W1849671144 title "A Comparative Analysis of Students' Satisfaction with Teaching on STEM vs. Non-STEM Programmes." @default.
• W1849671144 cites W18463141 @default.
• W1849671144 cites W2067386609 @default.
• W1849671144 cites W2095052578 @default.
• W1849671144 cites W2112657826 @default.
• W1849671144 cites W2129396851 @default.
• W1849671144 cites W2168994663 @default.
• W1849671144 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1849671144 type Work @default.
• W1849671144 sameAs 1849671144 @default.
• W1849671144 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1849671144 countsByYear W18496711442014 @default.
• W1849671144 countsByYear W18496711442015 @default.
• W1849671144 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1849671144 hasAuthorship W1849671144A5058685461 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C120912362 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C144024400 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C145420912 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C15744967 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C169760540 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C17744445 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C19165224 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C199539241 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C26760741 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C509550671 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C71924100 @default.
• W1849671144 hasConceptScore W1849671144C85973986 @default.
• W1849671144 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1849671144 hasLocation W18496711441 @default.
• W1849671144 hasOpenAccess W1849671144 @default.
• W1849671144 hasPrimaryLocation W18496711441 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W1988988558 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W1996463782 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W1999062674 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2020904649 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2026202869 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2065967195 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2076213531 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2137273939 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2345951724 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2440654879 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2590997327 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2607335067 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2751118386 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2913202796 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W2926743104 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W3015936373 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W3170940908 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W424257450 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W43570087 @default.
• W1849671144 hasRelatedWork W79141820 @default.
• W1849671144 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W1849671144 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1849671144 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1849671144 magId "1849671144" @default.
• W1849671144 workType "article" @default.