FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1859449697> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1859449697 endingPage "117" @default.
• W1859449697 startingPage "106" @default.
• W1859449697 abstract "ABSTRACT Besides responses to the target pair of stimuli being tested in a paired preference test, comparison with responses to a putatively identical “placebo” pair can be used for a test of significance, to determine whether the response frequencies elicited by the target pair are different from those that would be obtained had there been no preference. Yet, preference responses elicited by the placebo pair can also be used as a way of identifying consumers who bias avoided the “No preference” option and thus generated biased response. Such consumers can then be eliminated. Yet, using this approach greatly reduces the sample size. However, using some response options associated with purchase intent rather than liking can reduce the number of consumers that are eliminated. This was confirmed for potato chip, milk and orange juice stimuli. From psychology, the concepts of operational preference and types of response bias appropriate to preference testing were introduced and discussed. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The measurement of preference and acceptance of foods is important for product development and decisions regarding the launching of new products into the market. The paired preference test has some issues associated with its design and analysis, and these must be considered if preference tests are to give valid and reliable data. One of the problems is that the majority of consumers tend to report preferences even when the stimuli are putatively identical; here, a “No preference” response would seem more appropriate. Such consumers would seem to be reacting to the extraneous conditions of the preference test rather than the sensory characteristics of the putatively identical stimuli under consideration. Such responses could be termed “biased response.” Yet, the consumers' responses to the target (different) stimuli under consideration could be trusted more if the consumers had shown that they did not have this tendency to give “biased responses.” They would show this by selecting a “No preference” response to putatively identical stimuli. This paper shows that the tendency to give “biased response” can be reduced by manipulating the wording of the preference question. This does not furnish a complete solution to the problem but it indicates one possible step toward solution and adds valuable information to the body of knowledge that is being built with a view avoiding the difficulties associated with preference testing." @default.
• W1859449697 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1859449697 creator A5026591015 @default.
• W1859449697 creator A5053481063 @default.
• W1859449697 creator A5059917692 @default.
• W1859449697 creator A5063805776 @default.
• W1859449697 date "2011-02-20" @default.
• W1859449697 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1859449697 title "PAIRED PREFERENCE TESTS: USE OF PLACEBO STIMULI WITH LIKING AND BUYING PREFERENCES" @default.
• W1859449697 cites W1970569676 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W1977025181 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W1986997680 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W1999050633 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2000257120 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2016602374 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2018972689 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2024185243 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2030807788 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2036462292 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2039217733 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2048341011 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2049847930 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2052255655 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2058919365 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2069708611 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2077315703 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2079386455 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2081263518 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2084413241 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2093441266 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2106123634 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2115347839 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2130769838 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2136399188 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2140055496 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W2148199310 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W4237467279 @default.
• W1859449697 cites W4243723263 @default.
• W1859449697 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459x.2011.00327.x" @default.
• W1859449697 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1859449697 type Work @default.
• W1859449697 sameAs 1859449697 @default.
• W1859449697 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972012 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972013 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972014 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972015 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972016 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972017 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972019 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972020 @default.
• W1859449697 countsByYear W18594496972022 @default.
• W1859449697 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1859449697 hasAuthorship W1859449697A5026591015 @default.
• W1859449697 hasAuthorship W1859449697A5053481063 @default.
• W1859449697 hasAuthorship W1859449697A5059917692 @default.
• W1859449697 hasAuthorship W1859449697A5063805776 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C152455256 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C2779055558 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C2779213276 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C3018304881 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C105795698 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C112698675 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C144133560 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C151730666 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C152455256 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C15744967 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C180747234 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C2777267654 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C2779055558 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C2779213276 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C2781249084 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C3018304881 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C33923547 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C77805123 @default.
• W1859449697 hasConceptScore W1859449697C86803240 @default.
• W1859449697 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1859449697 hasLocation W18594496971 @default.
• W1859449697 hasOpenAccess W1859449697 @default.
• W1859449697 hasPrimaryLocation W18594496971 @default.
• W1859449697 hasRelatedWork W1859449697 @default.
• W1859449697 hasRelatedWork W1985745355 @default.
• W1859449697 hasRelatedWork W2036462292 @default.
• W1859449697 hasRelatedWork W2039217733 @default.
• W1859449697 hasRelatedWork W2140055496 @default.
• W1859449697 hasRelatedWork W2528099793 @default.
• W1859449697 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.

• next