FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1861673140> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1861673140 endingPage "e0135583" @default.
• W1861673140 startingPage "e0135583" @default.
• W1861673140 abstract "An important attribute of the traditional impact factor was the controversial 2-year citation window. So far, several scholars have proposed using different citation time windows for evaluating journals. However, there is no confirmation whether a longer citation time window would be better. How did the journal evaluation effects of 3IF, 4IF, and 6IF comparing with 2IF and 5IF? In order to understand these questions, we made a comparative study of impact factors with different citation time windows with the peer-reviewed scores of ophthalmologic journals indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database.The peer-reviewed scores of 28 ophthalmologic journals were obtained through a self-designed survey questionnaire. Impact factors with different citation time windows (including 2IF, 3IF, 4IF, 5IF, and 6IF) of 28 ophthalmologic journals were computed and compared in accordance with each impact factor's definition and formula, using the citation analysis function of the Web of Science (WoS) database. An analysis of the correlation between impact factors with different citation time windows and peer-reviewed scores was carried out.Although impact factor values with different citation time windows were different, there was a high level of correlation between them when it came to evaluating journals. In the current study, for ophthalmologic journals' impact factors with different time windows in 2013, 3IF and 4IF seemed the ideal ranges for comparison, when assessed in relation to peer-reviewed scores. In addition, the 3-year and 4-year windows were quite consistent with the cited peak age of documents published by ophthalmologic journals.Our study is based on ophthalmology journals and we only analyze the impact factors with different citation time window in 2013, so it has yet to be ascertained whether other disciplines (especially those with a later cited peak) or other years would follow the same or similar patterns.We designed the survey questionnaire ourselves, specifically to assess the real influence of journals. We used peer-reviewed scores to judge the journal evaluation effect of impact factors with different citation time windows. The main purpose of this study was to help researchers better understand the role of impact factors with different citation time windows in journal evaluation." @default.
• W1861673140 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1861673140 creator A5013007732 @default.
• W1861673140 creator A5026505157 @default.
• W1861673140 creator A5026630889 @default.
• W1861673140 creator A5056674179 @default.
• W1861673140 date "2015-08-21" @default.
• W1861673140 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1861673140 title "An Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Scores and Impact Factors with Different Citation Time Windows: A Case Study of 28 Ophthalmologic Journals" @default.
• W1861673140 cites W1965367747 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W1968195205 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W1972045502 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W1980873750 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W1986219263 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W1994759214 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2008031367 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2011639161 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2019031214 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2028442912 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2028653291 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2029305005 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2037471544 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2051021140 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2053549370 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2058244584 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2059236018 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2069656088 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2080937708 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2089686078 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2098908673 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2107680813 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2118472569 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2124329967 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2135336774 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2140283616 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2141857172 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W2172025811 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W3104719570 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W3105236240 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W4235573063 @default.
• W1861673140 cites W1977956456 @default.
• W1861673140 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135583" @default.
• W1861673140 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4546661" @default.
• W1861673140 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26295157" @default.
• W1861673140 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1861673140 type Work @default.
• W1861673140 sameAs 1861673140 @default.
• W1861673140 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402015 @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402017 @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402018 @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402019 @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402020 @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402021 @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402022 @default.
• W1861673140 countsByYear W18616731402023 @default.
• W1861673140 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1861673140 hasAuthorship W1861673140A5013007732 @default.
• W1861673140 hasAuthorship W1861673140A5026505157 @default.
• W1861673140 hasAuthorship W1861673140A5026630889 @default.
• W1861673140 hasAuthorship W1861673140A5056674179 @default.
• W1861673140 hasBestOaLocation W18616731401 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C105345328 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C2779455604 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C3020774429 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C105345328 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C142724271 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C161191863 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C23123220 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C2778805511 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C2779455604 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C3020774429 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C41008148 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C55493867 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C71924100 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C86803240 @default.
• W1861673140 hasConceptScore W1861673140C95190672 @default.
• W1861673140 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1861673140 hasLocation W18616731401 @default.
• W1861673140 hasLocation W18616731402 @default.
• W1861673140 hasLocation W18616731403 @default.
• W1861673140 hasLocation W18616731404 @default.
• W1861673140 hasLocation W18616731405 @default.
• W1861673140 hasOpenAccess W1861673140 @default.
• W1861673140 hasPrimaryLocation W18616731401 @default.
• W1861673140 hasRelatedWork W1890493318 @default.
• W1861673140 hasRelatedWork W2029486687 @default.
• W1861673140 hasRelatedWork W2103252331 @default.
• W1861673140 hasRelatedWork W2340205129 @default.

• next