FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W185803449> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W185803449 startingPage "16" @default.
• W185803449 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION Both the language and the legislative history of section 201(c) suggest that when in doubt, courts should construe the rights of publishers narrowly rather than broadly in relation to those of authors.... [O]ne must bear in mind that Congress passed the section to enlarge the rights of authors.(1) At the dawn of a millennium, the United States is in the midst of unprecedented technological change in which our capacity to produce, transmit, and receive information increases daily.(2) The electronic media--(3) including compact disc read-only-memory devices (CD-ROMs) and online services such as those provided by LEXIS/NEXIS (NEXIS) and Westlaw--have redefined the ways in which consumers acquire this information. As communicative technology grows, conflicts over ownership of creative content are inevitable, giving rise to the need to reevaluate the rules of ownership of intellectual property in the modern environment of electronic publishing. For more than a decade, publishers have increasingly made the contents of their newspapers and magazines available through electronic media. However, only recently have freelance(4) authors legally challenged these publishers for allegedly infringing their copyrights in underlying works of authorship.(5) In the absence of express agreements to the contrary, the authors maintain that section 201(c) of the Copyright Act of 1976 (1976 Act)(6) gives publishers only the limited privilege of publishing an article as part of a particular collective work, any revision of that collective work, and any later collective work in the same series(7) and that republication in electronic does not fit within this definition. Publishers disagree and seek a more liberal interpretation of section 201(c). At its core, the issue appears quite simple: What is the definition of revision, and does it include certain formats of electronic database publishing? Closely related to this issue is another important question: Do certain electronic formats, whether revisions or not, infringe an author's right of reproduction through providing for and encouraging reprinting of individually copyrighted articles? This Note examines the existing bases for interpreting the section 201(c) revision privilege with respect to electronic media, including the Act's plain language, legislative intent, and broader issues of public policy in the realm of copyright. Part II discusses the body of copyright law pertinent to this inquiry, beginning with a succinct and general overview. Part III turns to the landmark case, Tasini v. New York Times,(8) which is the first and only case to interpret section 201(c) with respect to electronic media. In addition, Part III examines the reasoning of both the district court, which held in favor of the publisher defendants, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which recently reversed the decision. Part IV briefly analyzes a district court opinion out of the Second Circuit, Ryan v. Carl Corp.,(9) which is the only other case addressing section 201(c) and the electronic media, albeit in dicta. Part V explores related case law dealing with new media in licensing agreements, which offers further insight into the role of public policy in technology licensing cases. Part VI examines copyright clearinghouses as necessary and effective tools for the administration of collective licensing of freelance articles. Part VII concludes that unauthorized republication of freelance articles in some formats, including NEXIS and certain CD-ROMs, infringes on an author's reproduction rights. Such republication is authorized under section 201 (c) only if it retains the publisher's contribution to the collective work, is inherently recognizable as a version of that collective work, and does not sever the individual article from the collective work. This Note ultimately suggests a revision analysis which would effectively support the policy goals of copyright incentive of both the 1976 Act and the U. …" @default.
• W185803449 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W185803449 creator A5066965380 @default.
• W185803449 date "2000-05-01" @default.
• W185803449 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W185803449 title "Interpreting the Copyright Act’s Section 201(c) Revision Privilege with Respect to Electronic Media" @default.
• W185803449 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W185803449 type Work @default.
• W185803449 sameAs 185803449 @default.
• W185803449 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W185803449 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W185803449 hasAuthorship W185803449A5066965380 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C201280247 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C2776254780 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C2779151265 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C2779710374 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C2780138299 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C2987650672 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W185803449 hasConcept C516687495 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C112698675 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C138885662 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C144024400 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C144133560 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C151719136 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C17744445 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C190253527 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C199539241 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C201280247 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C2776254780 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C2779151265 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C2779710374 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C2780129039 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C2780138299 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C2987650672 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C34974158 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C41895202 @default.
• W185803449 hasConceptScore W185803449C516687495 @default.
• W185803449 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W185803449 hasLocation W1858034491 @default.
• W185803449 hasOpenAccess W185803449 @default.
• W185803449 hasPrimaryLocation W1858034491 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W122190632 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W1489418896 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W1594975581 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W1597759919 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W2099674849 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W2170483044 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W2317918478 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W2506845615 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W2567250445 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W258347739 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W3122115666 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W3122811772 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W3124945490 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W3125702130 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W3159566279 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W334407661 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W646059741 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W93101695 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W190627607 @default.
• W185803449 hasRelatedWork W2596096828 @default.
• W185803449 hasVolume "52" @default.
• W185803449 isParatext "false" @default.
• W185803449 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W185803449 magId "185803449" @default.
• W185803449 workType "article" @default.