FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1854521404> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1854521404 endingPage "57" @default.
• W1854521404 startingPage "34" @default.
• W1854521404 abstract "Objective – Librarians at Rider University attempted to discern the basic information literacy (IL) skills of students over a two year period (2009-2011). This study aims to explore the impact of one-session information literacy instruction on student acquisition of the information literacy skills of identifying information and accessing information using a pretest/posttest design at a single institution. The research questions include: Do different student populations (in different class years, Honors students, etc.) possess different levels of IL? Does the frequency of prior IL Instruction (ILI) make a difference? Do students improve their IL skills after the ILI?&#x0D; &#x0D; Methods – The librarians at Rider University developed the test instruments over two years and administered them to students attending the ILI sessions each semester. The test was given to students as they entered the classroom before the official start-time of the class, and the test was stopped five minutes into the class. A pretest with five questions was developed from the 1st ACRL IL Standards. A few demographic questions were added. This pretest was used in fall 2009. In spring 2010, a second pretest was developed with five questions on the 2nd ACRL IL Standards. Students of all class years who attended ILI sessions took the pretests. In 2010-2011, the pretest combining the 10 questions used in the previous year was administered to classes taking the required CMP-125 Research Writing and the BHP-150 Honors Seminar courses. An identical posttest was given to those classes that returned for a follow-up session. Only the scores from students taking both pretests and posttests were used to compare learning outcomes.&#x0D; &#x0D; Results – Participants’ basic levels of IL skills were relatively low. Their skills in identifying needed resources (ACRL IL Standards 1) were higher than those related to information access (ACRL IL Standards 2). Freshmen in the Honors Seminar outperformed all other Rider students. No differences were found in different class years or with varying frequencies of prior IL training. In 2010-2011, students improved significantly in a few IL concepts after the ILI, but overall gains were limited.&#x0D; &#x0D; Limitations – Many limitations are present in this study, including the challenge of developing ideal test questions and that the pretest was administered to a wide variety of classes. Also not all the IL concepts in the test were adequately addressed in these sessions. These factors would have affected the results. &#x0D; &#x0D; Conclusions – The results defy a common assumption that students’ levels of IL proficiency correlate with their class years and the frequency of prior ILI in college. These findings fill a gap in the literature by supporting the anecdote that students do not retain or transfer their IL skills in the long term. The results raise an important question as to what can be done to help students more effectively learn and retain IL in college. The authors offer strategies to improve instruction and assessment, including experimenting with different pedagogies and creating different posttests for spring 2012." @default.
• W1854521404 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1854521404 creator A5006607499 @default.
• W1854521404 creator A5074546704 @default.
• W1854521404 creator A5083708582 @default.
• W1854521404 date "2013-09-13" @default.
• W1854521404 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1854521404 title "What Five Minutes in the Classroom Can Do to Uncover the Basic Information Literacy Skills of Your College Students: A Multiyear Assessment Study" @default.
• W1854521404 cites W132497157 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1515441229 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1544975839 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1552819150 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1565248047 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1567068761 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1590678114 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1604339016 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1868816792 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1970370601 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1970536584 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1973353931 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1983346517 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1987487535 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1987682761 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1990170241 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W1995509345 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2001233842 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2001770763 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2001914200 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2006648213 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2019140181 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2020715098 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2025682739 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2036351174 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2039499747 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2039604702 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2040964151 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2054926814 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2058592638 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2059276536 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2060107985 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2062867389 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2075272487 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2087479996 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2092368439 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2097853647 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2102183060 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2122223148 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2134021124 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W216569108 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2166643393 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2523100745 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2727437408 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W2767237653 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W561380108 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W570143575 @default.
• W1854521404 cites W640179266 @default.
• W1854521404 doi "https://doi.org/10.18438/b8dw4z" @default.
• W1854521404 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1854521404 type Work @default.
• W1854521404 sameAs 1854521404 @default.
• W1854521404 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W1854521404 countsByYear W18545214042014 @default.
• W1854521404 countsByYear W18545214042015 @default.
• W1854521404 countsByYear W18545214042018 @default.
• W1854521404 countsByYear W18545214042019 @default.
• W1854521404 countsByYear W18545214042020 @default.
• W1854521404 countsByYear W18545214042021 @default.
• W1854521404 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1854521404 hasAuthorship W1854521404A5006607499 @default.
• W1854521404 hasAuthorship W1854521404A5074546704 @default.
• W1854521404 hasAuthorship W1854521404A5083708582 @default.
• W1854521404 hasBestOaLocation W18545214041 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C119883117 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C2776204006 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C2777212361 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C547764534 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C119883117 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C136764020 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C145420912 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C151730666 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C154945302 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C15744967 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C19417346 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C2776204006 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C2777212361 @default.
• W1854521404 hasConceptScore W1854521404C2777267654 @default.

• next